Literature DB >> 27363329

Increased pediatric sub-specialization is associated with decreased surgical complication rates for inpatient pediatric urology procedures.

R Tejwani1, H-H S Wang1, B J Young1, N H Greene2, S Wolf3, J S Wiener1, J C Routh4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Increased case volumes and training are associated with better surgical outcomes. However, the impact of pediatric urology sub-specialization on perioperative complication rates is unknown.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the presence and magnitude of difference in rates of common postoperative complications for elective pediatric urology procedures between specialization levels of urologic surgeons. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), a nationally representative administrative database, was used. STUDY
DESIGN: The NIS (1998-2009) was retrospectively reviewed for pediatric (≤18 years) admissions, using ICD-9-CM codes to identify urologic surgeries and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) inpatient postoperative complications. Degree of pediatric sub-specialization was calculated using a Pediatric Proportion Index (PPI), defined as the ratio of children to total patients operated on by each provider. The providers were grouped into PPI quartiles: Q1, 0-25% specialization; Q2, 25-50%; Q3, 50-75%; Q4, 75-100%. Weighted multivariate analysis was performed to test for associations between PPI and surgical complications.
RESULTS: A total of 71,479 weighted inpatient admissions were identified. Patient age decreased with increasing specialization: Q1, 7.9 vs Q2, 4.8 vs Q3, 4.8 vs Q4, 4.6 years, P < 0.01). Specialization was not associated with race (P > 0.20), gender (P > 0.50), or comorbidity scores (P = 0.10). Mortality (1.5% vs 0.2% vs 0.3% vs 0.4%, P < 0.01) and complication rates (15.5% vs 11.7% vs 9.6% vs 10.9%, P < 0.0001) both decreased with increasing specialization. Patients treated by more highly specialized surgeons incurred slightly higher costs (Q2, +4%; Q3, +1%; Q4 + 2%) but experienced shorter length of hospital stay (Q2, -5%; Q3, -10%; Q4, -3%) compared with the least specialized providers. A greater proportion of patients treated by Q1 and Q3 specialized urologists had CCS ≥2 than those seen by Q2 or Q4 urologists (12.5% and 12.2%, respectively vs 8.4% and 10.9%, respectively, P = 0.04). Adjusting for confounding effects, increased pediatric specialization was associated with decreased postoperative complications: Q2 OR 0.78, CI 0.58-1.05; Q3 OR 0.60, CI 0.44-0.84; Q4 OR 0.70, CI 0.58-0.84; P < 0.01. DISCUSSION: Providers with proportionally higher volumes of pediatric patients achieved better postoperative outcomes than their less sub-specialized counterparts. This may have arisen from increased exposure to pediatric anatomy and physiology, and greater familiarity with pediatric techniques. LIMITATION: The NIS admission-based retrospective design did not enable assessment of long-term outcomes, repeated admissions, or to track a particular patient across time. The study was similarly limited in evaluating the effect of pre-surgical referral patterns on patient distributions.
CONCLUSIONS: Increased pediatric sub-specialization among urologists was associated with a decreased risk of mortality and surgical complications in children undergoing inpatient urologic procedures.
Copyright © 2016 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pediatric; Postoperative complications; Specialization; Urology

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27363329      PMCID: PMC5161733          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.05.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Urol        ISSN: 1477-5131            Impact factor:   1.830


  28 in total

1.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  The effect of surgical training and hospital characteristics on patient outcomes after pediatric surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ceri Evans; Hugo C van Woerden
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 3.  A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome.

Authors:  M M Chowdhury; H Dagash; A Pierro
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 4.  Subspecialty accreditation: is being special good?

Authors:  Georges Desjardins; Michael K Cahalan
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.706

5.  Optimizing resources for the surgical care of children: an American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Clinical Trials Committee consensus statement.

Authors:  Adam B Goldin; Roshni Dasgupta; Li Ern Chen; Martin L Blakely; Saleem Islam; Cynthia D Downard; Shawn J Rangel; Shawn D St Peter; Casey M Calkins; Marjorie J Arca; Douglas C Barnhart; Jacqueline M Saito; Keith T Oldham; Fizan Abdullah
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 2.545

6.  The subspecialization of surgery: a paradigm shift.

Authors:  Stephen D Bruns; Brian R Davis; Aram N Demirjian; Sabha Ganai; Michael G House; Reza F Saidi; Bhavin C Shah; Sanda A Tan; Kenric M Murayama
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Treatment by specialist surgical neurooncologists improves survival times for patients with malignant glioma.

Authors:  Ursalan A Khan; Amar Bhavsar; Hasan Asif; Konstantina Karabatsou; James R S Leggate; Ajit Sofat; Ian D Kamaly-Asl
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 8.  Deconstructing sickle cell disease: reappraisal of the role of hemolysis in the development of clinical subphenotypes.

Authors:  Gregory J Kato; Mark T Gladwin; Martin H Steinberg
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 8.250

9.  Specialty versus generalist care of children with appendicitis: an outcome comparison.

Authors:  F Alexander; D Magnuson; J DiFiore; K Jirousek; M Secic
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.545

10.  Comparison of pediatric surgical outcomes by the surgeon's degree of specialization in children.

Authors:  Daniel Rhee; Dominic Papandria; Jessica Yang; Yiyi Zhang; Gezzer Ortega; Paul M Colombani; David C Chang; Fizan Abdullah
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.545

View more
  7 in total

1.  Open versus minimally invasive surgical approaches in pediatric urology: Trends in utilization and complications.

Authors:  Rohit Tejwani; Brian J Young; Hsin-Hsiao S Wang; Steven Wolf; J Todd Purves; John S Wiener; Jonathan C Routh
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 1.830

Review 2.  Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery-What Does Certification Mean?

Authors:  Steven J Weissbart; Alan J Wein; Ariana L Smith
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Comparative Analysis of Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes Between Arthroplasty and Nonarthroplasty Fellowship Trained Surgeons.

Authors:  Vivek Singh; Trevor Simcox; Vinay K Aggarwal; Ran Schwarzkopf; William J Long
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-02-26

4.  Open versus minimally-invasive surgical techniques in pediatric renal tumors: A population-level analysis of in-hospital outcomes.

Authors:  Kirsten L Simmons; Jason C Chandrapal; Steven Wolf; Henry E Rice; Elisabeth E Tracy; Tamara Fitzgerald; Gina-Maria Pomann; Jonathan C Routh
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 1.921

5.  Challenges of training and delivery of pediatric surgical services in developing economies: a perspective from Pakistan.

Authors:  Amir Humza Sohail; Muhammad Hassaan Arif Maan; Mohammed Sachal; Muhammad Soban
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 2.125

6.  Are we ready for urological subspecialty-based practice in India? The resident's perspective.

Authors:  Ashwin Sunil Tamhankar; Ravindra Sabnis; Gagan Gautam
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar

7.  Relative to open surgery, minimally-invasive renal and ureteral pediatric surgery offers no improvement in 30-day complications, yet requires longer operative time: Data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatrics.

Authors:  Marc Colaco; Austin Hester; William Visser; Alison Rasper; Ryan Terlecki
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2018-04-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.