Literature DB >> 25639774

Costs associated with ambulatory care sensitive conditions across hospital-based settings.

Jessica E Galarraga1, Ryan Mutter, Jesse M Pines.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) are acute care diagnoses that could potentially be prevented through improved primary care. This study investigated how payments and charges for these ACSC visits differ by three hospital-based settings (outpatient, emergency department [ED], and inpatient) and examined differences in payments and charges by their physician and facility components.
METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of data (2005 through 2010) from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Multiple linear regression models were used to assess differences in the mean-adjusted payments and charges for ACSC visits by clinical setting and further divided payments and charges into physician and facility components.
RESULTS: Of all ACSC visits from 2005 through 2010, 41% were outpatient visits, 36% were ED visits, and 23% were hospital admissions. After adjusting for patient demographics and comorbid conditions, charges for an inpatient ACSC visit were four times higher ($11,414 vs. $2,563) and payments were five times higher ($4,325 vs. $859) when compared to an ED visit. By comparison, charges for an ACSC ED visit were two times higher ($2,563 vs. $1,084) and payments 2.5 times higher ($859 vs. $341) relative to an ACSC visit managed in an outpatient hospital-based clinic. Across all clinical settings, hospital facility fees account for 77% to 94% of the charge differences and 81% to 93% of the payment differences.
CONCLUSIONS: For hospital-based ACSC visits, inpatient hospitalizations are by far the most expensive. Finding ways to expand outpatient resources and improve the health management of the chronically ill may avoid conditions that lead to more expensive hospital-based encounters. Across all hospital-based settings, facility fees are the major contributor of expense.
© 2015 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25639774     DOI: 10.1111/acem.12579

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  26 in total

1.  Development and Validation of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Measures of Potentially Preventable Emergency Department (ED) Visits: The ED Prevention Quality Indicators for General Health Conditions.

Authors:  Sheryl Davies; Ellen Schultz; Maria Raven; Nancy Ewen Wang; Carol L Stocks; Mucio Kit Delgado; Kathryn M McDonald
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Ambulatory Care Sensitive Hospitalizations among Medicaid Beneficiaries with Chronic Conditions.

Authors:  Ishveen Chopra; Tricia Lee Wilkins; Usha Sambamoorthi
Journal:  Hosp Pract (1995)       Date:  2016

Review 3.  Emergency Department Use by Community-Dwelling Individuals With Dementia in the United States: An Integrative Review.

Authors:  Lauren J Hunt; Lorinda A Coombs; Caroline E Stephens
Journal:  J Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 1.254

4.  Design and patient characteristics of the randomized controlled trial TExT-MED + FANS A test of mHealth augmented social support added to a patient-focused text-messaging intervention for emergency department patients with poorly controlled diabetes.

Authors:  Elizabeth Burner; Janisse Mercado; Antonio Hernandez-Saenz; Anne Peters; Wendy Mack; Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati; Sanjay Arora; Shinyi Wu
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Adaptation of time-driven activity-based costing to the evaluation of the efficiency of ambulatory care provided in the emergency department.

Authors:  Simon Berthelot; Myriam Mallet; Sébastien Blais; Lynne Moore; Jason R Guertin; Justine Boulet; Christian Boilard; Camille Fortier; Benoît Huard; Akram Mokhtari; Annika Lesage; Émilie Lévesque; Laurence Baril; Pascale Olivier; Keven Vachon; Olivia Yip; Mathieu Bouchard; David Simonyan; Mélanie Létourneau; Amélie Pineault; Adrien Vézo; Henry T Stelfox
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2022-07-18

6.  Potentially Preventable Intensive Care Unit Admissions in the United States, 2006-2015.

Authors:  Gary E Weissman; Meeta Prasad Kerlin; Yihao Yuan; Rachel Kohn; George L Anesi; Peter W Groeneveld; Rachel M Werner; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2020-01

7.  Potential for Cost Saving with Iclaprim Owing to Avoidance of Vancomycin-Associated Acute Kidney Injury in Hospitalized Patients with Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections.

Authors:  Nimish Patel; David Huang; Thomas Lodise
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.859

8.  Comparing Preventable Acute Care Use of Rural Versus Urban Americans: an Observational Study of National Rates During 2008-2017.

Authors:  Kenton J Johnston; Hefei Wen; Ameya Kotwal; Karen E Joynt Maddox
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Association of Primary Language and Hospitalization for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions.

Authors:  Timothy S Anderson; Leah S Karliner; Grace A Lin
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.178

10.  A Longitudinal Analysis of Functional Disability, Recovery, and Nursing Home Utilization After Hospitalization for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions Among Community-Living Older Persons.

Authors:  Cameron J Gettel; Arjun K Venkatesh; Linda S Leo-Summers; Terrence E Murphy; Evelyne A Gahbauer; Ula Hwang; Thomas M Gill
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 2.899

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.