Timothy S Anderson1,2, Leah S Karliner2, Grace A Lin2. 1. Division of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA. 2. Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Limited English proficiency is associated with decreased access to ambulatory care, however, it is unclear if this disparity leads to increased use of emergency departments (EDs) for low severity ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs). OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the association between the patient's preferred language and hospital utilization for ACSCs. RESEARCH DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all ED visits in New Jersey in 2013 and 2014. The primary outcome was hospital admission for acute ACSCs, chronic ACSCs, and fractures (a nonambulatory care sensitive control condition). Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) utilization and length of stay. Mixed-effect regression models estimated the association between preferred language (English vs. non-English) and study outcomes, controlling for demographics, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: We examined 201,351 ED visits for acute ACSCs, 251,193 visits for chronic ACSCs, and 148,428 visits for fractures, of which 13.5%, 11.1%, and 9.9%, respectively, were by non-English speakers. In adjusted analyses, non-English speakers were less likely to be admitted for acute ACSCs [-3.1%; 95% confidence interval (CI), -3.6% to -2.5%] and chronic ACSCs (-2.3%; 95% CI, -2.8% to -1.7%) but not fractures (0.4%; 95% CI, -0.2% to 1.0%). Among hospitalized patients, non-English speakers were less likely to receive ICU services but had no difference in length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest non-English-speaking patients may seek ED care for lower acuity ACSCs than English-speaking patients. Efforts to decrease preventable ED and increase access to ambulatory care use should consider the needs of non-English-speaking patients.
BACKGROUND: Limited English proficiency is associated with decreased access to ambulatory care, however, it is unclear if this disparity leads to increased use of emergency departments (EDs) for low severity ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs). OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the association between the patient's preferred language and hospital utilization for ACSCs. RESEARCH DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all ED visits in New Jersey in 2013 and 2014. The primary outcome was hospital admission for acute ACSCs, chronic ACSCs, and fractures (a nonambulatory care sensitive control condition). Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) utilization and length of stay. Mixed-effect regression models estimated the association between preferred language (English vs. non-English) and study outcomes, controlling for demographics, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: We examined 201,351 ED visits for acute ACSCs, 251,193 visits for chronic ACSCs, and 148,428 visits for fractures, of which 13.5%, 11.1%, and 9.9%, respectively, were by non-English speakers. In adjusted analyses, non-English speakers were less likely to be admitted for acute ACSCs [-3.1%; 95% confidence interval (CI), -3.6% to -2.5%] and chronic ACSCs (-2.3%; 95% CI, -2.8% to -1.7%) but not fractures (0.4%; 95% CI, -0.2% to 1.0%). Among hospitalized patients, non-English speakers were less likely to receive ICU services but had no difference in length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest non-English-speaking patients may seek ED care for lower acuity ACSCs than English-speaking patients. Efforts to decrease preventable ED and increase access to ambulatory care use should consider the needs of non-English-speaking patients.
Authors: Benjamin D Sommers; Kao-Ping Chua; Genevieve M Kenney; Sharon K Long; Stacey McMorrow Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2015-10-06 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Ann D Bagchi; Stacy Dale; Natalya Verbitsky-Savitz; Sky Andrecheck; Kathleen Zavotsky; Robert Eisenstein Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2010-08-03 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Yael Schenker; Andrew J Karter; Dean Schillinger; E Margaret Warton; Nancy E Adler; Howard H Moffet; Ameena T Ahmed; Alicia Fernandez Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2010-03-11
Authors: Leah S Karliner; Andrew Auerbach; Anna Nápoles; Dean Schillinger; Dana Nickleach; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable Journal: Med Care Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Juan P Wisnivesky; Katherine Krauskopf; Michael S Wolf; Elizabeth A H Wilson; Anastasia Sofianou; Melissa Martynenko; Ethan A Halm; Howard Leventhal; Alex D Federman Journal: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Date: 2012-07-18 Impact factor: 6.347
Authors: Ka Ming Ngai; Corita R Grudzen; Roy Lee; Vicky Y Tong; Lynne D Richardson; Alicia Fernandez Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2016-03-29 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Alejandra Casillas; Cristina Valdovinos; Elizabeth Wang; Anshu Abhat; Carmen Mendez; Griselda Gutierrez; Jennifer Portz; Arleen Brown; Courtney R Lyles Journal: Front Digit Health Date: 2022-08-09
Authors: Alison P Woods; Andrea Alonso; Swetha Duraiswamy; Carl Ceraolo; Timothy Feeney; Christine M Gunn; William R Burns; Dorry L Segev; F Thurston Drake Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-02-02 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Alessandro Lamberti-Castronuovo; Martina Valente; Chiara Aleni; Ives Hubloue; Luca Ragazzoni; Francesco Barone-Adesi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-07-27 Impact factor: 4.614