Literature DB >> 25639616

Pattern of invasion is the most important prognostic factor in patients with penile cancer submitted to lymph node dissection and pathological absence of lymph node metastasis.

Giuliano Aita1, Walter Henriques da Costa1, Stenio de Cassio Zequi1, Isabela Werneck da Cunha1, Fernando Soares1, Gustavo Cardoso Guimaraes1, Ademar Lopes1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify prognostic factors in a cohort of patients with penile carcinoma with pathological absence of lymph node metastasis (pN0), as penile carcinoma is a rare neoplasm in European countries, in which the presence of lymph node metastasis is the most important prognostic factor but few studies have examined patients with penile carcinoma with histologically negative nodes (pN0). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of patients with penile carcinoma, 101 met the inclusion criteria; 47 (46.5%) underwent bilateral inguinal lymph node dissection (LND) and 54 (53.5%) underwent bilateral inguinopelvic LND. Variables that had a prognostic impact on survival rates in univariate analysis were selected for multivariate survival analysis.
RESULTS: The cohorts cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 88.1% and 52.5%, respectively. Histological grade and pattern of invasion were the only features to significantly impact survival rates in the univariate analysis. The CSS and OS rates in patients with 'pushing' vs 'infiltrating' patterns of invasion were 98.0% vs 78.4% (P = 0.003) and 70.0% vs 35.3% (P = 0.005), respectively. Pattern of invasion was the only independent predictor of survival. Patients with infiltrating invasion had a higher probability of death from cancer (hazard ratio [HR] 11.5, P = 0.019) and overall death (HR 2.3, P = 0.007) compared with those with a pushing invasion pattern.
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of an infiltrating pattern of invasion is the most important predictor of survival in patients with penile carcinoma. We encourage other centres to confirm our findings that the pattern of invasion is an important prognostic factor in patients with penile carcinoma and pN0 disease.
© 2015 The Authors BJU International © 2015 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lymph node; penile cancer; prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25639616     DOI: 10.1111/bju.13071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  5 in total

1.  Perinerural, lymphovascular and depths of invasion in extrapolating nodal metastasis in oral cancer.

Authors:  Alkananda Sahoo; Swagatika Panda; Neeta Mohanty; Debkant Jena; Niranjan Mishra; Manas R Baisakh
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Prognostic factors in patients with penile cancer after surgical management.

Authors:  Shuguang Wen; Wenbiao Ren; Bichen Xue; Yi Fan; Yongjun Jiang; Chunming Zeng; Yujia Li; Xiongbing Zu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Tumor histologic grade is the most important prognostic factor in patients with penile cancer and clinically negative lymph nodes not submitted to regional lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Giuliano Amorim Aita; Stênio de Cássio Zequi; Walter Henriques da Costa; Gustavo Cardoso Guimarães; Fernando Augusto Soares; Thais Safranov Giuliangelis
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 4.  Surveillance strategies in the management of penile cancer.

Authors:  Simpa S Salami; Jeffrey S Montgomery
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-10

5.  The peri- and intratumoral immune cell infiltrate and PD-L1 status in invasive squamous cell carcinomas of the penis.

Authors:  T Müller; M Demes; A Lehn; J Köllermann; S Vallo; P J Wild; R Winkelmann
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 3.405

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.