Nicolas Depauw1, Estelle Batin2, Julianne Daartz2, Anatoly Rosenfeld3, Judith Adams2, Hanne Kooy2, Shannon MacDonald2, Hsiao-Ming Lu2. 1. Francis H. Burr Proton Therapy Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia. Electronic address: ndepauw@partners.org. 2. Francis H. Burr Proton Therapy Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT), currently offered at Massachusetts General Hospital, uses proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) with intensity modulation, achieving complete target coverage of the chest wall and all nodal regions and reduced dose to the cardiac structures. This work presents the current methodology for such treatment and the ongoing effort for its improvements. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A single PBS field is optimized to ensure appropriate target coverage and heart/lung sparing, using an in-house-developed proton planning system with the capability of multicriteria optimization. The dose to the chest wall skin is controlled as a separate objective in the optimization. Surface imaging is used for setup because it is a suitable surrogate for superficial target volumes. In order to minimize the effect of beam range uncertainties, the relative proton stopping power ratio of the material in breast implants was determined through separate measurements. Phantom measurements were also made to validate the accuracy of skin dose calculation in the treatment planning system. Additionally, the treatment planning robustness was evaluated relative to setup perturbations and patient breathing motion. RESULTS: PBS PMRT planning resulted in appropriate target coverage and organ sparing, comparable to treatments by passive scattering (PS) beams but much improved in nodal coverage and cardiac sparing compared to conventional treatments by photon/electron beams. The overall treatment time was much shorter than PS and also shorter than conventional photon/electron treatment. The accuracy of the skin dose calculation by the planning system was within ±2%. The treatment was shown to be adequately robust relative to both setup uncertainties and patient breathing motion, resulting in clinically satisfying dose distributions. CONCLUSIONS: More than 25 PMRT patients have been successfully treated at Massachusetts General Hospital by using single-PBS fields. The methodology and robustness of both the setup and the treatment have been discussed.
PURPOSE: Postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT), currently offered at Massachusetts General Hospital, uses proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) with intensity modulation, achieving complete target coverage of the chest wall and all nodal regions and reduced dose to the cardiac structures. This work presents the current methodology for such treatment and the ongoing effort for its improvements. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A single PBS field is optimized to ensure appropriate target coverage and heart/lung sparing, using an in-house-developed proton planning system with the capability of multicriteria optimization. The dose to the chest wall skin is controlled as a separate objective in the optimization. Surface imaging is used for setup because it is a suitable surrogate for superficial target volumes. In order to minimize the effect of beam range uncertainties, the relative proton stopping power ratio of the material in breast implants was determined through separate measurements. Phantom measurements were also made to validate the accuracy of skin dose calculation in the treatment planning system. Additionally, the treatment planning robustness was evaluated relative to setup perturbations and patient breathing motion. RESULTS:PBS PMRT planning resulted in appropriate target coverage and organ sparing, comparable to treatments by passive scattering (PS) beams but much improved in nodal coverage and cardiac sparing compared to conventional treatments by photon/electron beams. The overall treatment time was much shorter than PS and also shorter than conventional photon/electron treatment. The accuracy of the skin dose calculation by the planning system was within ±2%. The treatment was shown to be adequately robust relative to both setup uncertainties and patient breathing motion, resulting in clinically satisfying dose distributions. CONCLUSIONS: More than 25 PMRT patients have been successfully treated at Massachusetts General Hospital by using single-PBS fields. The methodology and robustness of both the setup and the treatment have been discussed.
Authors: Chia-Chun Wang; Aimee L McNamara; Jungwook Shin; Jan Schuemann; Clemens Grassberger; Alphonse G Taghian; Rachel B Jimenez; Shannon M MacDonald; Harald Paganetti Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2020-03-30 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Alice Y Ho; Jean L Wright; Rachel C Blitzblau; Robert W Mutter; Dan G Duda; Larry Norton; Aditya Bardia; Laura Spring; Steven J Isakoff; Jonathan H Chen; Clemens Grassberger; Jennifer R Bellon; Sushil Beriwal; Atif J Khan; Corey Speers; Samantha A Dunn; Alastair Thompson; Cesar A Santa-Maria; Ian E Krop; Elizabeth Mittendorf; Tari A King; Gaorav P Gupta Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Jennifer Ma; Benjamin H Lok; Jingfeng Zong; Stanley I Gutiontov; Xin Cai; Andrew C Bell; Marina Shcherba; Han Xiao; Eric J Sherman; Chiaojung Jillian Tsai; Nadeem Riaz; Sean M McBride; Oren Cahlon; Nancy Y Lee Journal: Int J Part Ther Date: 2018
Authors: Robert W Mutter; J Isabelle Choi; Rachel B Jimenez; Youlia M Kirova; Marcio Fagundes; Bruce G Haffty; Richard A Amos; Julie A Bradley; Peter Y Chen; Xuanfeng Ding; Antoinette M Carr; Leslie M Taylor; Mark Pankuch; Raymond B Mailhot Vega; Alice Y Ho; Petra Witt Nyström; Lisa A McGee; James J Urbanic; Oren Cahlon; John H Maduro; Shannon M MacDonald Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 8.013
Authors: Valentina Ovalle; Eric A Strom; Simona Shaitelman; Karen Hoffman; Richard Amos; George Perkins; Welela Tereffe; Benjamin D Smith; Michael Stauder; Wendy Woodward Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2018-04-07 Impact factor: 6.639