| Literature DB >> 25635464 |
Lauren R Salvitti1, Susanna A Wood2, Paul McNabb3, Stephen Craig Cary4.
Abstract
Tetrodotoxin (TTX) is a potent neurotoxin found in the tissues of many taxonomically diverse organisms. Its origin has been the topic of much debate, with suggestions including endogenous production, acquisition through diet, and symbiotic bacterial synthesis. Bacterial production of TTX has been reported in isolates from marine biota, but at lower than expected concentrations. In this study, 102 strains were isolated from Pleurobranchaea maculata (Opisthobranchia) and Stylochoplana sp. (Platyhelminthes). Tetrodotoxin production was tested utilizing a recently developed sensitive method to detect the C9 base of TTX via liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Bacterial strains were characterized by sequencing a region of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene. To account for the possibility that TTX is produced by a consortium of bacteria, a series of experiments using marine broth spiked with various P. maculata tissues were undertaken. Sixteen unique strains from P. maculata and one from Stylochoplana sp. were isolated, representing eight different genera; Pseudomonadales, Actinomycetales, Oceanospirillales, Thiotrichales, Rhodobacterales, Sphingomonadales, Bacillales, and Vibrionales. Molecular fingerprinting of bacterial communities from broth experiments showed little change over the first four days. No C9 base or TTX was detected in isolates or broth experiments (past day 0), suggesting a culturable microbial source of TTX in P. maculata and Stylochoplana sp. is unlikely.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25635464 PMCID: PMC4344623 DOI: 10.3390/toxins7020255
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxins (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6651 Impact factor: 4.546
Bacteria reported to produce tetrodotoxin (TTX) or TTX like compounds.
| Ref | Source | Toxicity of Host Species/Tissue * | Bacteria | Toxicity (TTX or Related Substances) ** | Detection Method * |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | intestines: N/A | 4.3 μg·L−1 | ELISA | ||
| [ | liver: 80 MU·g−1 | 23.9 MU in 200 mL broth | mouse bioassay | ||
| [ | ovary: 125 MU·g−1 | + | HPLC, EMI-MS | ||
| [ | ovary: N/A | 1.88 μg·L−1 cultured bacteria | ELISA | ||
| [ | 1 μg·g−1 | 0.05–1.57 μg·mL−1 | LC-MS | ||
| [ | 2 × 102 MU·g−1 tissue (3.6 mg in 100 g tissue) | 11–184 ng·g−1 | competitive ELISA | ||
| 85–98 ng·g−1 | competitive ELISA | ||||
| 54 ng·g−1 | competitive ELISA | ||||
| [ | N/A | + | HPLC, GC-MS, LC-MS | ||
| [ | skin: N/A | + | HPLC | ||
| [ | ovary: 120 ± 6.2 MU·g−1 | 0.1–1.6 MU·g−1 cells | mouse bioassay | ||
| 0.5 MU·g−1 cells | mouse bioassay | ||||
| 0.1–1.6 MU·g−1 cells | mouse bioassay | ||||
| [ | intestines: 24.9 ± 24.2 MU·g−1 [ | 78.3 MU in 500 mL broth (4 × 107 cells) | mouse bioassay | ||
| ovary—100–1000 MU·g−1 [ | 105.3 MU in 500 mL broth (4 × 107 cells) | mouse bioassay | |||
| [ | Seven species of nemertean worms | N/A | + | HPLC | |
| [ | 70 ± 8 MU·g−1 | + | HPLC | ||
| [ | N/A | + | immunoassay | ||
| [ | 2–50 MU·g−1 | + | HPLC | ||
| + | HPLC | ||||
| + | HPLC | ||||
| + | HPLC | ||||
| [ | Freshwater sediment | +HPLC, GC-MS | + | HPLC | |
| + | HPLC | ||||
| + | HPLC | ||||
| + | HPLC | ||||
| [ | Marine sediment | +HPLC, GC-MS | + | HPLC | |
| [ | Deep sea sediment | 25–90 ng TTX equivalents g−1 of mud [ | + | HPLC | |
| + | HPLC | ||||
| + | HPLC | ||||
| + | HPLC | ||||
| + | HPLC | ||||
| + | HPLC | ||||
| [ | Four species of Chaetognaths (arrowworms) | 320 pg individual−1 [ | 280–790 pg·μL−1 culture medium | cell culture bioassay | |
| [ | 140–174 MU idividual−1 | + | HPLC, GC-MS | ||
| 3 MU, + | mouse bioassay, HPLC, GC-MS | ||||
| 5 MU, + | mouse bioassay, HPLC, GC-MS | ||||
| + | HPLC, GC-MS | ||||
| [ | intestine 3890 MU·g−1 | 15 MU in 250 mL culture broth, + | mouse bioassay, HPLC, GC-MS | ||
| [ | 178 MU·g−1 | 3 MU, +, + | mouse bioassay, HPLC, GC-MS | ||
| [ | 32 MU·g−1 | + | HPLC, GC-MS | ||
| [ | N/A | + | HPLC, GC-MS | ||
| [ | + TLC, eletrophoresis | + | HPLC, GC-MS | ||
| [ | N/A | + | HPLC, GC-MS |
* MU: Mouse Units; HPLC: high-performance liquid chromatography; GC-MS: gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; TLC: thin layer chromatography; EMI-MS: Electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry; ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; LC-MS: liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry; ** “+”: Denotes positive detection but no quantitative information given.
Concentrations (mg·kg−1) of tetrodotoxin (TTX) and number of bacterial strains isolated from pooled (n = 3) tissues samples of Pleurobranchaea maculata and Stylochoplana sp. collected 7 May 2013 from Matakana Island (M.I.) and Pilot Bay (P.B), New Zealand, and TTX concentrations in pooled samples of P. maculata tissue used for broth experiments collected from Illiomama Rock (I.R) (Auckland), New Zealand collected 28 September 2011.
| Sample | Location | TTX (mg·kg−1) | Bacterial Strains |
|---|---|---|---|
| M.I. | 2 | 16 | |
| M.I. | 5 | 3 | |
| M.I. | 7 | 21 | |
| M.I. | 8 | 23 | |
| M.I., P.B. | 174 | 39 | |
| I.R. | 771 | - | |
| I.R. | 136 | - | |
| I.R. | 97 | - |
Figure 1Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of 16S rRNA gene sequences of isolates from this study and related bacteria. Isolates from different organisms are color coded as follows: green = Stylochoplana sp., blue = Pleurobranchaea maculata (this study), red = P. maculata [44]. (Bootstrap values < 70 are omitted).
Figure 2Two-dimensional non-metric multidimensional scaling ordination based on Bray-Curtis similarities of Automated Ribosomal Intergenic Spacer Analysis (ARISA) fingerprints of bacterial communities at different time points in broth experiments (stress = 0.1). 0 days, day 1, day 2, day 3, day 4, + day 6, day 8, day 10, day 12, day 14. Points enclosed by solid line cluster at 40% similarity.