Literature DB >> 25634980

Functional Loss of the Inner Retina in Childhood Optic Gliomas Detected by Photopic Negative Response.

Edoardo Abed1, Marco Piccardi1, Daniela Rizzo2, Antonio Chiaretti2, Lucia Ambrosio1, Sergio Petroni3, Rosa Parrilla1, Anna Dickmann1, Riccardo Riccardi2, Benedetto Falsini1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether the Ganzfeld ERG photopic negative response (PhNR), an assay of inner retinal activity, is altered in childhood optic glioma (OPG).
METHODS: Seventeen pediatric patients with a diagnosis of OPG, established on neuro-ophthalmologic and brain/orbit magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) criteria, were enrolled. The examination protocol included determination of visual acuity (VA), fundus examination, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) measurement with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and photopic ERG. Fifteen normal children served as control group. Ten of the 17 OPG patients were retested 1 to 3 months after the first examination. Photopic ERGs were recorded after 10 minutes of light adaptation in response to a Ganzfeld flash presented on a steady light-adapting background. Amplitude and peak-time of b-wave and PhNR were measured.
RESULTS: Compared with normal values, PhNR amplitude was significantly reduced (P < 0.0001) in the OPG group. Peak-time of PhNR as well as b-wave amplitude and peak-time were similar in both patients and controls. Losses of PhNR were found in patients with involvement of either anterior or retro-chiasmatic optic pathways. Linear regression analysis showed significant positive correlation between RNFL thickness and PhNR amplitude (r2 = 0.34, P = 0.008). Mean percentage test-retest difference for PhNR amplitude and peak-time was 12% and 6%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that flash ERG PhNR can detect a loss of inner retinal function in childhood OPGs supporting the use of this technique, as an adjunct to standard psychophysical and electrophysiological tests, to monitor visual function in OPG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25634980     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.14-16235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  11 in total

1.  Intensity response function of the photopic negative response (PhNR): effect of age and test-retest reliability.

Authors:  Nabin R Joshi; Emma Ly; Suresh Viswanathan
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Photopic negative response using a handheld mini-ganzfeld stimulator in healthy adults: normative values, intra- and inter-session variability.

Authors:  Adriana Berezovsky; Rustum Karanjia; Arthur Gustavo Fernandes; Gabriel Izan Santos Botelho; Tatiane Luana Novele Bueno; Nívea Nunes Ferraz; Paula Yuri Sacai; Stuart Glenn Coupland; Alfredo Arrigo Sadun; Solange Rios Salomão
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  The photopic negative response of the Light-adapted 3.0 ERG in clinical settings.

Authors:  Gonzalo Ortiz; David Drucker; Connor Hyde; Joseph Staffetti; Jan Kremers; Radouil Tzekov
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Neuroretinal dysfunction in patients affected by neurofibromatosis type 1.

Authors:  Antonietta Moramarco; Luca Lucchino; Fabiana Mallone; Michela Marcelli; Ludovico Alisi; Vincenzo Roberti; Sandra Giustini; Alessandro Lambiase; Marcella Nebbioso
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 1.645

5.  Multifocal Electroretinogram Photopic Negative Response: A Reliable Paradigm to Detect Localized Retinal Ganglion Cells' Impairment in Retrobulbar Optic Neuritis Due to Multiple Sclerosis as a Model of Retinal Neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Lucilla Barbano; Lucia Ziccardi; Giulio Antonelli; Carolina Gabri Nicoletti; Doriana Landi; Giorgia Mataluni; Benedetto Falsini; Girolama Alessandra Marfia; Diego Centonze; Vincenzo Parisi
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-06

6.  Comparison of photopic negative response measurements in the time and time-frequency domains.

Authors:  Hansa Kundra; Jason C Park; J Jason McAnany
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Impaired Ganglion Cell Function Objectively Assessed by the Photopic Negative Response in Affected and Asymptomatic Members From Brazilian Families With Leber's Hereditary Optic Neuropathy.

Authors:  Gabriel Izan Santos Botelho; Solange Rios Salomão; Célia Harumi Tengan; Rustum Karanjia; Felipo Victor Moura; Daniel Martins Rocha; Paula Baptista Eliseo da Silva; Arthur Gustavo Fernandes; Sung Eun Song Watanabe; Paula Yuri Sacai; Rubens Belfort; Valerio Carelli; Alfredo Arrigo Sadun; Adriana Berezovsky
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Measuring the Photopic Negative Response: Viability of Skin Electrodes and Variability Across Disease Severities in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Zhichao Wu; Xavier Hadoux; Jennifer C Fan Gaskin; Marc G Sarossy; Jonathan G Crowston
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Photopic Negative Response Obtained Using a Handheld Electroretinogram Device: Determining the Optimal Measure and Repeatability.

Authors:  Zhichao Wu; Xavier Hadoux; Flora Hui; Marc G Sarossy; Jonathan G Crowston
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.283

10.  Combined Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant and Cataract Surgery in Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy: Effect on Retinal Morphology and Function.

Authors:  Angelo Maria Minnella; Martina Maceroni; Stefano Maria Picardi; Giorgio Placidi; Elisa De Siena; Stanislao Rizzo; Benedetto Falsini
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 3.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.