Literature DB >> 25634464

Variability of an ideal insertion vector for cochlear implantation.

Hayo Andrés Breinbauer1, Mark Praetorius.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Based on a three-dimensional analysis, the orientation of the basal turn of the cochlea, the disposition of the basilar membrane, and the characteristics of the hook region--all of which determine the ideal electrode insertion vector during cochlear implantation--might vary among individuals to a greater degree than previously considered. The aim of this study is to assess the variability of an ideal insertion vector among a sample of surgical candidates from a purely anatomical perspective as well as from a more intraoperative-surgical perspective.
BACKGROUND: During cochlear implantation through a cochleostomy or round window approach, the angle or vector of insertion after the first entry point seems to be related to intracochlear damage, which might correlate with anatomical and functional features.
METHODS: Three-dimensional reconstructions of the temporal bones of 50 cochlear implant candidates (a total of 100 ears) were assessed. The spatial orientation of an ideal insertion vector for a cochleostomy and a round window approach were estimated.
RESULTS: A difference as great as 60 degrees was observed for an ideal insertion vector among the subjects. From an intraoperative perspective, this variability involves pushing the electrodes "as near to the buttress" or "as near to the emergence of the corda tympani" as possible, depending on the case.
CONCLUSION: The orientation of the basal turn and the corresponding ideal electrode insertion vector vary widely among subjects. A proper preoperative estimation on a case-to-case scenario for this feature might lead to technique adaptation during insertion, possibly contributing to minimizing electrode insertion trauma and thus optimizing the anatomical and functional results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25634464     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  7 in total

1.  Impact of the surgical experience on cochleostomy location: a comparative temporal bone study between endaural and posterior tympanotomy approaches for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Clair Vandersteen; Thomas Demarcy; Coralie Roger; Eric Fontas; Charles Raffaelli; Nicholas Ayache; Hervé Delingette; Nicolas Guevara
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Variability of the mental representation of the cochlear anatomy during cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Renato Torres; Guillaume Kazmitcheff; Daniele Bernardeschi; Daniele De Seta; Jean Loup Bensimon; Evelyne Ferrary; Olivier Sterkers; Yann Nguyen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Conversations in Cochlear Implantation: The Inner Ear Therapy of Today.

Authors:  Grant Rauterkus; Anne K Maxwell; Jacob B Kahane; Jennifer J Lentz; Moises A Arriaga
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-04-29

4.  Implanting straight into cochlea risks the facial nerve: a Cartesian coordinate study.

Authors:  Anita S Deshpande; N Wendell Todd
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  An In-Vitro Insertion-Force Study of Magnetically Guided Lateral-Wall Cochlear-Implant Electrode Arrays.

Authors:  Lisandro Leon; Frank M Warren; Jake J Abbott
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  The effect of the surgical approach and cochlear implant electrode on the structural integrity of the cochlea in human temporal bones.

Authors:  Saad Jwair; Huib Versnel; Robert J Stokroos; Hans G X M Thomeer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  High-resolution Imaging of the Human Cochlea through the Round Window by means of Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Anastasiya Starovoyt; Tristan Putzeys; Jan Wouters; Nicolas Verhaert
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.