Literature DB >> 25634029

Is the Induced-membrane Technique Successful for Limb Reconstruction After Resecting Large Bone Tumors in Children?

Frank Fitoussi1, Brice Ilharreborde.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Resection of primary malignant tumors often creates large bony defects. In children, this creates reconstructive challenges, and many options have been described for limb salvage in this setting. Studies have supported the use of an induced-membrane technique after placement of a cement spacer to aid in restoration of bone anatomy. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) What complications are associated with the induced-membrane technique? (2) How often is bone healing achieved after resection greater than 15 cm using this technique? (3) What is the functional outcome of patients treated with this technique?
METHODS: We performed a retrospective evaluation of eight patients with a mean age of 13.3 years (range, 11-17 years) treated for a malignant bone tumor between 2002 and 2012 at our centers. The primary malignant tumors involved the proximal humerus, femur, and tibia. All patients were treated using the induced-membrane technique after a resection with mean bone loss of 18 cm (range, 16-23 cm). The general indication for using the induced-membrane technique during this time was a large diaphyseal defect after resection of the tumor. In addition to using cancellous graft as with the original technique, in the current patients an autogenous nonvascularized fibula was used to enhance stability. The patients were assessed at the last followup using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system. Mean followup was 47.1 months (range, 24-120 months), and none of the patients were lost to followup before 2 years.
RESULTS: A total of four unplanned reoperations were performed in these eight patients. A fracture of the reconstruction occurred in three patients and all were treated successfully, two with surgery and one with immobilization. Bone fusion was obtained in all patients within 4 to 8 months (mean, 5.6 months) after the reconstruction. The mean healing index was 0.31 month/cm of reconstruction (range, 0.23-0.5 month/cm). At last followup, the mean MSTS score was 74% (range, 67%-80%).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the modified induced-membrane technique is a reasonable alternative to other limb reconstruction techniques for bone tumors in children and has the advantage of not requiring a bone bank or an expensive metal prosthesis. Although more patients will be needed to substantiate our findings, it has become a standard part of our arsenal in the treatment of large bone defects after resection of pediatric primitive bone tumors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25634029      PMCID: PMC4419023          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-015-4164-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  28 in total

1.  [Reconstruction of the long bones by the induced membrane and spongy autograft].

Authors:  A C Masquelet; F Fitoussi; T Begue; G P Muller
Journal:  Ann Chir Plast Esthet       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 0.660

2.  Behaviour of cancellous bone graft placed in induced membranes.

Authors:  Philippe Pelissier; Dominique Martin; Jacques Baudet; Sébastien Lepreux; Alain-Charles Masquelet
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  2002-10

Review 3.  The concept of induced membrane for reconstruction of long bone defects.

Authors:  Alain C Masquelet; Thierry Begue
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.472

4.  Comparison of anterior and posterior iliac crest bone grafts in terms of harvest-site morbidity and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Elke Ahlmann; Michael Patzakis; Nikolaos Roidis; Lane Shepherd; Paul Holtom
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Primary disseminated multifocal Ewing sarcoma: results of the Euro-EWING 99 trial.

Authors:  Ruth Ladenstein; Ulrike Pötschger; Marie Cécile Le Deley; Jeremy Whelan; Michael Paulussen; Odile Oberlin; Henk van den Berg; Uta Dirksen; Lars Hjorth; Jean Michon; Ian Lewis; Alan Craft; Heribert Jürgens
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Intercalary segmental reconstruction of long bones after malignant bone tumor resection using primary methyl methacrylate cement spacer interposition and secondary bone grafting: the induced membrane technique.

Authors:  Thierry Villemagne; Christian Bonnard; Franck Accadbled; Mohamed L'kaissi; Benoit de Billy; Jérôme Sales de Gauzy
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.324

7.  Induced membranes secrete growth factors including vascular and osteoinductive factors and could stimulate bone regeneration.

Authors:  Ph Pelissier; A C Masquelet; R Bareille; S Mathoulin Pelissier; J Amedee
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Induced-membrane femur reconstruction after resection of bone malignancies: three cases of massive graft resorption in children.

Authors:  F Accadbled; P Mazeau; F Chotel; J Cottalorda; J Sales de Gauzy; R Kohler
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 2.256

9.  The mechanism of action of induced membranes in bone repair.

Authors:  Olli-Matti Aho; Petri Lehenkari; Jukka Ristiniemi; Siri Lehtonen; Juha Risteli; Hannu-Ville Leskelä
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Reconstruction of lower limb bone defects after sarcoma resection in children and adolescents using free vascularized fibular transfer.

Authors:  Tarek Abdalla El-Gammal; Amr El-Sayed; Mohammed M Kotb
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.041

View more
  12 in total

1.  Chronic infection and infected non-union of the long bones in paediatric patients: preliminary results of bone versus beta-tricalcium phosphate grafting after induced membrane formation.

Authors:  Marie Rousset; Marjolaine Walle; Ludivine Cambou; Mounira Mansour; Antoine Samba; Bruno Pereira; Ismat Ghanem; Federico Canavese
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  CORR Insights®: MRI Identification of the Osseous Extent of Pediatric Bone Sarcomas.

Authors:  Richard W Nicholas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  CORR Insights®: What Are the Complications of Allograft Reconstructions for Sarcoma Resection in Children Younger Than 10 Years at Long-term Followup?

Authors:  Richard W Nicholas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Free Vascularized Fibula Salvage of Failed CPH in Pediatric Sarcoma Patients.

Authors:  Giovanna Pires; Whitney D Moss; Jessica Luo; Ruyan Zhang; Kevin B Jones; Alvin C Kwok; Jayant P Agarwal
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2022-05-09

5.  Single-cortex is better than double-cortex in fibula grafts for large tibia bone defect in a 2-year-old child: A case report of a successful surgery and discussion of bone graft choices.

Authors:  Jianbing Li; Zhijun Pan; Shigui Yan; Xiang Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  A Novel Multiscale Mathematical Model for Building Bone Substitute Materials for Children.

Authors:  Abdennasser Chekroun; Laurent Pujo-Menjouet; Jean-Philippe Berteau
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Bone reconstruction after malignant tumour resection using a motorized lengthening intramedullary nail in adolescents: preliminary results.

Authors:  F Accadbled; C Thévenin Lemoine; E Poinsot; T Baron Trocellier; F Dauzere; J Sales de Gauzy
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 1.548

8.  Pseudocystic Osteosarcoma: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall - Case Report.

Authors:  Oussama Abcha; Ameni Ammar; Mohamed Hamadi Ben Saleh; Mahmoud Smida
Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep       Date:  2021-08

9.  Adding a Fibular Strut Allograft to Intramedullary Nail and Cancellous Autograft During Stage II of the Masquelet Technique for Segmental Femur Defects: A Technique Tip.

Authors:  Omar Ramos; Michael Mariorenzi; Joey P Johnson; Roman A Hayda
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2020-07

10.  Is three-dimensional-printed custom-made ultra-short stem with a porous structure an acceptable reconstructive alternative in peri-knee metaphysis for the tumorous bone defect?

Authors:  Jie Wang; Jingjing An; Li Min; Chongqi Tu; Minxun Lu; Yuqi Zhang; Jingqi Lin; Yi Luo; Yong Zhou
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-08-08       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.