Hanne Struyfs1, Bianca Van Broeck2, Maarten Timmers3, Erik Fransen4, Kristel Sleegers5, Christine Van Broeckhoven5, Peter P De Deyn6, Johannes R Streffer3, Marc Mercken2, Sebastiaan Engelborghs7. 1. Reference Center for Biological Markers of Dementia (BIODEM), and Biobank, Institute Born-Bunge, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. 2. Janssen Research and Development, Neuroscience Discovery, Beerse, Belgium. 3. Janssen Research and Development, Experimental Medicine Neuroscience, Beerse, Belgium. 4. StatUa Center for Statistics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. 5. Neurodegenerative Brain Diseases Group, Department of Molecular Genetics, VIB, Antwerp, Belgium Laboratory of Neurogenetics, Institute Born-Bunge, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. 6. Reference Center for Biological Markers of Dementia (BIODEM), and Biobank, Institute Born-Bunge, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium Department of Neurology and Memory Clinic, Hospital Network Antwerp (ZNA) Middelheim and Hoge Beuken, Antwerp, Belgium Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Research Center, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, The Netherlands. 7. Reference Center for Biological Markers of Dementia (BIODEM), and Biobank, Institute Born-Bunge, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium Department of Neurology and Memory Clinic, Hospital Network Antwerp (ZNA) Middelheim and Hoge Beuken, Antwerp, Belgium.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Overlapping cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers (CSF) levels between Alzheimer's disease (AD) and non-AD patients decrease differential diagnostic accuracy of the AD core CSF biomarkers. Amyloid-β (Aβ) isoforms might improve the AD versus non-AD differential diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: To determine the added diagnostic value of Aβ isoforms, Aβ(1-37), Aβ(1-38), and Aβ(1-40), as compared to the AD CSF biomarkers Aβ(1-42), T-tau, and P-tau(181P). METHODS: CSF from patients with dementia due to AD (n = 50), non-AD dementias (n = 50), mild cognitive impairment due to AD (n = 50) and non-demented controls (n = 50) was analyzed with a prototype multiplex assay using MSD detection technology. The non-AD group consisted of frontotemporal dementia (FTD; n = 17), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB; n = 17), and vascular dementia (n = 16). RESULTS: Aβ(1-37) and Aβ(1-38) increased accuracy to differentiate AD from FTD or DLB. Aβ(1-37), Aβ(1-38), and Aβ(1-40) levels correlated with Mini-Mental State Examination scores and disease duration in dementia due to AD. The Aβ(1-42)/Aβ(1-40) ratio improved diagnostic performance of Aβ(1-42) in most differential diagnostic situations. Aβ(1-42) levels were lower in APOE ε4 carriers compared to non-carriers. CONCLUSIONS: Aβ isoforms help to differentiate AD from FTD and DLB. Aβ isoforms increase diagnostic performance of Aβ(1-42). In contrast to Aβ1-42, Aβ isoforms seem to be correlated with disease severity in AD. Adding the Aβ isoforms to the current biomarker panel could enhance diagnostic accuracy.
BACKGROUND: Overlapping cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers (CSF) levels between Alzheimer's disease (AD) and non-AD patients decrease differential diagnostic accuracy of the AD core CSF biomarkers. Amyloid-β (Aβ) isoforms might improve the AD versus non-AD differential diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: To determine the added diagnostic value of Aβ isoforms, Aβ(1-37), Aβ(1-38), and Aβ(1-40), as compared to the AD CSF biomarkers Aβ(1-42), T-tau, and P-tau(181P). METHODS: CSF from patients with dementia due to AD (n = 50), non-AD dementias (n = 50), mild cognitive impairment due to AD (n = 50) and non-demented controls (n = 50) was analyzed with a prototype multiplex assay using MSD detection technology. The non-AD group consisted of frontotemporal dementia (FTD; n = 17), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB; n = 17), and vascular dementia (n = 16). RESULTS: Aβ(1-37) and Aβ(1-38) increased accuracy to differentiate AD from FTD or DLB. Aβ(1-37), Aβ(1-38), and Aβ(1-40) levels correlated with Mini-Mental State Examination scores and disease duration in dementia due to AD. The Aβ(1-42)/Aβ(1-40) ratio improved diagnostic performance of Aβ(1-42) in most differential diagnostic situations. Aβ(1-42) levels were lower in APOE ε4 carriers compared to non-carriers. CONCLUSIONS: Aβ isoforms help to differentiate AD from FTD and DLB. Aβ isoforms increase diagnostic performance of Aβ(1-42). In contrast to Aβ1-42, Aβ isoforms seem to be correlated with disease severity in AD. Adding the Aβ isoforms to the current biomarker panel could enhance diagnostic accuracy.
Authors: Piotr Lewczuk; Peter Riederer; Sid E O'Bryant; Marcel M Verbeek; Bruno Dubois; Pieter Jelle Visser; Kurt A Jellinger; Sebastiaan Engelborghs; Alfredo Ramirez; Lucilla Parnetti; Clifford R Jack; Charlotte E Teunissen; Harald Hampel; Alberto Lleó; Frank Jessen; Lidia Glodzik; Mony J de Leon; Anne M Fagan; José Luis Molinuevo; Willemijn J Jansen; Bengt Winblad; Leslie M Shaw; Ulf Andreasson; Markus Otto; Brit Mollenhauer; Jens Wiltfang; Martin R Turner; Inga Zerr; Ron Handels; Alexander G Thompson; Gunilla Johansson; Natalia Ermann; John Q Trojanowski; Ilker Karaca; Holger Wagner; Patrick Oeckl; Linda van Waalwijk van Doorn; Maria Bjerke; Dimitrios Kapogiannis; H Bea Kuiperij; Lucia Farotti; Yi Li; Brian A Gordon; Stéphane Epelbaum; Stephanie J B Vos; Catharina J M Klijn; William E Van Nostrand; Carolina Minguillon; Matthias Schmitz; Carla Gallo; Andrea Lopez Mato; Florence Thibaut; Simone Lista; Daniel Alcolea; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Johannes Kornhuber Journal: World J Biol Psychiatry Date: 2017-10-27 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Min Shi; Lu Tang; Jon B Toledo; Carmen Ginghina; Hua Wang; Patrick Aro; Poul H Jensen; Daniel Weintraub; Alice S Chen-Plotkin; David J Irwin; Murray Grossman; Leo McCluskey; Lauren B Elman; David A Wolk; Edward B Lee; Leslie M Shaw; John Q Trojanowski; Jing Zhang Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2018-03-28 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Daniel Alcolea; David J Irwin; Ignacio Illán-Gala; Laia Muñoz; Jordi Clarimón; Corey T McMillan; Juan Fortea; Rafael Blesa; Edward B Lee; John Q Trojanowski; Murray Grossman; Alberto Lleó Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2018-10-08 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Rebecca F Rosen; Yasushi Tomidokoro; Aaron S Farberg; Jeromy Dooyema; Brian Ciliax; Todd M Preuss; Thomas A Neubert; Jorge A Ghiso; Harry LeVine; Lary C Walker Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2016-05-02 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Elisabeth H Thijssen; Inge M W Verberk; Jeroen Vanbrabant; Anne Koelewijn; Hans Heijst; Philip Scheltens; Wiesje van der Flier; Hugo Vanderstichele; Erik Stoops; Charlotte E Teunissen Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-05-06 Impact factor: 4.379