AIM: Corneal confocal microscopy is a promising screening method for diabetic neuropathy. Although much research in this field has been accomplished, we aimed to determine and confirm the known clinical and eyewear variables associated with the parameters of corneal confocal microscopy specifically in healthy volunteers, in particular associations with corneal nerve fibre length. METHODS: Clinical characteristics, electrophysiological examination and a general clinical eye history were collected from 64 healthy volunteers. Corneal confocal microscopy was performed to determine corneal nerve fibre length, corneal nerve branch density, corneal nerve fibre density and tortuosity coefficient. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis was used to determine clinical variables associated with corneal nerve fibre length parameters. RESULTS: We observed that corneal nerve fibre length has a broad distribution in healthy volunteers (18 ± 4 mm/mm(2), 95% confidence interval, 12.3-25.7 mm/mm(2)). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that HbA(1c) was the only independent clinical factor to account for variations in corneal nerve fibre length, independent of age and status of contact lens wear. CONCLUSIONS: This study does not provide convincing evidence that corneal nerve fibre length is independently associated with age or the wearing of contact lenses, and that these factors are therefore unlikely to hinder valid screening for polyneuropathies such as diabetic neuropathy. Furthermore, the strong inverse association of corneal nerve fibre length with glycaemic exposure may support the use of this parameter to detect subclinical pre-diabetic nerve injury.
AIM: Corneal confocal microscopy is a promising screening method for diabetic neuropathy. Although much research in this field has been accomplished, we aimed to determine and confirm the known clinical and eyewear variables associated with the parameters of corneal confocal microscopy specifically in healthy volunteers, in particular associations with corneal nerve fibre length. METHODS: Clinical characteristics, electrophysiological examination and a general clinical eye history were collected from 64 healthy volunteers. Corneal confocal microscopy was performed to determine corneal nerve fibre length, corneal nerve branch density, corneal nerve fibre density and tortuosity coefficient. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis was used to determine clinical variables associated with corneal nerve fibre length parameters. RESULTS: We observed that corneal nerve fibre length has a broad distribution in healthy volunteers (18 ± 4 mm/mm(2), 95% confidence interval, 12.3-25.7 mm/mm(2)). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that HbA(1c) was the only independent clinical factor to account for variations in corneal nerve fibre length, independent of age and status of contact lens wear. CONCLUSIONS: This study does not provide convincing evidence that corneal nerve fibre length is independently associated with age or the wearing of contact lenses, and that these factors are therefore unlikely to hinder valid screening for polyneuropathies such as diabetic neuropathy. Furthermore, the strong inverse association of corneal nerve fibre length with glycaemic exposure may support the use of this parameter to detect subclinical pre-diabetic nerve injury.
Authors: Ioannis N Petropoulos; Uazman Alam; Hassan Fadavi; Andrew Marshall; Omar Asghar; Mohammad A Dabbah; Xin Chen; James Graham; Georgios Ponirakis; Andrew J M Boulton; Mitra Tavakoli; Rayaz A Malik Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-04-03 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Mitra Tavakoli; Maryam Ferdousi; Ioannis N Petropoulos; Julie Morris; Nicola Pritchard; Andrey Zhivov; Dan Ziegler; Danièle Pacaud; Kenneth Romanchuk; Bruce A Perkins; Leif E Lovblom; Vera Bril; J Robinson Singleton; Gordon Smith; Andrew J M Boulton; Nathan Efron; Rayaz A Malik Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2015-01-29 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Evan J H Lewis; Bruce A Perkins; Leif E Lovblom; Richard P Bazinet; Thomas M S Wolever; Vera Bril Journal: Neurology Date: 2017-05-17 Impact factor: 9.910