Literature DB >> 25633195

Imaging of single cell responses to ER stress indicates that the relative dynamics of IRE1/XBP1 and PERK/ATF4 signalling rather than a switch between signalling branches determine cell survival.

F Walter1, J Schmid1, H Düssmann1, C G Concannon1, J H M Prehn1.   

Abstract

An accumulation of misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) triggers the unfolded protein response (UPR) mediated via the activation of three transmembrane proteins IRE1, PERK and ATF6. Signalling through these proteins is aimed at enhancing the ER folding capacity and reducing the folding load. If these processes fail to re-establish protein homeostasis within the ER, then cell death prevails via apoptosis. How the shift from pro-survival to pro-apoptotic signalling is regulated remains unclear with both IRE1 and PERK signalling associated with pro-survival as well as pro-apoptotic signalling. To investigate the temporal activation of IRE1 and PERK in live cells and their relationship to cellular fate, we devised single cell reporters for both ER stress signalling branches. SH-SY5Y neural cells stably expressing these fluorescent protein reporter constructs to monitor IRE1-splicing activity and PERK-mediated ATF4-translation were imaged using single cell and high content time lapse live cell microscopy. We could correlate an early onset and attenuation of XBP1 splicing in the IRE1-reporter cells as cytoprotective. Indeed, silencing of IRE1 expression using shRNA inhibited splicing of XBP1 resulting in an early onset of cell death. In contrast, in the PERK-reporter cells, we observed that a slow rate of ATF4-translation and late re-initiation of general translation coincided with cells which were resistant to ER stress-induced cell death. Interestingly, whereas silencing of PERK did not affect overall levels of cell death in response to ER stress, it did increase sensitivity to ER stressors at early time points following treatment. Our results suggest that apoptosis activation in response to ER stress is not caused by a preferential activation of a single UPR branch, or by a switch from one branch to the other. Rather, our data indicated that the relative timing of IRE1 and PERK signalling determines the shift from cell survival to apoptosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25633195      PMCID: PMC4532775          DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2014.241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Death Differ        ISSN: 1350-9047            Impact factor:   15.828


  30 in total

1.  Neuronal apoptosis induced by endoplasmic reticulum stress is regulated by ATF4-CHOP-mediated induction of the Bcl-2 homology 3-only member PUMA.

Authors:  Zohreh Galehdar; Patrick Swan; Benjamin Fuerth; Steven M Callaghan; David S Park; Sean P Cregan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  IRE1 signaling affects cell fate during the unfolded protein response.

Authors:  Jonathan H Lin; Han Li; Douglas Yasumura; Hannah R Cohen; Chao Zhang; Barbara Panning; Kevan M Shokat; Matthew M Lavail; Peter Walter
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Gadd153 sensitizes cells to endoplasmic reticulum stress by down-regulating Bcl2 and perturbing the cellular redox state.

Authors:  K D McCullough; J L Martindale; L O Klotz; T Y Aw; N J Holbrook
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis.

Authors:  Johannes Schindelin; Ignacio Arganda-Carreras; Erwin Frise; Verena Kaynig; Mark Longair; Tobias Pietzsch; Stephan Preibisch; Curtis Rueden; Stephan Saalfeld; Benjamin Schmid; Jean-Yves Tinevez; Daniel James White; Volker Hartenstein; Kevin Eliceiri; Pavel Tomancak; Albert Cardona
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  IRE1alpha kinase activation modes control alternate endoribonuclease outputs to determine divergent cell fates.

Authors:  Dan Han; Alana G Lerner; Lieselotte Vande Walle; John-Paul Upton; Weihong Xu; Andrew Hagen; Bradley J Backes; Scott A Oakes; Feroz R Papa
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Mammalian endoplasmic reticulum stress sensor IRE1 signals by dynamic clustering.

Authors:  Han Li; Alexei V Korennykh; Shannon L Behrman; Peter Walter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  CHOP potentially co-operates with FOXO3a in neuronal cells to regulate PUMA and BIM expression in response to ER stress.

Authors:  Arindam P Ghosh; Barbara J Klocke; Mary E Ballestas; Kevin A Roth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Globally optimal stitching of tiled 3D microscopic image acquisitions.

Authors:  Stephan Preibisch; Stephan Saalfeld; Pavel Tomancak
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Divergent effects of PERK and IRE1 signaling on cell viability.

Authors:  Jonathan H Lin; Han Li; Yuhong Zhang; David Ron; Peter Walter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Regulated Ire1-dependent decay of messenger RNAs in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Julie Hollien; Jonathan H Lin; Han Li; Nicole Stevens; Peter Walter; Jonathan S Weissman
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  47 in total

1.  The Combination of Alcohol and Cigarette Smoke Induces Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Cell Death in Pancreatic Acinar Cells.

Authors:  Aurelia Lugea; Andreas Gerloff; Hsin-Yuan Su; Zhihong Xu; Ariel Go; Cheng Hu; Samuel W French; Jeremy S Wilson; Minoti V Apte; Richard T Waldron; Stephen J Pandol
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  A gene signal amplifier platform for monitoring the unfolded protein response.

Authors:  Carlos A Origel Marmolejo; Bhagyashree Bachhav; Sahiti D Patibandla; Alexander L Yang; Laura Segatori
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 15.040

Review 3.  Proteostasis control by the unfolded protein response.

Authors:  Claudio Hetz; Eric Chevet; Scott A Oakes
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 28.824

4.  Intercellular transmission of the unfolded protein response promotes survival and drug resistance in cancer cells.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Rodvold; Kevin T Chiu; Nobuhiko Hiramatsu; Julia K Nussbacher; Valentina Galimberti; Navin R Mahadevan; Karl Willert; Jonathan H Lin; Maurizio Zanetti
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 8.192

5.  Proteasome activity modulates amyloid toxicity.

Authors:  John Galvin; Elizabeth Curran; Francisco Arteaga; Alicia Goossens; Nicki Aubuchon-Endsley; Michael A McMurray; Jeffrey Moore; Kirk C Hansen; Heidi J Chial; Huntington Potter; Jeffrey L Brodsky; Christina M Coughlan
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  A Platform Technology for Monitoring the Unfolded Protein Response.

Authors:  Bhagyashree Bachhav; Carlos A Origel Marmolejo; Yafet Arefeayne; Laura Segatori
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

7.  ER stress signaling has an activating transcription factor 6α (ATF6)-dependent "off-switch".

Authors:  Franziska Walter; Aisling O'Brien; Caoimhín G Concannon; Heiko Düssmann; Jochen H M Prehn
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Glucose deprivation induces chemoresistance in colorectal cancer cells by increasing ATF4 expression.

Authors:  Ya-Ling Hu; Yuan Yin; He-Yong Liu; Yu-Yang Feng; Ze-Hua Bian; Le-Yuan Zhou; Ji-Wei Zhang; Bo-Jian Fei; Yu-Gang Wang; Zhao-Hui Huang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Erratum: Proteostasis control by the unfolded protein response.

Authors:  Claudio Hetz; Eric Chevet; Scott A Oakes
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 28.824

10.  Intersection of the ATF6 and XBP1 ER stress pathways in mouse islet cells.

Authors:  Rohit B Sharma; Christine Darko; Laura C Alonso
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.