| Literature DB >> 25631933 |
Xu Qiao1, Shuikuan Bei2, Chunjie Li2, Yan Dong3, Haigang Li2, Peter Christie2, Fusuo Zhang2, Junling Zhang2.
Abstract
The mechanistic understanding of the dynamic processes linking nutrient acquisition and biomass production of competing individuals can be instructive in optimizing intercropping systems. Here, we examine the effect of inoculation withEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25631933 PMCID: PMC4309967 DOI: 10.1038/srep08122
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Cumulative shoot biomass production (a, b), N (c, d) and P uptake (e, f) by wheat (a, c, e) and faba bean plants (b, d, f).
Each symbol represents a single harvest and is the mean of three replicates. Curves are derived from Eqn 1 using mean parameter estimates. NM-SW, uninoculated sole wheat; NM-MW, uninoculated wheat mixed with faba bean; Fm-SW, inoculated sole wheat; Fm-MW, inoculated wheat mixed with faba bean. Similar symbols are also used for faba bean plants.
Mean values of the parameters in Eqn 1 fitted to temporal changes in cumulative shoot biomass production and N and P uptake of wheat and faba bean plants derived from Fig. 1
| Wheat | Faba bean | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | NM-SW | NM-MW | Fm-SW | Fm-MW | NM-SF | NM-MF | Fm-SF | Fm-MF | |
| Biomass | r (d−1) | 0.122 | 0.128 | 0.126 | 0.124 | 0.081 | 0.077 | 0.089 | 0.085 |
| Ymax (g) | 12.94 | 9.49 | 13.84 | 9.24 | 4.61 | 4.21 | 12.42 | 6.99 | |
| R2 | 0.991 | 0.989 | 0.999 | 0.986 | 0.979 | 0.925 | 0.938 | 0.878 | |
| N | r (d−1) | 0.114 | 0.124 | 0.115 | 0.129 | 0.071 | 0.052 | 0.076 | 0.052 |
| Ymax (mg) | 231.1 | 169.3 | 275.1 | 164.3 | 138.3 | 111.7 | 331.3 | 236.0 | |
| R2 | 0.972 | 0.957 | 0.984 | 0.959 | 0.921 | 0.938 | 0.983 | 0.941 | |
| P | r (d−1) | 0.085 | 0.111 | 0.100 | 0.128 | 0.083 | 0.021 | 0.088 | 0.059 |
| Ymax (mg) | 9.03 | 7.87 | 17.04 | 10.14 | 2.74 | 3.92 | 16.62 | 8.12 | |
| R2 | 0.894 | 0.873 | 0.991 | 0.938 | 0.713 | 0.693 | 0.967 | 0.955 | |
NM-SW, uninoculated sole wheat; NM-MW, uninoculated wheat mixed with faba bean; Fm-SW, inoculated sole wheat; Fm-MW, inoculated wheat mixed with faba bean. Similar symbols are also used for faba bean plants. Logistic models accounted for 87.8–99.9% of the variation in biomass data, and for 92.1–98.4% and 69.3–99.1% of the variation in N and P uptake data. r, rate constant of per capita biomass production or net N and P uptake; Ymax, maximum attainable per capita biomass production or net N and P uptake; R2 indicates the goodness-of-fit determination coefficient accounted for by each linear model.
Figure 2Mean instantaneous per capita rates of shoot biomass production (a, b), N (c, d) and P production (e, f) by wheat (a, c, e) and faba bean plants (b, d, f) derived as the slopes of the logistic models fitted to cumulative data, derived using mean values of the rate constant, r (Table 1).
Statistical analysis of maximum instantaneous rates and their timings are presented in Table 2. NM-SW, uninoculated sole wheat; NM-MW, uninoculated wheat mixed with faba bean; Fm-SW, inoculated sole wheat; Fm-MW, inoculated wheat mixed with faba bean. Similar symbols are also used for faba bean plants.
Estimated times (Tmax) and rates (Imax) of mean maximum instantaneous biomass production and uptake of N and P by wheat and faba bean plants. The values are derived from Eqn1
| Wheat | Faba bean | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | NM-SW | NM-MW | Fm-SW | Fm-MW | NM-SF | NM-MF | Fm-SF | Fm-MF | |
| Biomass | Tmax (d) | 59 | 57 | 58 | 57 | 54 | 58 | 63 | 60 |
| Imax (g/d) | 0.396 | 0.303 | 0.437 | 0.286 | 0.093 | 0.081 | 0.277 | 0.149 | |
| N | Tmax (d) | 51 | 48 | 51 | 47 | 47 | 52 | 58 | 68 |
| Imax (mg/d) | 6.57 | 5.24 | 7.91 | 5.32 | 2.44 | 1.46 | 6.27 | 3.07 | |
| P | Tmax (d) | 57 | 51 | 59 | 51 | 30 | 46 | 54 | 52 |
| Imax (mg/d) | 0.192 | 0.219 | 0.427 | 0.325 | 0.057 | 0.020 | 0.364 | 0.119 | |
NM-SW, uninoculated sole wheat; NM-MW, uninoculated wheat mixed with faba bean; Fm-SW, inoculated sole wheat; Fm-MW, inoculated wheat mixed with faba bean. Similar symbols are also used for faba bean plants.
Growth and development of wheat and faba bean plants grown either separately or in mixture, inoculated with F. mosseae or uninoculated (mean ± SD, n = 18)
| Wheat | Faba bean | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | NM-SW | NM-MW | Fm-SW | Fm-MW | NM-SF | NM-MF | Fm-SF | Fm-MF |
| Tillers (no. plant−1) | 5.9 ± 1.1a | 4.1 ± 0.5b | 5.6 ± 1.0a | 4.0 ± 0.7b | - | - | - | - |
| Effective spikes (no. plant−1) | 4.0 ± 0.6a | 3.2 ± 0.6b | 4.3 ± 0.6a | 3.1 ± 0.5b | - | - | - | - |
| Flowers (no. plant−1) | - | - | - | - | 8.9 ± 4.9c | 6.7 ± 3.2c | 18.2 ± 5.3a | 13.8 ± 4.0b |
| Pods (no. plant−1) | - | - | - | - | 1.3 ± 0.5c | 1.1 ± 0.3c | 3.6 ± 0.5a | 2.0 ± 0.5b |
| Stem diameter (mm) | 4.0 ± 0.2a | 3.9 ± 0.3a | 4.1 ± 0.3a | 3.9 ± 0.1a | 4.0 ± 0.2b | 3.7 ± 0.3b | 4.6 ± 0.4a | 3.9 ± 0.2b |
| Plant height (cm) | 86.4 ± 4.2a | 86.7 ± 2.7a | 82.2 ± 4.1a | 82.4 ± 5.8a | 57.2 ± 5.9c | 56.4 ± 4.3c | 73.9 ± 7.0a | 67.4 ± 7.7b |
NM-SW, uninoculated sole wheat; NM-MW, uninoculated wheat mixed with faba bean; Fm-SW, inoculated sole wheat;
Fm-MW, inoculated wheat mixed with faba bean. Similar symbols are also used for faba bean plants. Values with the same letter within each row are not significantly different for wheat and faba bean plants, respectively (one-way ANOVA, P< 0.05).
Figure 3Green leaves and dead leaves per plant of wheat and faba bean plants (mean ± SD, n = 3) grown either separately or in mixture, inoculated with F. mosseae or uninoculated.
NM-SW, uninoculated sole wheat; NM-MW, uninoculated wheat mixed with faba bean; Fm-SW, inoculated sole wheat; Fm-MW, inoculated wheat mixed with faba bean. Similar symbols are also used for faba bean plants. * Indicates significant difference between inoculated and uninoculated treatments at P <0.05.
Figure 4Soil Nmin and Olsen-P concentrations at each harvest of wheat and faba bean plants (mean ± SD, n = 3) grown in either separately or in mixture, inoculated with F. mosseae or uninoculated.
NM-SW, uninoculated sole wheat; NM-SF, uninoculated sole faba bean; NM-Mix, uninoculated mixture; Fm-SW, inoculated sole wheat; Fm-SF, inoculated sole faba bean; Fm-Mix, inoculated mixture. * Indicates significant difference between inoculated and uninoculated treatments at P< 0.05.
Rhizosphere pH values, acid phosphatase activities and carboxylate concentrations of wheat and faba bean plants grown in either separately or in mixture, inoculated with F. mossese or uninoculated (mean ± SD, n = 6)
| Wheat | Faba bean | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | DAS | NM- SW | NM- MW | Fm- SW | Fm- MW | NM-SF | NM-MF | Fm- SF | Fm- MF |
| pH | 30d | 7.6 ± 0.1a | 7.6 ± 0.2a | 7.4 ± 0.1a | 7.8 ± 0.4a | 7.3 ± 0.1a | 7.1 ± 0.1a | 7.0 ± 0.3a | 7.3 ± 0.1a |
| 70d | 7.9 ± 0.0a | 8.1 ± 0.2a | 8.0 ± 0.1a | 8.1 ± 0.1a | 7.8 ± 0.0a | 7.8 ± 0.0a | 7.5 ± 0.2b | 7.4 ± 0.2b | |
| APA µmol PNP h−1(g−1 soil) | 30d | 1.1 ± 0.6a | 1.6 ± 0.7a | 3.2 ± 1.1a | 1.9 ± 1.6a | 11.9 ± 2.8b | 20.8 ± 2.5a | 28.5 ± 3.7a | 23.8 ± 6.3a |
| 70d | 1.8 ± 0.4a | 2.9 ± 2.6a | 3.7 ± 0.6a | 3.8 ± 2.2a | 10.6 ± 4.8a | 6.2 ± 2.1a | 10.4 ± 1.9a | 8.2 ± 4.6a | |
| Malate µmol (g−1 soil) | 30d | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.7 ± 3.3a | 11.7 ± 10.6a | 6.8 ± 6.6a | 12.1 ± 7.2a |
| 70d | 1.8 ± 2.6b | 4.8 ± 4.5b | 10.3 ± 3.3ab | 37.8 ± 46.5a | 2.9 ± 2.8b | 40.6 ± 33.3b | 39.6 ± 21.6b | 103.5 ± 61.6a | |
| Citrate µmol (g−1 soil) | 30d | 2.0 ± 0.9a | 2.0 ± 0.6a | 1.0 ± 0.6b | 2.4 ± 1.0a | 7.1 ± 3.7b | 10.7 ± 5.0ab | 15.1 ± 4.3a | 13.6 ± 4.8a |
| 70d | 10.8 ± 2.8a | 9.2 ± 2.5a | 6.8 ± 1.8a | 19.2 ± 19.0a | 14.8 ± 9.2b | 55.9 ± 33.8a | 27.2 ± 11.3ab | 50.9 ± 33.6a | |
NM-SW, uninoculated sole wheat; NM-MW, uninoculated wheat mixed with faba bean; Fm-SW, inoculated sole wheat; Fm-MW, inoculated wheat mixed with faba bean. Similar symbols are also used for faba bean plants. APA, acid phosphatase activities. Values with the same letter within each row are not significantly different for wheat and faba bean plants, respectively (P<0.05).
Figure 5Belowground interspecific competitive/facilitative processes in mixed crop production systems.
The diagram shows how AMF alter interspecific plant interactions directly or indirectly via their effects on nutrient acquisition to attain mutually beneficial strategies: (1) Depletion of Nmin by wheat plants facilitating N2 fixation of mycorrhizal faba bean plants; Promotion of N2 fixation as a result of improved P nutrition by inoculation; Enhanced P uptake of wheat plants by inoculation; (2) Uptake of inorganic P by wheat plants enhancing the exploration of inorganic and possibly also inorganic P by mycorrhizal faba bean plants; (3) Enhancement of rhizosphere activity (pH, carboxylates and acid phosphatase activities) of faba bean by inoculation; (4) possible N (P?) transfer by common mycorrhizal networks (CMNs) between faba bean and wheat plants.