Michele Diana1,2, Lee L Swanström3,4, Peter Halvax5, Andras Lègner5, Yu-Yin Liu6, Amilcar Alzaga5, Antonio D'Urso7, Jacques Marescaux6,5,7. 1. IRCAD, Research Institute Against Cancer of Digestive System, Strasbourg, France. michele.diana@ircad.fr. 2. IHU-Strasbourg, University Institute for Minimally-Invasive Hybrid Image-Guided Therapies, 1, Place de l'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg, France. michele.diana@ircad.fr. 3. IHU-Strasbourg, University Institute for Minimally-Invasive Hybrid Image-Guided Therapies, 1, Place de l'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg, France. lee.swanstrom@ihu-strasbourg.eu. 4. Department of General, Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France. lee.swanstrom@ihu-strasbourg.eu. 5. IHU-Strasbourg, University Institute for Minimally-Invasive Hybrid Image-Guided Therapies, 1, Place de l'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg, France. 6. IRCAD, Research Institute Against Cancer of Digestive System, Strasbourg, France. 7. Department of General, Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic suturing reduces stent migration, but is challenging and time-consuming. We compare endoscopic suturing versus anchoring with a novel over-the-scope clip (Padlock) to fix esophageal stents. Additionally, the first clinical case of Padlock stent fixation is reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A fully covered esophageal stent was placed in 11 pigs and fixed with one figure-of-eight suture (n = 5) or with a Padlock (n = 4) or not fixed (controls; n = 2). The force required to mobilize the stent was recorded. CLINICAL CASE: an esophageal stent was fixed with a Padlock and endoscopically removed 1 month later, in an 82-year-old patient. RESULTS: Mean force (newton) to mobilize the stent was similar after suturing and Padlock fixation (23.99 ± 14.91 vs. 19.97 ± 7.62; p = 0.32). In controls was 7 and 11 Newtons. Suturing time (seconds) was longer than Padlock application (455.4 ± 144.83 vs. 155 ± 12.9; p = 0.002). CLINICAL CASE: stent fixation was feasible and uncomplicated. Removal was easy, and only mild bleeding occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Padlock is faster than endoscopic suturing and achieves similar stent fixation. The first clinical case confirms the feasibility of the method.
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic suturing reduces stent migration, but is challenging and time-consuming. We compare endoscopic suturing versus anchoring with a novel over-the-scope clip (Padlock) to fix esophageal stents. Additionally, the first clinical case of Padlock stent fixation is reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A fully covered esophageal stent was placed in 11 pigs and fixed with one figure-of-eight suture (n = 5) or with a Padlock (n = 4) or not fixed (controls; n = 2). The force required to mobilize the stent was recorded. CLINICAL CASE: an esophageal stent was fixed with a Padlock and endoscopically removed 1 month later, in an 82-year-old patient. RESULTS: Mean force (newton) to mobilize the stent was similar after suturing and Padlock fixation (23.99 ± 14.91 vs. 19.97 ± 7.62; p = 0.32). In controls was 7 and 11 Newtons. Suturing time (seconds) was longer than Padlock application (455.4 ± 144.83 vs. 155 ± 12.9; p = 0.002). CLINICAL CASE: stent fixation was feasible and uncomplicated. Removal was easy, and only mild bleeding occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Padlock is faster than endoscopic suturing and achieves similar stent fixation. The first clinical case confirms the feasibility of the method.
Authors: David J Desilets; John R Romanelli; David B Earle; Christopher N Chapman Journal: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 1.878
Authors: Bruno da Costa Martins; Felipe Alves Retes; Bruno Frederico Medrado; Marcelo Simas de Lima; Caterina Maria Pia Simione Pennacchi; Fabio Shiguehissa Kawaguti; Adriana Vaz Safatle-Ribeiro; Ricardo Sato Uemura; Fauze Maluf-Filho Journal: World J Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2014-02-16
Authors: Christopher C Thompson; Bipan Chand; Yang K Chen; Daniel C DeMarco; Larry Miller; Michael Schweitzer; Richard I Rothstein; David B Lautz; James Slattery; Michele B Ryan; Stacy Brethauer; Phillip Schauer; Mack C Mitchell; Anthony Starpoli; Gregory B Haber; Marc F Catalano; Steven Edmundowicz; Annette M Fagnant; Lee M Kaplan; Mitchell S Roslin Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2013-04-05 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Ossamu Okazaki; Wanderley M Bernardo; Vitor O Brunaldi; Cesar C de Clemente Junior; Maurício K Minata; Diogo T H de Moura; Thiago F de Souza; Josemberg Marins Campos; Marco Aurélio Santo; Eduardo G H de Moura Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Lea Fayad; Cem Simsek; Roberto Oleas; Yervant Ichkhanian; Georges E Fayad; Saowanee Ngamreungphong; Michael Schweitzer; Andreas Oberbach; Anthony N Kalloo; Mouen A Khashab; Vivek Kumbhari Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Sivesh K Kamarajah; James Bundred; Gary Spence; Andrew Kennedy; Bobby V M Dasari; Ewen A Griffiths Journal: World J Surg Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 3.352