| Literature DB >> 25630713 |
Takashi Kubo1, Takashi Akasaka2, Takashi Tanimoto2, Masamichi Takano3, Yoshitane Seino4, Kenya Nasu5, Tomonori Itoh6, Kyoichi Mizuno7, Hiroyuki Okura8, Toshiro Shinke9, Jun-Ichi Kotani10, Shigenori Ito11, Hiroyoshi Yokoi12, Toshiya Muramatsu13, Masato Nakamura14, Shinsuke Nanto10.
Abstract
Even in the drug-eluting stent era, diabetes mellitus (DM) patients have high incidences of restenosis and repeat revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention. The aim of this study was to compare vascular response after stent implantation between sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) by using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in DM patients as well as in non-DM patients. In the Japan-Drug Eluting Stents Evaluation; a Randomized Trial (J-DESsERT), the OCT sub-study enrolled 75 patients who underwent 8 months follow-up imaging after SES or PES implantation. Mean neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) thickness was significantly thinner in SES than PES in the DM group (77 ± 47 vs. 201 ± 114 μm, p < 0.001) and in the non-DM group (84 ± 37 vs. 212 ± 128 μm, p < 0.001). Unevenness of NIH thickness in longitudinal axis was significantly smaller in SES than PES in the DM group (348 ± 191 vs. 726 ± 385 μm, p < 0.001) and in the non-DM group (344 ± 174 vs. 679 ± 314 μm, p < 0.001). The percentage of uncovered struts was significantly greater in SES than PES in the DM group (24 ± 4 vs. 9 ± 14 %, p < 0.001) and in the non-DM group (16 ± 16 vs. 3 ± 4 %, p = 0.002). Compared with PES, SES showed more potent NIH inhibition in DM patients as well as in non-DM patients.Entities:
Keywords: Drug-eluting stents; Neointima; Optical coherence tomography; Percutaneous coronary intervention
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25630713 DOI: 10.1007/s00380-015-0636-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heart Vessels ISSN: 0910-8327 Impact factor: 2.037