Literature DB >> 25630672

Impact of commercial housing systems and nutrient and energy intake on laying hen performance and egg quality parameters.

D M Karcher1, D R Jones2, Z Abdo3, Y Zhao4, T A Shepherd4, H Xin4.   

Abstract

The US egg industry is exploring alternative housing systems for laying hens. However, limited published research related to cage-free aviary systems and enriched colony cages exists related to production, egg quality, and hen nutrition. The laying hen's nutritional requirements and resulting productivity are well established with the conventional cage system, but diminutive research is available in regards to alternative housing systems. The restrictions exist with limited availability of alternative housing systems in research settings and the considerable expense for increased bird numbers in a replicate due to alternative housing system design. Therefore, the objective of the current study was to evaluate the impact of nutrient and energy intake on production and egg quality parameters from laying hens housed at a commercial facility. Lohmann LSL laying hens were housed in three systems: enriched colony cage, cage-free aviary, and conventional cage at a single commercial facility. Daily production records were collected along with dietary changes during 15 production periods (28-d each). Eggs were analyzed for shell strength, shell thickness, Haugh unit, vitelline membrane properties, and egg solids each period. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) coupled with a principal components analysis (PCA) approach was utilized to assess the impact of nutritional changes on production parameters and monitored egg quality factors. The traits of hen-day production and mortality had a response only in the PCA 2 direction. This finds that as house temperature and Met intake increases, there is an inflection point at which hen-day egg production is negatively effected. Dietary changes more directly influenced shell parameters, vitelline membrane parameters, and egg total solids as opposed to laying hen housing system. Therefore, further research needs to be conducted in controlled research settings on laying hen nutrient and energy intake in the alternative housing systems and resulting impact on egg quality measures.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Poultry Science Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cage-free aviary; conventional cage; egg quality; enriched colony cage; nutrition

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25630672      PMCID: PMC4990894          DOI: 10.3382/ps/peu078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  19 in total

1.  Egg quality in furnished cages for laying hens--effects of crack reduction measures and hybrid.

Authors:  H Wall; R Tauson
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Production performance and proportion of nest eggs in layer hybrids housed in different designs of furnished cages.

Authors:  H Wall
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Effects on egg quality traits of genotype and diets with mussel meal or wheat-distillers dried grains with solubles.

Authors:  H Wall; L Jönsson; L Johansson
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Dietary protein effects on hen performance and nitrogen excretion.

Authors:  J D Latshaw; L Zhao
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Hen welfare in different housing systems.

Authors:  D C Lay; R M Fulton; P Y Hester; D M Karcher; J B Kjaer; J A Mench; B A Mullens; R C Newberry; C J Nicol; N P O'Sullivan; R E Porter
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Production, egg quality, bone strength, claw length, and keel bone deformities of laying hens housed in furnished cages with different group sizes.

Authors:  A Vits; D Weitzenbürger; H Hamann; O Distl
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Monitoring of eggshell breakage and eggshell strength in different production chains of consumption eggs.

Authors:  K Mertens; F Bamelis; B Kemps; B Kamers; E Verhoelst; B De Ketelaere; M Bain; E Decuypere; J De Baerdemaeker
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Effects of dietary energy content on the performance of laying hens in furnished and conventional cages.

Authors:  E Valkonen; E Venäläinen; L Rossow; J Valaja
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Evaluation of limit feeding varying levels of distillers dried grains with solubles in non-feed-withdrawal molt programs for laying hens.

Authors:  L Mejia; E T Meyer; D L Studer; P L Utterback; C W Utterback; C M Parsons; K W Koelkebeck
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Effects of calcium diet supplements on egg strength in conventional and furnished cages, and effects of 2 different nest floor materials.

Authors:  E Valkonen; E Venäläinen; L Rossow; J Valaja
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  8 in total

1.  Effects of the Use of a Combination of Two Bacillus Species on Performance, Egg Quality, Small Intestinal Mucosal Morphology, and Cecal Microbiota Profile in Aging Laying Hens.

Authors:  Jiajun Yang; Kai Zhan; Minhong Zhang
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  The Unique Features of Proteins Depicting the Chicken Amniotic Fluid.

Authors:  Mylène Da Silva; Clara Dombre; Aurélien Brionne; Philippe Monget; Magali Chessé; Marion De Pauw; Maryse Mills; Lucie Combes-Soia; Valérie Labas; Nicolas Guyot; Yves Nys; Sophie Réhault-Godbert
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Comparative evaluation of three egg production systems: Housing characteristics and management practices.

Authors:  Y Zhao; T A Shepherd; J C Swanson; J A Mench; D M Karcher; H Xin
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Comparison of intestinal permeability, morphology, and ileal microbial communities of commercial hens housed in conventional cages and cage-free housing systems.

Authors:  Maddison L Wiersema; Lucas R Koester; Stephan Schmitz-Esser; Dawn A Koltes
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Laying hen mortality in different indoor housing systems: a meta-analysis of data from commercial farms in 16 countries.

Authors:  Cynthia Schuck-Paim; Elsa Negro-Calduch; Wladimir J Alonso
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Probiotic Bacillus subtilis C-3102 Improves Eggshell Quality after Forced Molting in Aged Laying Hens.

Authors:  Toki Nishiyama; Koichi Nakagawa; Tomokazu Imabayashi; Shun Iwatani; Naoyuki Yamamoto; Nobumichi Tsushima
Journal:  J Poult Sci       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 1.425

7.  Influence of commercial laying hen housing systems on the incidence and identification of Salmonella and Campylobacter.

Authors:  D R Jones; J Guard; R K Gast; R J Buhr; P J Fedorka-Cray; Z Abdo; J R Plumblee; D V Bourassa; N A Cox; L L Rigsby; C I Robison; P Regmi; D M Karcher
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Effect of space allowance and cage size on laying hens housed in furnished cages, Part I: Performance and well-being.

Authors:  T M Widowski; L J Caston; M E Hunniford; L Cooley; S Torrey
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.352

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.