Literature DB >> 21933995

Production performance and proportion of nest eggs in layer hybrids housed in different designs of furnished cages.

H Wall1.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare use of nests, production performance, and egg quality in 4 designs of furnished cages (FC) housing 8 (T8), 10 (T10), 20 (T20), or 40 (T40) layers. The FC housing 8 and 10 hens were commonly used in commercial egg production in Sweden, whereas the cages housing 20 and 40 hens constituted new designs, at present not allowed in Sweden. The FC also differed in design and location of litter facilities. The study comprised 2 full production cycles (20-72 wk of age). Trial 1 included 588 Hy-Line White W98 and 460 Hy-Line Brown layers, and trial 2 used 572 Lohmann Selected Leghorn and 588 Lohmann Brown layers. In accordance with Swedish prohibition, beak treatment was not conducted. In both trials production parameters and mortality were considered normal and levels were unaffected by cage design. Deaths attributable to cannibalistic pecking were rare. Overall, exterior egg quality was superior in T8 compared with T20 and T40, whereas T10 generated intermediate results. Genotype differences were found in production performance, exterior egg quality, and use of nests. In T8 and T10 at least 95% of the eggs were laid in nest whereas in T20 and T40 a considerable percentage of eggs were laid on the litter mat, constituting the litter facility in those cage models. Additional lighting of litter mats (trial 2) had no effect on layers' choice of site for egg laying. Dividing T40 cages in 2 identical cage halves by a rear partition with pop holes had no effect on any of the traits measured. In conclusion, housing larger groups of non-beak-treated hens together in FC is possible, with acceptable levels of production and mortality, provided that cannibalism does not develop. The inferior egg quality in T20 and T40, likely caused by the large proportions of misplaced eggs, needs to be considered in the further development of those cage designs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21933995     DOI: 10.3382/ps.2011-01495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  8 in total

1.  Impact of commercial housing systems and nutrient and energy intake on laying hen performance and egg quality parameters.

Authors:  D M Karcher; D R Jones; Z Abdo; Y Zhao; T A Shepherd; H Xin
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Influence of genetic strain and access to litter on spatial distribution of 4 strains of laying hens in an aviary system.

Authors:  A B A Ali; D L M Campbell; D M Karcher; J M Siegford
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Exterior egg quality as affected by enrichment resources layout in furnished laying-hen cages.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Donghua Chen; Fanyu Meng; Yingying Su; Lisha Wang; Runxiang Zhang; Jianhong Li; Jun Bao
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 2.509

4.  Differences in Pre-Laying Behavior between Floor-Laying and Nest-Laying Pekin Ducks.

Authors:  Lorelle Barrett; Irek Malecki; Dominique Blache
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  The effects of 2 genetic lines on spatial distribution and use and preference of perch and nest area in an aviary system.

Authors:  S Purdum; P Eusebio; K Hanford
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Effects of Different Scratch Mat Designs on Hen Behaviour and Eggs Laid in Enriched Cages.

Authors:  Victoria Sandilands; Laurence Baker; Jo Donbavand; Sarah Brocklehurst
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Comparison of aviary, barn and conventional cage raising of chickens on laying performance and egg quality.

Authors:  M Ahammed; B J Chae; J Lohakare; B Keohavong; M H Lee; S J Lee; D M Kim; J Y Lee; S J Ohh
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.509

8.  Effect of space allowance and cage size on laying hens housed in furnished cages, Part I: Performance and well-being.

Authors:  T M Widowski; L J Caston; M E Hunniford; L Cooley; S Torrey
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.352

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.