Literature DB >> 25630661

Updating and validating a new framework for restoring and analyzing latency-variable ERP components from single trials with residue iteration decomposition (RIDE).

Guang Ouyang1,2,3, Werner Sommer4, Changsong Zhou1,2,3,5,6.   

Abstract

Trial-to-trial latency variability pervades cognitive EEG responses and may mix and smear ERP components but is usually ignored in conventional ERP averaging. Existing attempts to decompose temporally overlapping and latency-variable ERP components show major limitations. Here, we propose a theoretical framework and model of ERPs consisting of temporally overlapping components locked to different external events or varying in latency from trial to trial. Based on this model, a new ERP decomposition and reconstruction method was developed: residue iteration decomposition (RIDE). Here, we describe an update of the method and compare it to other decomposition methods in simulated and real datasets. The updated RIDE method solves the divergence problem inherent to previous latency-based decomposition methods. By implementing the model of ERPs as consisting of time-variable and invariable single-trial component clusters, RIDE obtains latency-corrected ERP waveforms and topographies of the components, and yields dynamic information about single trials.
© 2015 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Keywords:  ERP; ERP decomposition methods; Latency variability; Residue iteration decomposition

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25630661     DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  29 in total

1.  The neurophysiological basis of developmental changes during sequential cognitive flexibility between adolescents and adults.

Authors:  Franziska Giller; Rui Zhang; Veit Roessner; Christian Beste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The oddball effect on P3 disappears when feature relevance or feature-response mappings are unknown.

Authors:  Rolf Verleger; Magdalena Keppeler; Jona Sassenhagen; Kamila Śmigasiewicz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The system-neurophysiological basis for how methylphenidate modulates perceptual-attentional conflicts during auditory processing.

Authors:  Nico Adelhöfer; Krutika Gohil; Susanne Passow; Benjamin Teufert; Veit Roessner; Shu-Chen Li; Christian Beste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Event-related lateralized readiness potential correlates of the emotion-priming Simon effect.

Authors:  Qian Shang; Huijian Fu; Wenwei Qiu; Qingguo Ma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Response selection codes in neurophysiological data predict conjoint effects of controlled and automatic processes during response inhibition.

Authors:  Witold X Chmielewski; Moritz Mückschel; Christian Beste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Distinguishing stimulus and response codes in theta oscillations in prefrontal areas during inhibitory control of automated responses.

Authors:  Moritz Mückschel; Gabriel Dippel; Christian Beste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Decoding Stimulus-Response Representations and Their Stability Using EEG-Based Multivariate Pattern Analysis.

Authors:  Adam Takacs; Moritz Mückschel; Veit Roessner; Christian Beste
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2020-05-07

8.  Neuronal Intra-Individual Variability Masks Response Selection Differences between ADHD Subtypes-A Need to Change Perspectives.

Authors:  Annet Bluschke; Witold X Chmielewski; Moritz Mückschel; Veit Roessner; Christian Beste
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Pushing to the Limits: What Processes during Cognitive Control are Enhanced by Reaction-Time Feedback?

Authors:  Astrid Prochnow; Moritz Mückschel; Christian Beste
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2021-04-07

10.  Do Rare Stimuli Evoke Large P3s by Being Unexpected? A Comparison of Oddball Effects Between Standard-Oddball and Prediction-Oddball Tasks.

Authors:  Rolf Verleger; Kamila Śmigasiewicz
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2016-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.