Literature DB >> 25630646

Evaluation of three commercial assays for rapid detection of genes encoding clinically relevant carbapenemases in cultured bacteria.

Jacqueline Findlay1, Katie L Hopkins1, Daniele Meunier1, Neil Woodford2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the performance of three commercial molecular assays for detecting major families of carbapenemases in pure bacterial isolates.
METHODS: A panel of 450 isolates with previously defined carbapenem resistance mechanisms was tested using the Check-Direct CPE kit, the eazyplex(®) SuperBug complete A kit and the Xpert(®) Carba-R kit. Isolates included 438 Enterobacteriaceae and 12 Pseudomonas spp. comprising 100 isolates each with KPC, NDM, VIM or OXA-48-like enzymes, two isolates producing both an NDM and an OXA-48-like enzyme, 24 IMP producers and 24 isolates without a known carbapenemase gene. Discordant results (commercial versus in-house) were investigated using in-house PCR and amplicons were sequenced to define the carbapenemase allele present.
RESULTS: All three commercial assays detected all isolates with KPC, VIM, NDM and classic OXA-48 carbapenemases (no false-negatives). Isolates producing the OXA-181 variant (n = 18) were not detected by the Xpert(®) Carba-R kit or the eazyplex(®) SuperBug complete A kit, but were subsequently detected with modified versions of these kits. Only the Xpert(®) Carba-R kit could detect IMP carbapenemases, although this was limited to the IMP-1 subgroup. Invalid or false-positive results were either not observed when following the manufacturer's protocols or were eliminated by making simple interpretative adjustments to allow use with bacterial isolates rather than clinical samples.
CONCLUSIONS: Commercial assays offer a reliable means of detecting bacteria with clinically significant carbapenemases. Coverage of some assays required expansion to maximize the sensitivity for OXA-48-like carbapenemases. Choice will ultimately depend on preferred gene coverage, intended throughput, cost and ability to fit into local workflows. © Crown copyright 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enterobacteriaceae; KPC; MBL; NDM; OXA-48

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25630646     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dku571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  40 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Amplidiag CarbaR+VRE Kit for Accurate Detection of Carbapenemase-Producing Bacteria.

Authors:  Saoussen Oueslati; Delphine Girlich; Laurent Dortet; Thierry Naas
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  A Decade of Development of Chromogenic Culture Media for Clinical Microbiology in an Era of Molecular Diagnostics.

Authors:  John D Perry
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Noncarbapenemase OXA-48 Variants (OXA-163 and OXA-405) Falsely Detected as Carbapenemases by the β Carba Test.

Authors:  Laurent Dortet; Thierry Naas
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of Two Phenotypic Algorithms To Detect Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Laurent Dortet; Sandrine Bernabeu; Camille Gonzalez; Thierry Naas
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Rapid and simple identification of carbapenemase genes, bla NDM, bla OXA-48, bla VIM, bla IMP-14 and bla KPC groups, in Gram-negative bacilli by in-house loop-mediated isothermal amplification with hydroxynaphthol blue dye.

Authors:  Arpasiri Srisrattakarn; Aroonlug Lulitanond; Chotechana Wilailuckana; Nicha Charoensri; Lumyai Wonglakorn; Pimjai Saenjamla; Prajuab Chaimanee; Jureerut Daduang; Aroonwadee Chanawong
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Evaluation of loop-mediated isothermal amplification for the rapid identification of bacteria and resistance determinants in positive blood cultures.

Authors:  J Rödel; J A Bohnert; S Stoll; L Wassill; B Edel; M Karrasch; B Löffler; W Pfister
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Universal hospital admission screening for carbapenemase-producing organisms in a low-prevalence setting.

Authors:  Jonathan A Otter; Eleonora Dyakova; Karen N Bisnauthsing; Antonio Querol-Rubiera; Amita Patel; Chioma Ahanonu; Olga Tosas Auguet; Jonathan D Edgeworth; Simon D Goldenberg
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  Rapid Flow Cytometry Test for Identification of Different Carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Ana P Silva; Isabel Faria-Ramos; Elisabete Ricardo; Isabel M Miranda; Maria J Espinar; Sofia Costa-de-Oliveira; Rafael Cantón; Acácio G Rodrigues; Cidália Pina-Vaz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Diversity of resistance mechanisms in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae at a health care system in Northern California, from 2013 to 2016.

Authors:  Fiona Senchyna; Rajiv L Gaur; Johanna Sandlund; Cynthia Truong; Guillaume Tremintin; Dietmar Kültz; Carlos A Gomez; Fiona B Tamburini; Tessa Andermann; Ami Bhatt; Isabella Tickler; Nancy Watz; Indre Budvytiene; Gongyi Shi; Fred C Tenover; Niaz Banaei
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 2.803

Review 10.  NDM Metallo-β-Lactamases and Their Bacterial Producers in Health Care Settings.

Authors:  Wenjing Wu; Yu Feng; Guangmin Tang; Fu Qiao; Alan McNally; Zhiyong Zong
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 26.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.