Literature DB >> 25630322

Staging of colorectal cancer using contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomographic colonography.

Srikala Narayanan, Naveen Kalra1, Anmol Bhatia, Jaidev Wig, Surinder Rana, Deepak Bhasin, Kim Vaiphei, Niranjan Khandelwal.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Preoperative staging is essential for the optimal treatment and surgical planning of colorectal cancers. This study was aimed to evaluate the accuracy of colorectal cancer staging done using contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomographic colonography (CEMDCTC).
METHODS: We recruited 25 patients with 28 proven colorectal cancers. A 16-slice multidetector computed tomography scanner was used to generate two-dimensional multiplanar reformatted sagittal, coronal and oblique coronal images, and three-dimensional virtual colonography (endoluminal) images. Axial and reformatted views were analysed, and TNM staging was done. Patients underwent surgery and conventional colonoscopy, and surgical histopathological correlation was obtained.
RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracies for TNM colorectal cancer staging were 92.3% for T staging, 42.3% for N staging and 96.1% for M staging using CEMDCTC. There was excellent positive correlation for T staging between CEMDCTC and both surgery (κ-value = 0.686) and histopathology (κ-value = 0.838) (p < 0.0001), and moderate positive correlation for N staging between CEMDCTC and surgery (κ-value = 0.424; p < 0.0001). The correlation between CEMDCTC and histopathology for N staging was poor (κ-value = 0.186; p < 0.05); the negative predictive value was 100% for lymph node detection. Moderate positive correlation was seen for M staging between CEMDCTC and both surgery (κ-value = 0.462) and histopathology (κ-value = 0.649). No false negatives were identified in any of the M0 cases.
CONCLUSION: CEMDCTC correlated well with pathologic T and M stages, but poorly with pathologic N stage. It is an extremely accurate tool for T staging, but cannot reliably distinguish between malignant lymph nodes and enlarged reactive lymph nodes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25630322      PMCID: PMC4292006          DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2014182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Singapore Med J        ISSN: 0037-5675            Impact factor:   1.858


  19 in total

Review 1.  Multisection CT: scanning techniques and clinical applications.

Authors:  J Rydberg; K A Buckwalter; K S Caldemeyer; M D Phillips; D J Conces; A M Aisen; S A Persohn; K K Kopecky
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  CT colonography: value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions.

Authors:  S C Chen; D S Lu; J R Hecht; B M Kadell
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal cancers and villous adenomas.

Authors:  Nuzhat A Ahmad; Michael L Kochman; Gregory G Ginsberg
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.722

Review 4.  Adjuvant therapy of colon cancer.

Authors:  J S Macdonald
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients.

Authors:  J G Fletcher; C D Johnson; T J Welch; R L MacCarty; D A Ahlquist; J E Reed; W S Harmsen; L A Wilson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Colorectal neoplasms: role of intravenous contrast-enhanced CT colonography.

Authors:  Jacob Sosna; Martina M Morrin; Jonathan B Kruskal; Richard J Farrell; Imad Nasser; Vassilios Raptopoulos
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Intravenous contrast enhanced computed tomography colonoscopy in children with suspected colonic polyps.

Authors:  Anmol Bhatia; Akshay K Saxena; Naveen Kalra; Kushaljit S Sodhi; Babu R Thapa; Katragadda L N Rao; Niranjan Khandelwal
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Optimizing colonic distention for multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of hyoscine butylbromide and rectal balloon catheter.

Authors:  Stuart A Taylor; Steve Halligan; Vicky Goh; Simon Morley; Paul Bassett; Wendy Atkin; Clive I Bartram
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-08-27       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Rectal cancer: review with emphasis on MR imaging.

Authors:  Regina G H Beets-Tan; Geerard L Beets
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Preoperative T and N staging of colorectal cancer: accuracy of contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT colonography--initial experience.

Authors:  Antonella Filippone; Roberta Ambrosini; Maurizio Fuschi; Tiziana Marinelli; Domenico Genovesi; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  1 in total

1.  Development and validation of a preoperative prediction model for colorectal cancer T-staging based on MDCT images and clinical information.

Authors:  Sha Sa; Jing Li; Xiaodong Li; Yongrui Li; Xiaoming Liu; Defeng Wang; Huimao Zhang; Yu Fu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.