Literature DB >> 25629697

Development of three multiplex PCR assays targeting the 21 most clinically relevant serogroups associated with Shiga toxin-producing E. coli infection in humans.

Sergio Sánchez1, María Teresa Llorente1, María Aurora Echeita1, Silvia Herrera-León1.   

Abstract

Escherichia coli serogroups O5, O15, O26, O45, O55, O76, O91, O103, O104, O111, O113, O118, O121, O123, O128, O145, O146, O157, O165, O172, and O177 are the O-antigen forms of the most clinically relevant Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) serotypes. In this study, three multiplex PCR assays able to specifically detect these 21 serogroups were developed and validated. For this purpose, the O-antigen gene clusters of E. coli O5 and O76 were fully sequenced, their associated genes were identified on the basis of homology, and serogroup-specific primers were designed. After preliminary evaluation, these two primer pairs were proven to be highly specific and suitable for the development of PCR assays for O5 and O76 serogroup identification. Specific primers were also designed for serogroups O15, O45, O55, O91, O104, O113, O118, O123, O128, O146, O157, O165, O172, and O177 based on previously published sequences, and previously published specific primers for serogroups O26, O103, O111, O121, and O145 were also included. These 21 primer pairs were shown to be specific for their target serogroup when tested against E. coli type strains representing 169 known O-antigen forms of E. coli and Shigella and therefore suitable for being used in PCR assays for serogroup identification. In order to validate the three multiplex PCR assays, 22 E. coli strains belonging to the 21 covered serogroups and 18 E. coli strains belonging to other serogroups were screened in a double-blind test and their sensitivity was determined as 1 ng chromosomal DNA. The PCR assays developed in this study could be a faster, simpler, and less expensive strategy for serotyping of the most clinically relevant STEC strains in both clinical microbiology and public health laboratories, and so their development could benefit for clinical diagnosis, epidemiological investigations, surveillance, and control of STEC infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25629697      PMCID: PMC4309606          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Shiga toxin (Stx)-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) are important food-borne zoonotic pathogens responsible for a broad spectrum of clinical symptoms in humans, ranging from mild diarrhea to hemorrhagic colitis (HC) and the life-threatening hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) [1]. Although serotype O157:H7 has been implicated in most outbreaks and in most cases of HUS, there is growing concern about the risk to human health associated with non-O157 STEC serotypes [2,3], which may be as well responsible for important outbreaks, such as the renowned 2011 STEC O104:H4 German outbreak [4]. E. coli clones including both pathogenic and commensal ones are currently identified by the combination of their O (lipopolysaccharide) and H (flagellum protein) antigens [1]. To date, more than 200 different STEC O:H serotypes have been associated with human disease [5]. However, the majority of clinical STEC infections, particularly those associated with outbreaks and serious patient outcomes, are attributable to strains belonging to a subset of STEC serotypes called enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC). This term was originally coined to denote strains that cause HC and HUS, produce Stx and attaching and effacing (A/E) lesions, and possess the 60-MDa virulence plasmid [6]. Concretely, STEC strains producing Stx and A/E lesions and possessing the 60-MDa plasmid are denoted as “typical EHEC”, which includes serotypes O157:H7, O26:H11, O103:H2, O111:H8, O121:H19, and O145:H28 [1,7]. Disease associated STEC strains that do not produce A/E lesions and/or do not possess the 60-MDa plasmid, less frequently involved in hemorrhagic diseases than typical EHEC but nonetheless a frequent cause of diarrhea, are denoted as “atypical EHEC”, which includes serotypes O91:H21, O113:H21, and O104:H21 [1,7,8], as well as O76:H19, O128:H2, O146:H28, and even O104:H4 [4,9,10]. Furthermore, in the recent years, new EHEC serotypes have emerged as an important cause of food-borne infections in humans, including serotypes O5:H-, O15:H2, O45:H2, O55:H7, O103:H25/H11, O118:H16, O123:H11, O165:H25, O172:H25, or O177:H-, which have been denoted as “emerging EHEC” [7,11-13]. E. coli serotyping is typically performed by agglutination reactions using antisera raised in rabbits against the different O and H standard reference strains [14]. However, traditional serotyping is both laborious and time consuming and it often generates equivocal results due to cross-reaction between different serogroups, and even no results when testing rough strains, which are refractory to typing. The reference technique requires the previous thermal inactivation, at different temperatures, of the capsule in order to expose the O antigens, and also the use of a wide collection of antisera, which is too costly for most laboratories and can only be generated by specialized laboratories with animal facilities. Thus, rapid, less expensive, and more specific molecular methods for identifying different E. coli serotypes are strongly needed. Much of the O-antigen variation in E. coli is a consequence of the extensive genetic diversity within the rfb (O-antigen) gene cluster, which encodes many of the enzymes involved in O-antigen biosynthesis and assembly [15]. The rfb region maps flanked by the two housekeeping genes galF and gnd on the E. coli chromosome. Indeed, the JUMPstart sequence, which is a 39-bp conserved element located in the intergenic region between galF and the O-antigen gene cluster, and the gnd sequence, which is present downstream the cluster, have been used to successfully amplify the entire O157 O-antigen gene cluster by PCR [16]. The cluster typically includes three different types of genes: (i) genes encoding enzymes involved in the synthesis of the sugars that form the O subunit; (ii) genes encoding transferases, which assemble sugar substituents into the O subunit; and (iii) genes encoding proteins involved in processing and assembly steps to build the O antigen from the O subunit, such as wzx (enconding the O-antigen transporter or flippase) and wzy (enconding the O-antigen polymerase) [17]. Several genes in the O-antigen gene cluster, in particular wzx and wzy, show relatively low similarity among different E. coli serogroups, and therefore primers targeting wzx and wzy are generally used to develop serogroup-specific PCR assays [18-21]. In this study, the O-antigen gene clusters of E. coli O5 and O76 reference strains were fully sequenced, their associated genes were identified on the basis of homology, and specific primers targeting wzx were designed for each serogroup. Specific primers targeting wzx or wzy were also designed for serogroups O15, O45, O55, O91, O104, O113, O118, O123, O128, O146, O157, O165, O172, and O177 based on previously published sequences from each serogroup. Previously published specific primers targeting wzx of serogroups O26, O103, O111, O121, and O145 were added to the designed primers to further develop three serogroup-specific multiplex PCR assays able to detect these 21 serogroups. These PCR assays were shown to be highly specific and sensitive, and suitable for the detection of the most clinically relevant STEC serogroups.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains

Reference strains for E. coli O5 and E. coli O76 from Statens Serum Institute (SSI, Copenhagen, Denmark) were used for nucleotide sequence analysis of their O-antigen gene clusters. A collection of 10 E. coli O5 and 15 E. coli O76 strains isolated from feces of humans and animals and from food at different time periods in Spain [22-25] was used for the preliminary evaluation of the O5 and O76 serogroup-specific PCR primers designed (S1 Table). A collection of E. coli type strains representing 169 known O-antigen forms of E. coli and Shigella was used for testing of primer specificity and validation of the serogroup-specific multiplex PCR assays developed (S2 Table).

Amplification, sequencing, and sequence analysis of the E. coli O5 and O76 O-antigen gene clusters

Chromosomal DNA from E. coli O5 and E. coli O76 reference strains was prepared with a QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). Published oligonucleotides 482 (5′-CAC TGC CAT ACC GAC GAC GCC GAT CTG TTG CTT GG-3′) and 412 (5′-ATT GGT AGC TGT AAG CCA AGG GCG GTA GCG T-3′) complementary to the JUMPstart sequence and to the proximal end of gnd [11], respectively, were used to amplify their entire O-antigen gene clusters in a long PCR assay carried out with the Expand Long Template PCR System (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) in an ABI 2720 thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) as follows: denaturation at 94°C for 10 s, annealing at 64°C for 30 s, and extension at 68°C for 15 min, repeated ten times. For the next 20 cycles, the extension step was increased by 20 s each time. One initial denaturing step (94°C for 2 min) and one final elongation step (72°C for 7 min) were added. Sequencing of long PCR products was achieved by a primer-walking approach in an ABI 3730xl DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). DNA sequence assembly and analysis, and primers design were performed with the Lasergene software 7.0 (DNAstar, Madison, WI, USA). Within the resulting sequences, putative coding regions were identified by using ORF Finder (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gorf/). BLAST and PSI-BLAST were used for searching databases, including GenBank, COG, and Pfam (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/).

Evaluation of the E. coli O5 and O76 serogroup-specific PCR primers

Serogroup-specific primer pairs were designed based on the wzx sequences determined before from E. coli O5 and E. coli O76 reference strains (Table 1). In order to preliminarily evaluate the E. coli O5 and O76 serogroup-specific PCR primers designed, chromosomal DNA from 50 E. coli strains including 10 E. coli O5, 15 E. coli O76 (S1 Table), and 25 E. coli strains belonging to other serogroups were screened in a double-blind test. For DNA extraction, a 1-μl loop of bacterial growth was suspended in 0.5 ml of sterile distilled water, boiled for 5 min, and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant was used directly as template DNA in the PCR assays, without previous dilution. Conventional PCR amplifying a single target gene was performed using DreamTaq DNA Polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions, in an ABI 2720 thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems) as follows: denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 58°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 1 min, repeated 25 times. Each reaction contained 400–800 nM of each primer (Table 1) and 5 μl of template DNA in a final volume of 25 μl. Fragments were separated in 2% agarose (MS8 type, Pronadisa, Madrid, Spain) gels by unidirectional electrophoresis using TAE 1x buffer and visualized by staining with ethidium bromide. Fragment size was determined by comparison with 100 bp DNA ladders (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Table 1

Primers and concentrations used in the serogroup-specific multiplex PCR assays.

MultiplexO typeGene a PrimernMOligonucleotide sequence (5′-3′)PCR product (bp)Reference
1O5Wzxwzx5_F800CTTATCCGATTAATGGCTTC132This study
wzx5_R800TAGTCGATTTGCTTTTATGGThis study
1O91Wzywzy91_F9600TTTTCTGGAATGCTTGATGA188This study
wzy91_R5600ATAATTTTACGCCGTGTTTGThis study
1O26Wzx5′O26400ACTCTTGCTTCGCCTGTT268[18]
3′O26400CAGCGATACTTTGAACCTTAT[18]
1O103wzx5′O103_F400TATCCTTCATAGCCTGTTGTT327[18]
wzx103_R1400TTATAATAGTAATAAGCCAGACACCThis study
1O145wzx5′O145.6400TTGAGCACTTATCACAAGAGATT418[18]
3′O145.B400GATTGAATAGCTGAAGTCATACTAAC[18]
1O121wzx5′O121200GTAGCGAAAGGTTAGACTGG651[18]
3′O121200ATGGGAAAGCTGATACTGC[18]
1O111wzx5′O111.3400GTTGCGAGGAATAATTCTTCA829[18]
3′O111.2400CCATAGATATTGCATAAAGGC[18]
2O55wzxwzx55_F200ATCGCAATTGCAATAAACTC144This study
wzx55_R1200CCCAACTCTAGTAGATAAAAGCCThis study
2O128wzxwzx128_F2200TTTCGATCGTCTTGTTCAGG193This study
wzx128_R1200CAATGGGCAATTAACACAGAGThis study
2O113wzywzy113_F1400TAACGGGATTAGAAGTGGAT294This study
wzy113_R1400ATATAAGGCAGAAATGAGAGGThis study
2O146wzywzy146_F2800ATCAGTTCATGGGTTGTATTC390This study
wzy146_R1800AGGAACATGGATGAAAGAAGThis study
2O76wzxwzx76_F4400CATATGCAGATTGAAGGTAG550This study
wzx76_R5400GAAAGCCATAAAGTGCCThis study
2O45wzxwzx45_F200GACTTTCGTTGCGTTGTG608This study
wzx45_R1200CTGCAAGTGTAGCGAAAACThis study
2O177wzxwzx177_F2400TCGGTGTTTGAAGGGGAAG767This study
wzx177_R2400GTCCATGCATATGCCGTTCThis study
3O157wzxwzx157_F3600CTCAATTTATAAAAAAGACGCTC111This study
wzx157_R1600TCCAAATATTAACGACTTCACTACThis study
3O15wzxwzx15_F1200GCGTTGCCTACTTACTTATTATC225This study
wzx15_R2200ATGCAAGTCCAGCCAAACThis study
3O104 b wzxwzx104_F400CGGTGTATTAAGAAGTGTTGTC272This study
wzx104_F400ATACTCCCCATAGAAACGCThis study
3O118 c wzxwzx118_F200TGGAGAACAGATAGCAAGAGG409This study
wzx118_R200TATCCGACAAACACGAACCThis study
3O123wzxwzx123_F200GAAAGAACAGAATCAGACTATGC510This study
wzx123_R200TGTGCTAGCGCTAAAGGACThis study
3O165wzxwzx165_F200AACTGTTTATCCGAAGTGGTAG651This study
wzx165_R200CACGCTTTAACGCATACAGThis study
3O172wzxwzx172_F200ATTGGGTAGCCTCAGTAAAG823This study
wzx172_R200CAGTCCAAACAGTGACAGTATCThis study

aGenBank accession numbers for each of the gene targets: O5wzx (KM881565); O91wzy (AY035396); O103wzx (AP010958); O55wzx (NC_013941); O128wzx (AY217096); O113wzx (AF172324); O146wzx (DQ465249); O76wzx (KM881564); O45wzx (AY771223); O177wzx (DQ008593); O157wzx (AE005174); O15wzx (AY647261); O104wzx (AF361371); O118wzx (DQ990684); O123wzx (DQ676933); O165wzx (GU068045); O172wzx (AY545992).

bCross reaction with wzx from E. coli O9.

cCross reaction with wzx from E. coli O151.

aGenBank accession numbers for each of the gene targets: O5wzx (KM881565); O91wzy (AY035396); O103wzx (AP010958); O55wzx (NC_013941); O128wzx (AY217096); O113wzx (AF172324); O146wzx (DQ465249); O76wzx (KM881564); O45wzx (AY771223); O177wzx (DQ008593); O157wzx (AE005174); O15wzx (AY647261); O104wzx (AF361371); O118wzx (DQ990684); O123wzx (DQ676933); O165wzx (GU068045); O172wzx (AY545992). bCross reaction with wzx from E. coli O9. cCross reaction with wzx from E. coli O151.

Specificity of the serogroup-specific PCR primers

Apart from the primers specific for wzx genes of E. coli O5 and O76 described before, specific primers targeting wzx or wzy were also designed for serogroups O15, O45, O55, O91, O104, O113, O118, O123, O128, O146, O157, O165, O172, and O177 based on previously published sequences from each serogroup (Table 1), and previously published specific primers targeting wzx of serogroups O26, O103, O111, O121, and O145 [18] (Table 1) were also considered to further develop multiplex PCR assays. The specificity of the 21 serogroup-specific PCR primer pairs was evaluated by testing them against 169 E. coli type strains representing a broad range of O antigens of E. coli and Shigella. For this purpose, chromosomal DNA was prepared as described before from each of the 169 type strains and used to make DNA pools. A total of 18 pools were made, each containing DNA from 4 to 10 strains (S2 Table), and the 21 serogroup-specific PCR primer pairs were used to screen the DNA pools. Conventional PCR was performed as described before, with each reaction containing 200–800 nM of each primer (Table 1).

Validation and sensitivity of the serogroup-specific multiplex PCR assays

The 21 serogroup-specific primer pairs were combined in three multiplex 5′-nuclease PCR assays (multiplex 1 to 3) (Table 1). In order to validate the three multiplex PCR assays, 22 E. coli strains belonging to the 21 covered serogroups and 18 E. coli strains belonging to other serogroups selected from the E. coli type strains collection were screened in a double-blind test. For this purpose, chromosomal DNA from these 40 E. coli strains was prepared as described before and screened with the three multiplex PCR assays. PCR was performed as described before but in a multiplex way, with each multiplex reaction containing 7 primer pairs in total and 200–800 nM of each primer (Table 1). Additionally, the three multiplex PCR assays were used to test 10-fold serially diluted chromosomal DNA prepared from E. coli strains belonging to the 21 covered serogroups selected from the E. coli type strains collection.

Nucleotide Sequence Accession Number

The DNA sequences of the E. coli O5 and O76 O-antigen gene clusters have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers KM881565 and KM881564, respectively.

Results and Discussion

Nucleotide sequence analysis of the E. coli O5 and O76 O-antigen gene clusters

A sequence of 9,915 bases between the JUMPstart sequence and gnd was obtained from E. coli O5, and eleven open reading frames (ORFs) were found (Fig. 1). All the ORFs were assigned functions and shown to be related to O-antigen biosynthesis on the basis of their similarity to related genes in nucleotide sequence databases (Table 2). A sequence of 7,134 bases was obtained from E. coli O76, and nine ORFs were found (Fig. 1). Likewise, all the ORFs were assigned functions and shown to be related to O-antigen biosynthesis on the basis of their similarity to related genes in nucleotide sequence databases (Table 3). As expected for O-antigen gene clusters, the sequences obtained had a significantly lower G+C content than those in the E. coli genome (Tables 2 and 3) [26]. The E. coli O5 O-antigen gene cluster was shown to be highly related to the Salmonella Pomona O28 O-antigen gene cluster (accession number EU805803), with the same organization and 78% DNA identity. E. coli and Salmonella are closely related, and several cases in which the O-antigen structures are identical or highly similar in the two species have been documented [27,28]. The sequence similarity level between Salmonella and E. coli O-antigen gene clusters that express identical O-antigen backbones is close to the lower end of the range for their housekeeping genes (between 76% and 100% DNA identity), indicating that O-antigen gene clusters for each structure originate from a common ancestor [28].
Fig 1

E. coli O5 and O76 O-antigen gene clusters.

All genes are transcribed in a direction from the JUMPstart sequence to gnd.

Table 2

Putative genes in the E. coli O5 O-antigen gene cluster.

GeneLocation in sequenceG+C content (%)Similar protein(s), species (GenBank accession no.) % aa identity a Putative function of protein
rmlB260–115342.4RmlB, Escherichia coli (WP_000699410)100dTDP-glucose 4,6-dehydratase
rmlA1153–201638.4RmlA, Escherichia coli (WP_000676087)100Glucose-1-phosphate thymidylyltransferase
fdtA2020–241536.1FdtA, Escherichia coli (WP_001025599)100dTDP-6-deoxy-3,4-keto-hexulose isomerase
fdtA2412–287935.3FdtA, Escherichia coli (WP_000469854)100dTDP-6-deoxy-3,4-keto-hexulose isomerase
fdtB2876–376036.3FdtB, Escherichia coli (WP_000564888)99Aminotransferase
wzx3985–524131.9Wzx, Escherichia coli (WP_001048967)100O-antigen flippase
wzy5242–655831.7Wzy, Escherichia coli (WP_000397255)100O-antigen polymerase
wbuM6542–742031.4WbuM, Escherichia coli (WP_001200008)100Glycosyltransferase
ORF97420–808830.8Putative protein, Escherichia coli (WP_000472515)100Haloacid dehalogenase-like hydrolase
wbuO8628–887930.2WbuO, Escherichia coli (WP_001300987)100Serine transferase
amsE8872–969933.9AmsE, Escherichia coli (WP_001000076)100Amylovoran biosynthesis protein

aaa, amino acid.

Table 3

Putative genes in the E. coli O76 O-antigen gene cluster.

GeneLocation in sequenceG+C content (%)Similar protein(s), species (GenBank accession no.) % aa identity a Putative function of protein
ORF1176–94029.4Putative protein, Escherichia coli (WP_024187517)100Glycosyltransferase
wzx927–216530.1Wzx, Escherichia coli (WP_001015334)100O-antigen flippase
ORF22162–273135.3Putative protein LbH_MAT_like, Escherichia coli (WP_000759956)100Acetyltransferase
wzy2731–323725.3Wzy, Escherichia coli (WP_000005509)100O-antigen polymerase
wzy3258–396230.6Wzy, Escherichia coli (WP_000005509)100O-antigen polymerase
wcaN3922–482131.8WcaN, Escherichia coli (WP_000908761)100Glycosyltransferase
rfaG4847–587232.8RfaG, Escherichia coli (WP_000038788)100Glycosyltransferase
galE5927–673934.9GalE, Escherichia coli (WP_000699474)100UDP-glucose 4-epimerase
galE6684–695033.4GalE, Escherichia coli (WP_000699474)100UDP-glucose 4-epimerase

a aa, amino acid.

E. coli O5 and O76 O-antigen gene clusters.

All genes are transcribed in a direction from the JUMPstart sequence to gnd. aaa, amino acid. a aa, amino acid. Primer pairs specific for wzx genes of E. coli O5 and O76 were designed (Table 1) and evaluated in a double-blind test with 50 E. coli strains including 10 E. coli O5, 15 E. coli O76 (S1 Table), and 25 E. coli strains belonging to other serogroups. All the E. coli O5 and O76 strains gave the expected PCR products corresponding to primer pairs used (Table 1), and no PCR products were obtained from strains belonging to other serogroups. Thus, the primers were proven to be highly specific and suitable for the development of PCR assays for O5 and O76 serogroup identification.

Identification of serogroup-specific genes by PCR

Primer pairs specific for wzx or wzy genes of E. coli O5, O15, O26, O45, O55, O76, O91, O103, O104, O111, O113, O118, O121, O123, O128, O145, O146, O157, O165, O172, and O177 (Table 1) were used to screen the 18 DNA pools containing representatives of 169 known O-antigen forms of E. coli and Shigella (S2 Table) in order to test their specificity. The pools containing strains of any of the 21 covered serogroups gave PCR products of the expected size (Table 1), and no PCR products were obtained from the remaining pools, with the only exceptions of pools 1 and 15. Pool 1 gave a positive PCR result when tested with the primer pair specific for wzx gene of E. coli O104 (272 bp). Such a result was not surprising, since pool 1 contained an E. coli O9 strain and it is well known that the gene cluster encoding for serogroup O104 has the same genes in the same order as the K9 gene cluster [29], and the K9 antigen is generally present in E. coli strains belonging to serogroups O8, O9, and O9a [30], which was exactly the case of the E. coli O9 strain included in pool 1. Likewise, pool 15 gave a positive result when tested with the primer pair specific for wzx gene of E. coli O118 (409 bp). This result was also expected, since pool 15 contained an E. coli O151 strain and the O-antigen gene clusters of both E. coli O118 and E. coli O151 have been shown to be organized in the same manner and to share high level identity (> 99% DNA identity) [28]. Indeed, the sequences of wzx genes of E. coli O118 and E. coli O151 are identical [28]. Thus, apart from these limitations, the 21 primer pairs were proven to be specific for their target serogroup when tested against E. coli type strains representing 169 different serogroups and therefore suitable for being used in PCR assays for serogroup identification.

Development of serogroup-specific multiplex PCR assays

In order to develop a less laborious PCR method, the 21 serogroup-specific primer pairs were combined in three multiplex 5′-nuclease PCR assays (multiplex 1 to 3) (Table 1) aiming to detect the most clinically relevant STEC serogroups. For this purpose, the primer pair efficiency for the 21 serogroups was determined on the basis of the amplicons of expected sizes by testing different primer concentrations. The primer concentration resulting in high-signal products was used as described in the Methods section. At the optimized primer concentration ratio, the DNA of 22 strains belonging to the 21 covered serogroups produced the expected PCR products (Fig. 2) in the double-blind test for validation of the three multiplex PCR assays. DNA from 17 strains belonging to other serogroups did not produce any other PCR products and one E. coli O9 strain gave a positive PCR result (272 bp) when tested with multiplex 3, due to the presence of the primer pair specific for wzx gene of E. coli O104 on this multiplex PCR assay, as discussed before. To test the sensitivity of the three multiplex PCR assays, they were carried out to amplify serially diluted chromosomal DNA (100 ng, 10 ng, 1 ng, 100 pg, 10 pg, and 1 pg) prepared from strains belonging to the 21 covered serogroups, and positive PCR results were obtained from as little as 1 ng of DNA for each of the strains.
Fig 2

Agarose gel electrophoresis of the PCR products obtained from E. coli type strains belonging to the 21 covered serogroups by using the three multiplex PCR assays.

(a) Multiplex 1: lanes 1 and 9, 100 bp DNA ladder; lane 2, O5; lane 3, O91; lane 4, O26; lane 5, O103; lane 6, O145; lane 7, O121; lane 8, O111. (b) Multiplex 2: lanes 1 and 9, 100 bp DNA ladder; lane 2, O55; lane 3, O128; lane 4, O113; lane 5, O146; lane 6, O76; lane 7, O45; lane 8, O177. (c) Multiplex 3: lanes 1 and 9, 100 bp DNA ladder; lane 2, O157; lane 3, O15; lane 4, O104; lane 5, O118; lane 6, O123; lane 7, O165; lane 8, O172.

Agarose gel electrophoresis of the PCR products obtained from E. coli type strains belonging to the 21 covered serogroups by using the three multiplex PCR assays.

(a) Multiplex 1: lanes 1 and 9, 100 bp DNA ladder; lane 2, O5; lane 3, O91; lane 4, O26; lane 5, O103; lane 6, O145; lane 7, O121; lane 8, O111. (b) Multiplex 2: lanes 1 and 9, 100 bp DNA ladder; lane 2, O55; lane 3, O128; lane 4, O113; lane 5, O146; lane 6, O76; lane 7, O45; lane 8, O177. (c) Multiplex 3: lanes 1 and 9, 100 bp DNA ladder; lane 2, O157; lane 3, O15; lane 4, O104; lane 5, O118; lane 6, O123; lane 7, O165; lane 8, O172. In conclusion, the three serogroup-specific multiplex PCR assays developed in this study were found to be highly specific and sensitive, and suitable for serogroup identification in E. coli. The combination of these three multiplex PCR assays enables the reliable detection of genes encoding the O antigen in E. coli strains belonging to the most clinically relevant STEC serotypes, including typical, atypical, and emerging EHEC serotypes. This method of molecular serotyping is a faster, simpler, and less expensive technique than traditional serotyping, also enabling the detection of E. coli O antigens even when they cannot be expressed by the bacteria. As a consequence, these PCR assays could be an efficient and convenient strategy for serotyping of the most clinically relevant STEC strains in both clinical microbiology and public health laboratories, especially in those where PCR is already a routine tool, and so their development could benefit clinical diagnosis, epidemiological investigation, surveillance, and control of STEC infections.

E. coli O5 and O76 strains used in this study.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.

E. coli strains in the pools used for testing of primer specificity.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.
  28 in total

1.  Structural and genetic relationships between the O-antigens of Escherichia coli O118 and O151.

Authors:  Bin Liu; Andrei V Perepelov; Dan Guo; Sergei D Shevelev; Sof'ya N Senchenkova; Lu Feng; Alexander S Shashkov; Lei Wang; Yuriy A Knirel
Journal:  FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol       Date:  2010-10-06

2.  Micro-array for the identification of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) seropathotypes associated with Hemorrhagic Colitis and Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome in humans.

Authors:  Marie Bugarel; Lothar Beutin; Annett Martin; Alexander Gill; Patrick Fach
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 5.277

3.  Characterisation of the Escherichia coli strain associated with an outbreak of haemolytic uraemic syndrome in Germany, 2011: a microbiological study.

Authors:  Martina Bielaszewska; Alexander Mellmann; Wenlan Zhang; Robin Köck; Angelika Fruth; Andreas Bauwens; Georg Peters; Helge Karch
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 25.071

4.  Development of a serogroup-specific multiplex PCR assay to detect a set of Escherichia coli serogroups based on the identification of their O-antigen gene clusters.

Authors:  Quan Wang; Xiaojuan Ruan; Dongmei Wei; Zhidong Hu; Lixia Wu; Ting Yu; Lu Feng; Lei Wang
Journal:  Mol Cell Probes       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.365

5.  The Escherichia coli O111 and Salmonella enterica O35 gene clusters: gene clusters encoding the same colitose-containing O antigen are highly conserved.

Authors:  L Wang; P R Reeves
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Sequencing and analysis of the Escherichia coli serogroup O117, O126, and O146 O-antigen gene clusters and development of PCR assays targeting serogroup O117-, O126-, and O146-specific DNA sequences.

Authors:  Yanhong Liu; Chitrita DebRoy; Pina Fratamico
Journal:  Mol Cell Probes       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 2.365

7.  Neonatal hemolytic uremic syndrome after mother-to-child transmission of a low-pathogenic stx2b harboring shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Andrea Stritt; Sibylle Tschumi; Lisa Kottanattu; Barbara S Bucher; Markus Steinmann; Niklaus von Steiger; Roger Stephan; Herbert Hächler; Giacomo D Simonetti
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Cluster investigation of mixed O76:H19 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli and atypical enteropathogenic E. coli infection in a Spanish household.

Authors:  S Sánchez; M García Cenoz; C Martín; X Beristain; M T Llorente; S Herrera-León
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 4.434

9.  Analysis of collection of hemolytic uremic syndrome-associated enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Alexander Mellmann; Martina Bielaszewska; Robin Köck; Alexander W Friedrich; Angelika Fruth; Barbara Middendorf; Dag Harmsen; M Alexander Schmidt; Helge Karch
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Outbreak of haemolytic uraemic syndrome in Norway caused by stx2-positive Escherichia coli O103:H25 traced to cured mutton sausages.

Authors:  Barbara Schimmer; Karin Nygard; Hanne-Merete Eriksen; Jørgen Lassen; Bjørn-Arne Lindstedt; Lin T Brandal; Georg Kapperud; Preben Aavitsland
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 3.090

View more
  11 in total

1.  Designing of immunodiagnostic assay using polyclonal antibodies for detection of Shiga toxin producing pathogenic E. coli (STEC) strains.

Authors:  Biniam Moges; Degisew Yinur; Aliyi Hassen; Tesfaye Sisay Tessema
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 4.253

2.  Recurrent seasonal outbreak of an emerging serotype of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC O55:H7 Stx2a) in the south west of England, July 2014 to September 2015.

Authors:  Noëleen McFarland; Nick Bundle; Claire Jenkins; Gauri Godbole; Amy Mikhail; Tim Dallman; Catherine O'Connor; Noel McCarthy; Emer O'Connell; Juli Treacy; Girija Dabke; James Mapstone; Yvette Landy; Janet Moore; Rachel Partridge; Frieda Jorgensen; Caroline Willis; Piers Mook; Chas Rawlings; Richard Acornley; Charlotte Featherstone; Sharleen Gayle; Joanne Edge; Eleanor McNamara; Jeremy Hawker; Sooria Balasegaram
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2017-09-07

3.  Zoonotic approach to Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli: integrated analysis of virulence and antimicrobial resistance in ruminants and humans.

Authors:  B Oporto; M Ocejo; M Alkorta; J M Marimón; M Montes; A Hurtado
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.451

4.  Identification, Shiga toxin subtypes and prevalence of minor serogroups of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in feedlot cattle feces.

Authors:  Kaylen M Capps; Justin B Ludwig; Pragathi B Shridhar; Xiaorong Shi; Elisabeth Roberts; Chitrita DebRoy; Natalia Cernicchiaro; Randall K Phebus; Jianfa Bai; T G Nagaraja
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Comparison of O-Antigen Gene Clusters of All O-Serogroups of Escherichia coli and Proposal for Adopting a New Nomenclature for O-Typing.

Authors:  Chitrita DebRoy; Pina M Fratamico; Xianghe Yan; GianMarco Baranzoni; Yanhong Liu; David S Needleman; Robert Tebbs; Catherine D O'Connell; Adam Allred; Michelle Swimley; Michael Mwangi; Vivek Kapur; Juan A Raygoza Garay; Elisabeth L Roberts; Robab Katani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Genetic characterization of commensal Escherichia coli isolated from laboratory rodents.

Authors:  Shih Keng Loong; Nur Hidayana Mahfodz; Nurul Asma Anati Che Mat Seri; Haryanti Azura Mohamad Wali; Syahar Amir Abd Gani; Pooi-Fong Wong; Sazaly AbuBakar
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-07-11

7.  Mucus-Activatable Shiga Toxin Genotype stx2d in Escherichia coli O157:H7.

Authors:  Sergio Sánchez; María Teresa Llorente; Laura Herrera-León; Raquel Ramiro; Sandra Nebreda; María Antonia Remacha; Silvia Herrera-León
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 6.883

8.  Identification of Novel Biomarkers for Priority Serotypes of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli and the Development of Multiplex PCR for Their Detection.

Authors:  Matthias Kiel; Pierre Sagory-Zalkind; Céline Miganeh; Christoph Stork; Andreas Leimbach; Camilla Sekse; Alexander Mellmann; François Rechenmann; Ulrich Dobrindt
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Multiplex PCR Assays for the Detection of One Hundred and Thirty Seven Serogroups of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Associated With Cattle.

Authors:  Justin B Ludwig; Xiaorong Shi; Pragathi B Shridhar; Elisabeth L Roberts; Chitrita DebRoy; Randy K Phebus; Jianfa Bai; T G Nagaraja
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 5.293

10.  Genomic Epidemiology of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Isolated from the Livestock-Food-Human Interface in South America.

Authors:  Nicolás Galarce; Fernando Sánchez; Beatriz Escobar; Lisette Lapierre; Javiera Cornejo; Raúl Alegría-Morán; Víctor Neira; Víctor Martínez; Timothy Johnson; Danny Fuentes-Castillo; Elder Sano; Nilton Lincopan
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.