| Literature DB >> 25629032 |
Kwan-Ming Soo1, Tsung-Ying Lin2, Chao-Wen Chen2, Yen-Ko Lin2, Liang-Chi Kuo1, Jaw-Yuan Wang3, Wei-Che Lee2, Hsing-Lin Lin2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Blunt spleen injury is generally taken as major trauma which is potentially lethal. However, the management strategy has progressively changed to noninvasive treatment over the decade. This study aimed to (1) find out the incidence and trend of strategy change; (2) investigate the effect of change on the mortality rate over the study period; and (3) evaluate the risk factors of mortality.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25629032 PMCID: PMC4299358 DOI: 10.1155/2015/124969
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Basic characteristics and outcomes of the blunt spleen injury, stratified according to their respective study years (n = 578).
| Characteristic, outcome | 1997–2000 | 2001–2004 | 2005–2008 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 186 | 199 | 193 | |
| Age (yrs; mean ± SD) | 34.44 ± 19.23 | 37.91 ± 19.28 | 37.51 ± 19.59 | 0.143 |
| Male (%) | 76.8 | 71.9 | 71.0 | 0.396 |
| Injury Severity Score >16 (%) | 10.2 | 22.6 | 23.8 | 0.001 |
| Blood transfusion (unit; mean ± SD) | 6.59 ± 8.53 | 9.44 ± 18.50 | 9.11 ± 17.17 | 0.665 |
| Surgical intervention (%) | 66.1 | 53.3 | 47.2 | 0.001 |
| Intensive care unit length of stay (days; mean ± SD) | 2.31 ± 3.03 | 6.41 ± 21.82 | 4.55 ± 9.17 | 0.001 |
| In-hospital length of stay (days; mean ± SD) | 10.94 ± 8.51 | 11.74 ± 10.24 | 10.91 ± 9.60 | 0.668 |
| Other coexisting injuries ( | 2.95 ± 1.46 | 2.88 ± 1.45 | 3.36 ± 1.34 | 0.002 |
| CT obtained (%) | 40.3 | 46.7 | 52.3 | 0.064 |
| Traffic accident (%) | 25.8 | 28.1 | 43.5 | <0.001 |
| Medical fees | 89007 ± 91498 | 105922 ± 129534 | 123314 ± 202402 | 0.320 |
| Mortality (%) | 5.4 | 1.5 | 8.3 | 0.009 |
Figure 1Incidence of surgical intervention in blunt spleen injury patients. There is a trend towards nonoperative management. 1 (1997–2000): n = 63/186; 2 (2001–2004): n = 93/199; 3 (2005–2008): n = 102/193.
Basic demographic characteristics and outcomes of blunt spleen injury in patients with and without mortality (1997–2008).
| Demographic characteristic, outcome | Total, 578 (100%) | Mortality, 29 (5%) | Survival, 549 (95%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yrs; mean ± SD) | 36.66 ± 19.40 | 36.36 ± 19.11 | 42.38 ± 23.87 | 0.052 |
| Male (%) | 73.2 | 72.4 | 73.2 | 0.928 |
| Injury Severity Score >16 (%) | 19.0 | 20.7 | 18.9 | 0.815 |
| Blood transfusion (unit; mean ± SD) | 8.41 ± 15.51 | 27.17 ± 29.14 | 7.42 ± 13.79 | <0.001 |
| Surgical intervention (%) | 44.6 | 79.3 | 54.1 | 0.008 |
| Intensive care unit length of stay (days; mean ± SD) | 4.47 ± 14.04 | 5.62 ± 10.29 | 4.41 ± 14.22 | 0.309 |
| In-hospital length of stay (days; mean ± SD) | 11.20 ± 9.49 | 4.45 ± 9.73 | 11.56 ± 9.34 | <0.001 |
| Other coexisting injuries (n; mean ± SD) | 3.06 ± 1.43 | 3.72 ± 1.28 | 3.03 ± 1.43 | 0.011 |
| CT obtained (%) | 46.5 | 31.0 | 47.4 | 0.086 |
| Traffic accident (%) | 32.5 | 31.0 | 32.6 | 0.860 |
Figure 2Incidence of mortality in blunt spleen injury patients.
Independent risk factors for the mortality after blunt spleen injury, derived from a multivariate analysis using an entered logistic regression model with forward variable selection.
| Variable entered | Regression coefficient β | Odds ratio (eβ; 95% confidence interval) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| CT obtained | −0.93 | 0.40 (0.16–0.96) | 0.026 |
| Blood transfusion | 0.04 | 1.04 (1.02–1.06) | <0.001 |
| Other coexisting injuries | 0.32 | 1.38 (1.04–1.90) | 0.043 |
| Trauma years | |||
| 1997–2000 | |||
| 2001–2004 | −1.70 | 0.18 (0.04–0.88) | 0.035 |
| 2005–2008 | 0.46 | 1.58 (0.64–3.93) | 0.323 |
| Constant | −6.52 |