| Literature DB >> 25629031 |
Md Mahadi Hasan1, Nizam Uddin1, Md Rakib Hasan2, A F M Mahmudul Islam2, Md Monir Hossain1, Akib Bin Rahman2, Md Sazzad Hossain2, Ishtiaque Ahmed Chowdhury2, Md Sohel Rana1.
Abstract
In folk medicine Mallotus repandus (Willd.) Muell. Arg. is used to treat muscle pain, itching, fever, rheumatic arthritis, snake bite, hepatitis, and liver cirrhosis. This study aimed to evaluate the antinociceptive as well as the anti-inflammatory activities of the methanol extract of leaf. The leaves were extracted with methanol following hot extraction and tested for the presence of phytochemical constituents. Analgesic and anti-inflammatory activities were evaluated using acetic acid induced writhing test, xylene induced ear edema, cotton pellet induced granuloma, and tail immersion methods at doses of 500, 1000, and 2000 mg/kg body weight. The presence of flavonoids, saponins, and tannins was identified in the extract. The extract exhibited considerable antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory activities against four classical models of pain. In acetic acid induced writhing, xylene induced ear edema, and cotton pellet granuloma models, the extract revealed dose dependent activity. Additionally, it increased latency time in tail immersion model. It can be concluded that M. repandus possesses significant antinociceptive potential. These findings suggest that this plant can be used as a potential source of new antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory candidates. The activity of methanol extract is most likely mediated through central and peripheral inhibitory mechanisms. This study justified the traditional use of leaf part of this plant.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25629031 PMCID: PMC4297635 DOI: 10.1155/2014/539807
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Phytochemical constituents identified in methanol extract of M. repandus leaf (MLM).
| Phytochemical | Name of the tests | Observed changes | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alkaloids | Mayer's test | Creamy white precipitate | − |
| Hager's test | Yellow crystalline precipitate | + | |
| Wagner's test | Brown or deep brown precipitate | − | |
| Dragendorff's test | Orange or orange-red precipitate | − | |
| Tannic acid test | Buff color precipitate | − | |
| Carbohydrates | Molisch's test | A red or reddish violet ring is formed at the junction of two layers and on shaking a dark purple solution is formed | + |
| Barfoed's test (general test for monosaccharides) | Red precipitate | − | |
| Fehling's test | A red or brick-red precipitate | − | |
| Benedict's test | + | ||
| Test for combined reducing sugar | A brick-red precipitate | − | |
| Glycosides | General test | Yellow color | − |
| Bromine water test | yellow precipitate | + | |
| Test for glucoside | Production of brick-red precipitation (carried out with the hydrolyzed extract) | − | |
| Flavonoids | Alkaline reagent test | Red color | +/− |
| Shinoda test (magnesium hydrochloride reduction test) | Green to blue color | + | |
| Zinc hydrochloride reduction test | Red color after few minutes | − | |
| Saponins | Frothing test | Formation of stable foam | + |
| Steroids | Libermann-Burchard's test | Greenish color | − |
| Tannins | Lead acetate test | A yellow or red precipitate | + |
| Ferric chloride test | Blue green color | − | |
| Alkaline reagent test | Yellow to red precipitate | + | |
| Terpenoids | Salkowski test | Yellow color appears at the lower layer | − |
(+) = presence; (−) = absence; (+/−) = presence or absence not ascertained.
Effects of various extracts of M. repandus on the latency time in tail immersion test.
| Group | Doses (mg/kg) | Latency time(s) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 h | 1 h | 2 h | 3 h | 4 h | ||
| Control | 1% Tween 80 in water (10 mL/kg) | 4.462 ± 0.196 | 4.278 ± 0.370 | 4.404 ± 0.243 | 3.984 ± 0.334 | 3.936 ± 0.314 |
| Pentazocine | 10 | 4.18 ± 0.256 | 8.4 ± 0.51* | 8.294 ± 0.250* | 8.028 ± 0.96* | 6.834 ± 0.282* |
| MLM | 500 | 4.720 ± 0.343 | 5.540 ± 0.431 | 4.408 ± 0.556 | 5.138 ± 0.186 | 5.704 ± 0.639 |
| 1000 | 4.314 ± 0.136 | 5.990 ± 1.297 | 4.164 ± 0.468 | 5.058 ± 0.403 | 4.742 ± 0.511 | |
| 2000 | 4.778 ± 0.133 | 7.720 ± 1.136 | 6.250 ± 1.625* | 7.540 ± 1.282* | 6.080 ± 0.460* | |
Values are presented in mean ± SEM (n = 5). * P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant when compared against control. Overall time effect is considered extremely significant with F (4, 80) = 5.910 and P < 0.05. Repeated measure ANOVA with Dunnet's multiple comparison was performed to analyze this data set.
Effect of Mallotus repandus leaf methanol extract in acetic acid writhing test.
| Group | Doses (mg/kg) | Number of writhing responses | Inhibition (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 1% Tween 80 in water (10 mL/kg) | 8.8 ± 0.374 | — |
| Diclofenac Na | 100 | 1.4 ± 0.245* | 83.833 |
| MLM | 500 | 6.0 ± 0.949 | 31.611 |
| 1000 | 4.0 ± 1.304* | 54.389 | |
| 2000 | 3.2 ± 0.917* | 63 |
Values are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5). One way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparisons was performed to analyze this dataset. * P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant when compared against control.
Effect of MLM extracts of M. repandus in xylene induced ear edema test.
| Group | Doses (mg/kg) | Ear weight difference (mg) | Inhibition (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 1% Tween 80 in water (10 mL/kg) | 2.860 ± 0.206 | — |
| Diclofenac Na | 100 | 0.320 ± 0.0663* | 88.811 |
| MLM | 500 | 2.840 ± 0.548 | 0.7 |
| 1000 | 0.860 ± 0.420* | 70 | |
| 2000 | 0.600 ± 0.164* | 79.02 |
Values are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5). One way ANOVA followed by Dunnet's multiple comparisons was performed to analyze this dataset. * P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant when compared against control.
Effects of different doses of MLM extract of M. repandus in cotton pellet induced granuloma model.
| Group | Doses (mg/kg) | Granuloma wt. (mg/mg cotton) | Inhibition (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 1% Tween 80 in water (10 mL/kg) | 4.765 ± 0.225 | — |
| Diclofenac Na | 100 | 3.213 ± 0.160* | 32.57 |
| MLM | 500 | 4.451 ± 0.206 | 6.6 |
| 1000 | 3.6474 ± 0.166* | 23.5 | |
| 2000 | 3.605 ± 0.207* | 24.34 |
Values are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5). One way ANOVA followed by Dunnet's multiple comparisons was performed to analyze this dataset. * P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant when compared against control.