Literature DB >> 25628993

Endoscopic cystogastrostomy: minimally invasive approach for pancreatic pseudocyst.

Gull-Zareen Khan Sial1, Abid Quddus Qazi2, Mohammed Aasim Yusuf3.   

Abstract

Pancreatic pseudocysts in children are not uncommon. Non-resolving pseudocysts often require surgical intervention. Endoscopic cystogastrostomy is a minimally invasive procedure which is recommended for this condition. We report a large pancreatic pseudocyst in a 4-year old child, which developed following therapy with PEG-Asparaginase for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. It was managed with minimally invasive procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopic cystogastrostomy; Paediatric patients; Pancreatic pseudocyst

Year:  2015        PMID: 25628993      PMCID: PMC4288835     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  APSP J Case Rep        ISSN: 2218-8185


INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic pseudocyst in children may be seen after pancreatic injury. Most pseudocysts resolve with supportive treatment. However in case of failure of expectant treatment, open cystogastrostomy has been a standard procedure.[1] With the advent of modern endoscopes and experience it is now possible, in appropriate settings, to treat these pseudocysts safely using minimal access techniques.

CASE REPORT

A 4-year old male, being treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, developed acute pancreatitis after receiving PEG-Asparaginase during the induction phase of chemotherapy. There was symptomatic relief with medical management. However, three weeks later, the patient presented with fever, abdominal pain, vomiting and marked epigastric distension. Ultrasound of the abdomen revealed a large pancreatic pseudocyst (PP) measuring 85 x 70mm. It was initially managed conservatively by keeping the patient nil by mouth, on intravenous fluids, antibiotics and prophylactic fluconazole for 5 days. Due to persistent vomiting, he was started on elemental diet via a naso-jejunal tube, which he tolerated well. Re-evaluation ultrasound after 5 weeks of non-operative management revealed marginal increase in the size of the pseudocyst, which now measured 93 x 82mm. Therefore the patient was referred for endoscopic cystogastrostomy. Pre-procedure magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography (MRCP) showed a well-encapsulated but thin-walled cystic lesion in front of the body and tail of pancreas, immediately behind the stomach, with gross forward displacement of the stomach (Fig.1). The pancreatic head and neck appeared unremarkable. Some cystic changes and low signal intensities were seen in the region of the pancreatic tail. The common bile duct (CBD), extra and intra-hepatic biliary channels did not show any abnormality. For endoscopic ultrasound guided drainage, an Olympus linear echoendoscope was introduced via the mouth, under general anaesthesia and advanced to the stomach, from where the cyst was identified (Fig.2). Using a 19G needle (Fig.2), the cyst was punctured and a cystotome was then used to enlarge the track, over a guide-wire. Two 7 Fr 7cm silicon double pigtail stents were then inserted into the cyst. A sample of orange coloured fluid was retained for analysis. Amylase level in this fluid was subsequently reported as 14,254U/L. The patient was kept under follow-up with serial ultrasound scans for complete resolution/recurrence of pseudocyst. Following complete resolution, the stents were removed endoscopically after eight months and the child remained well. Figure 1: MRI showing a large cystic collection of fluid in front of body and tail of pancreas, pushing the stomach anteriorly. Figure 2: Showing endoscopic insertion of needle (arrow) in to the pseudocyst to aspirate the fluid and subsequently insert guide wire.

DISCUSSION

Various treatment options are available for the management of PP, such as open surgery, per-cutaneous drainage, laparoscopic and endoscopic cystogastrostomy. Initially, most patients are given a trial of non-operative management by maintaining good hydration, analgesia, prophylactic antibiotic coverage and parenteral or enteral nutrition in the hope that the PP may undergo spontaneous resolution.[2,3] If its size is more than 5-6 cm and progressively increasing, as happened in our case, then the case for intervention becomes stronger. Open cystogastrostomy (OCG) has been considered the gold standard for drainage of pseudocysts.[4] Percutaneous cystogastrostomy (PCG) is a less preferred technique due to high risk of recurrence and pancreatic fistula formation.[5] Laparoscopic cystogastrostomy (LCG) has been frequently used and has consistently produced good results. However in comparison to endoscopic cystogastrostomy, it is still a more extensive procedure.[6] Three to four ports are used to create cystogastrostomy of Roux-En-Y jejunostomy. Occasionally it may require conversion into an open procedure.[7] This procedure may be reserved for failed endoscopic procedures. Endoscopic cystogastrostomy (ECG) is superior to the aforementioned techniques in being minimally invasive with quick post-procedure recovery and consequently shorter hospital stay. Our patient was discharged home after overnight post-procedure monitoring. The risk of recurrence of symptoms due to stent clogging or migration can be lessened by use of two-pigtail stents.[8] With the aid of endoscopic ultrasonography, the risk of haemorrhage due to trauma to local vessels is further minimized.[9] There is limited data available regarding ECG in children.[10] Although there is a risk of recurrence even with this procedure, using it as the first modality is the best choice due to the minimally invasive nature of the procedure. Endoscopic cyst-gastrostomy was found to be safe and well-tolerated procedure in index case and we recommend that it should be considered in the management of children with pancreatic pseudocysts.

Footnotes

Source of Support: Nil Conflict of Interest: None declared
  10 in total

1.  Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts in a pediatric population.

Authors:  Saad F Jazrawi; Bradley A Barth; Jayaprakash Sreenarasimhaiah
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Cystogastrostomy: a valid option for treating pancreatic pseudocysts of children in developing countries.

Authors:  Simmi K Ratan; Kamal Nain Rattan; Seema Rohilla; Sarita Magu
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 3.  Pancreatic pseudocyst: case report and short literature review.

Authors:  E Gagliano; M A Barbuscia; A Tonante; F Taranto; D Paparo; E Papalia; R Cascio; C Damiano; G Sturniolo
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec

4.  Pancreatic pseudocyst drainage guided by endoscopic ultrasound.

Authors:  Juan J Vila; David Carral; Ignacio Fernández-Urien
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-06-16

Review 5.  Pancreatic pseudocysts.

Authors:  C Apostolou; J E J Krige; P C Bornman
Journal:  S Afr J Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 0.375

6.  Percutaneous cystogastrostomy for treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts.

Authors:  M R Cox; R P Davies; R C Bowyer; J Toouli
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1993-09

7.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided endoscopic transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts.

Authors:  César Vivian Lopes; Christian Pesenti; Erwan Bories; Fabrice Caillol; Marc Giovannini
Journal:  Arq Gastroenterol       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar

8.  Long-term outcome of laparoscopic cystogastrostomy performed using a posterior approach with a stapling device.

Authors:  Takatsugu Oida; Kenji Mimatsu; Atsushi Kawasaki; Hisao Kano; Youichi Kuboi; Osamu Aramaki; Sadao Amano
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 2.588

9.  Equal efficacy of endoscopic and surgical cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage in a randomized trial.

Authors:  Shyam Varadarajulu; Ji Young Bang; Bryce S Sutton; Jessica M Trevino; John D Christein; C Mel Wilcox
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Management of pancreatic pseudocyst in the era of laparoscopic surgery--experience from a tertiary centre.

Authors:  Chinnusamy Palanivelu; Karuppuswamy Senthilkumar; Madathupalayam Velusamy Madhankumar; Pidigu Seshiyar Rajan; Alangar Roshan Shetty; Kalpesh Jani; Muthukumaran Rangarajan; Gobi Shanmugam Maheshkumaar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 4.584

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.