| Literature DB >> 25628826 |
Mohammed Rafiq Khan1, Sellappa Sudha1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Occupational and environmental exposures mostly represent mixtures of genotoxic agents, whereas the specificity of biomarker measurements varies widely. Exploration of correlations among biomarkers contributes to the further progress of molecular cancer epidemiology and to the selection of the optimal biomarkers for the investigation of human exposure to carcinogens. The aim of this study was to assess the potential cytogenetic damage associated with occupational exposure to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) among automobile mechanics by using Micronuclei (MN) and other Nuclear Abnormalities (NA) as a biomarker.Entities:
Keywords: DNA damage; Micronucleus test; Occupational exposure; Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon
Year: 2012 PMID: 25628826 PMCID: PMC4299624
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Cancer Prev ISSN: 2008-2398
General characteristics of groups studied
| Study group | N | Age (years) mean ±SD | Average no of cigarettes/ day | Alcohol intake in last 1 yr (g alcohol drinking/day) mean ±SD | Duration of employment (years) mean ±SD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control (n=100) | Smokers | 31 | 35.60 ± 2.28 | 20 | - | - |
| Non-smokers | 28 | 33.28 ± 1.18 | - | - | - | |
| Smoking with Drinking | 30 | 36.08 ± 3.01 | 18 | 88.91 ± 33.53 | - | |
| Smoking with tobacco chewing | 11 | 32.31 ± 1.23 | 16 | - | - | |
| Workers (n=110) | Smokers | 30 | 32.33 ± 2.20 | 21 | - | 12.65 ± 3.05 |
| Non-smokers | 30 | 31.76 ± 1.73 | - | - | 8.83 ± 1.73 | |
| Smoking with Drinking | 32 | 30.33 ± 2.04 | 17 | 92.12 ± 31.05 | 10.50 ± 0.81 | |
| Smoking with tobacco chewing | 18 | 29.21 ± 2.18 | 18 | - | 9.63 ± 1.98 | |
The frequencies of micronuclei and other nuclear abnormalities in exfoliated buccal epithelial cells of control and PAHs exposed automobile mechanics
| Study group | N | MN (mean ±SD) | BN (mean ±SD) | BE (mean ±SD) | KL (mean ±SD) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control (n=100) | Smokers | 31 | 2.88 ± 1.20 | 4.08 ± 1.28 | 6.77 ± 1.30 | 3.52 ±2.25 |
| Non-smokers | 28 | 1.93 ± 0.88 | 3.01 ± 1.31 | 3.52 ± 2.25 | 2.80 ±1.47 | |
| Smoking with Drinking | 30 | 2.26 ± 1.07 | 3.76 ± 1.36 | 5.91 ± 1.82 | 3.38 ± 2.31 | |
| Smoking with tobacco chewing | 11 | 2.66 ± 1.12 | 3.87 ± 1.23 | 5.01 ± 1.16 | 3.45 ± 2.35 | |
| Workers (n=110) | Smokers | 30 | 7.90 ± 1.91 | 8.95 ± 1.36 | 14.91 ± 5.21 | 8.50 ± 1.19 |
| Non-smokers | 30 | 6.94 ± 1.76 | 7.31 ± 1.12 | 11.17 ± 4.06 | 6.77 ± 1.30 | |
| Smoking with Drinking | 32 | 7.59 ± 2.18 | 8.80 ± 1.20 | 13.94 ± 6.32 | 8.13 ± 1.32 | |
| Smoking with tobacco chewing | 18 | 7.66 ± 2.15 | 8.85 ± 1.51 | 13.57 ± 7.63 | 8.19 ± 1.53 | |
MN=cells with Micronuclei; BN=Binucleated cells; BE= Broken Egg cells; KL= Karyolytic cells
significantly different with their respective controls, p<0.05.