| Literature DB >> 25628748 |
Yongqiang Yin1, Xuhui Ying2, Hairong Luan3, Zhenying Zhao4, Jianshi Lou1, Deli Wang3, Hailin Li3, Hong Wu5.
Abstract
Chinese people commonly make jasmine tea for recreation and health care. Actually, its medicinal value needs more exploration. In this study, vasorelaxant effect of ethanol extract of jasmine flower (EEJ) on isolated rat thoracic aorta rings was investigated and [Ca(2+)] was determined in vascular smooth muscle cells by laser scanning confocal microscope (LSCM). The result of aorta rings showed that EEJ could cause concentration-dependent relaxation of endothelium-intact rings precontracted with phenylephrine or KCl which was attenuated after preincubation of the rings with L-NAME and three different K(+) channel inhibitors; however, indomethacin and glibenclamide did not affect the vasodilatation of EEJ. In addition, EEJ could inhibit contraction induced by PE on endothelium-denuded rings in Ca(2+)-free medium as well as by accumulation of Ca(2+) in Ca(2+)-free medium with high K(+). LSCM also showed that EEJ could lower the elevated level of [Ca(2+)] induced by KCl. These indicate that the vasodilation of EEJ is in part related to causing the release of nitric oxide, activation of K(+) channels, inhibition of influx of excalcium, and release of calcium from sarcoplasmic reticulum. A total of 20 main ingredients, were identified in EEJ by UPLC-DAD/Q-TOF-MS. The vasodilation activity should be attributed to the high content of flavonoid glycosides and iridoid glycosides found in EEJ.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25628748 PMCID: PMC4055455 DOI: 10.1155/2014/707908
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Chromatograms of EEJ analyzed by UPLC-DAD/Q-TOF-MS. (a) UV chromatogram of EEJ (scanned from 190 nm to 400 nm). (b) TIC chromatogram of EEJ in positive ion mode. (c) TIC chromatogram of EEJ in negative ion mode. Peak numbers are consistent with those shown in Table 1.
Identification of the ingredients in EEJ by UPLC-DAD/Q-TOF-MS.
| Number |
| Positive ion | Negative ion | UV ( | Identification | Exact mass |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [M + H]+ (MS/MS) | [M − H]− (MS/MS) | |||||
| 1 | 1.44 | 284.0995 (152) | 282.0846 (150) | 205; 258 | Guanosine | 283.0917 |
| 2 | 2.23 | 166.0829 (149; 120) | 164.0661 (147) | 205; 258 | Phenylalanine | 165.0790 |
| 3 | 3.17 | 357.1244 (193) | 355.1105 (191) | 230; 321 |
| 356.1107 |
| 4 | 3.63 | 205.0961 (188; 132) | 203.0784 (159; 130) | 219; 278 | Tryptophan | 204.0899 |
| 5 | 6.17 | 403.1629 (271) | 401.1412 (269; 161) | 203; 255 | Benzyl 6-O-( | 402.1526 |
| 6 | 7.45 | 757.2231 (611; 465; 303) | 755.2079 (301; 300) | 254; 353 | Quercetin-3-O-(2,6- | 756.2113 |
| 7 | 8.16 | 741.2261 (595; 449; 287) | 739.2090 (575; 285; 284) | 230; 347 | Kaempferol-3-O-(2,6- | 740.2164 |
| 8 | 8.37 | 611.1608 (465; 303) | 609.1449 (301; 300) | 255; 353 | Rutin | 610.1534 |
| 9 | 8.57 | 611.1613 (465; 303) | 609.1456 (301; 300) | 255; 352 | Quercetin-3-O-neohesperidoside | 610.1534 |
| 10 | 8.87 | 591.2371 (429; 411) | 589.2212 (427) | 249; 339 |
| 590.2211 |
| 11 | 9.19 | 595.1647 (449; 287) | 593.1499 (427; 285) | 230; 348 | Kaempferol-3-O- | 594.1585 |
| 12 | 9.52 | 449.1030 (287) | 447.0866 (285) | 230; 348 | Kaempferol-3-O- | 448.1006 |
| 13 | 12.21 | 977.3852 (797; 617; 393) | 975.3782 (813; 589) | 191; 237 | Molihuaside E | 976.3788 |
| 14 | 12.35 | 977.3931 (797; 617; 393) | 975.3814 (813; 589) | 191; 237 | Molihuaside A | 976.3788 |
| 15 | 12.93 | 977.3994 (797; 617; 393) | 975.3796 (813; 589) | 191; 237 | Molihuaside D | 976.3788 |
| 16 | 13.03 | 977.3879 (797; 617; 393) | 975.3778 (813; 589) | 191; 237 | Molihuaside C | 976.3788 |
| 17 | 13.42 | 1363.5467 (1183; 1003; 823; 375) | 1361.5055 (1199; 813) | 191; 237 | Molihuaside B | 1362.5000 |
| 18 | 14.08 | 1363.5112 (1183; 1003; 823; 375) | 1361.5082 (1199; 813) | 191; 237 | Sambacoside E | 1362.5000 |
| 19 | 14.23 | 1363.5226 (1183; 1003; 823; 375) | 1361.5073 (1199; 813) | 191; 237 | Sambacoside A | 1362.5000 |
| 20 | 14.55 | 1363.5189 (1183; 1003; 823; 375) | 1361.5036 (1199; 813) | 191; 237 | Sambacoside F | 1362.5000 |
Figure 2Vasorelaxant effect of EEJ. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 8). (a) Cumulative concentration response for EEJ (0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1, and 2 g/L) on PE (10 μM) or KCl (60 mM) precontracted endothelium-intact thoracic aorta rings. Maximum contraction amplitude induced by PE (10 μM) is considered as 100%. (b) Effects of L-NAME (3 mM) and Indo (10 μM) on EEJ induced relaxation in the endothelium-intact aorta rings precontracted with PE (10 μM). * P < 0.05,** P < 0.01 compared with control group. (c) Effects of 4-AP (5 mM), BaCl2 (1 mM), TEA (1 mM), and GLi (10 μM) on EEJ induced relaxation in the endothelium-intact aorta rings precontracted with PE (10 μM). ** P < 0.01 compared 4-AP treating group with control group;++ P < 0.01 compared TEA treating group with control group;## P < 0.01 compared BaCl2 treating group with control group. (d) Effects of EEJ (1 g/L) on the cumulative concentration response for CaCl2 (0.5 mM–8 mM) in high K+ (60 mM)-Ca2+-free depolarizing solution. ** P < 0.01 compared with control group. (e) Effect of EEJ (1 g/L) on the PE (10 μM) precontracted endothelium-denuded aortic rings in the Ca2+-free K-H solution. ** P < 0.01 compared with the Ca2+-containing group. (f) Influence of EEJ (1 g/L, 2 g/L) on the increase of [Ca2+] in ASMCs induced by KCl (30 mM). Verapamil (VER, 10 μM) was applied as the positive inhibition control group. ** P < 0.01 EEJ (1 g/L) treating group compared with the control group; ## P < 0.01 EEJ (2 g/L) treating group compared with the control group; ++ P < 0.01 verapamil treating group compared with the control group.