| Literature DB >> 25628675 |
Fahimeh Hamedi-Rad1, Tahereh Ghaffari1, Farzad Rezaii2, Ali Ramazani3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), widely used as a prosthodontic base, has many disadvantages, including a high thermal expansion coefficient and low thermal conductivity, a low elasticity coefficient, low impact strength and low resistance to fatigue. This study aimed to make an in vitro comparison of the thermal conductivity, compressive strength, and tensile strength of the acrylic base of complete dentures with those of acrylic reinforced with nanosilver.Entities:
Keywords: Compressive strength; Nanosilver; Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA); Tensile strength; Thermal conductivity
Year: 2014 PMID: 25628675 PMCID: PMC4290768
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Dent (Tehran) ISSN: 1735-2150
Fig 1.Schematic view of the thermal conductivity measurement apparatus.
Fig 2.Standard schematic drawing of the tensile strength test measurement apparatus.
Fig 3.Drilling points of the cylindrical specimens.
Fig 4.Thermal conductivity measurement apparatus with the cylindrical specimen
Fig 5.The compressive strength measurement apparatus with a cylindrical specimen
Fig 6.The universal tensile strength measurement machine with a rectangular specimen
Comparison of thermal conductivity, tensile and compressive strengths of control and test groups
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 0.63 | 0.00 | −12.74 | 10 | 0.00 | ||
| 6 | 0.65 | 0.00 | |||||
|
| |||||||
| 6 | 60.12 | 0.26 | 46.53 | 10 | 0.00 | ||
| 6 | 52.20 | 0.32 | |||||
|
| |||||||
| 6 | 102.16 | 0.53 | −50.64 | 10 | 0.00 | ||
| 6 | 121.19 | 0.75 | |||||