Literature DB >> 25626808

Advanced age is a predictor of 30-day complications after autologous but not implant-based postmastectomy breast reconstruction.

Daniel R Butz1, Brittany Lapin, Katharine Yao, Edward Wang, David H Song, Donald Johnson, Mark Sisco.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Older breast cancer patients undergo postmastectomy breast reconstruction infrequently, in part because of a perception of increased surgical risk. This study sought to investigate the effects of age on perioperative complications after postmastectomy breast reconstruction.
METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Files from 2005 to 2012 were used to identify women with breast cancer who underwent unilateral mastectomy alone or with immediate reconstruction. Thirty-day complication rates were compared between younger (<65 years) and older (≥65 years) women after implant-based reconstruction, autologous reconstruction, or mastectomy alone. Linear and logistic regression models were used to control for differences in comorbidities and age.
RESULTS: A total of 40,769 patients were studied, of whom 15,093 (37 percent) were aged 65 years or older. Breast reconstruction was performed in 39.5 percent of younger and 10.7 percent of older women. The attributable risks of breast reconstruction, manifested by longer hospital stays (p < 0.001), more frequent complications (p < 0.001), and more reoperations (p < 0.001), were similar in older and younger women. There were no differences in the adjusted complication rates between older and younger patients undergoing implant-based reconstruction. However, older women undergoing autologous reconstruction were more likely to suffer venous thromboembolism (OR, 3.67; p = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: The perioperative risks attributable to breast reconstruction are similar in older and younger women. Older patients should be counseled that their age does not confer an increased risk of complications after implant-based breast reconstruction. However, age is an independent risk factor for venous thromboembolism after autologous reconstruction. Special attention should be paid to venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in this group. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25626808     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  11 in total

1.  Surveillance and Prevention of Surgical Site Infections in Breast Oncologic Surgery with Immediate Reconstruction.

Authors:  Margaret A Olsen; Katelin B Nickel; Ida K Fox
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Infect Dis       Date:  2017-05-11

Review 2.  Complications and thromboembolic events associated with tamoxifen therapy in patients with breast cancer undergoing microvascular breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rajiv P Parikh; Elizabeth B Odom; Liyang Yu; Graham A Colditz; Terence M Myckatyn
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Effect of Patient Age on Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction: Results from a Multicenter Prospective Study.

Authors:  Katherine B Santosa; Ji Qi; Hyungjin M Kim; Jennifer B Hamill; Andrea L Pusic; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Tissue Expander Complications Do Not Preclude a Second Successful Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Louis H Poppler; Minh-Bao Mundschenk; Andrew Linkugel; Ema Zubovic; Utku C Dolen; Terence M Myckatyn
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Predictive Factors for Drainage Volume after Expander-based Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Hirotaka Suga; Tomohiro Shiraishi; Yuka Shibasaki; Akihiko Takushima; Kiyonori Harii
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-06-01

6.  Safety of Immediate Posterior Trunk Soft-Tissue Reconstruction in Older Adults.

Authors:  Nicholas A Calotta; Devin Coon; Justin M Sacks
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-05-25

Review 7.  Outcomes in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap and Implant-Based Reconstruction: Does Age Really Matter?

Authors:  Lauren V Kuykendall; Angie Zhang; Bugra Tugertimur; Sara Bijan; Corin Agoris; Ambuj Kumar; Deniz Dayicioglu
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.302

8.  Two-Staged Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Long-Term Outcome Study in a Young Population.

Authors:  Oscar J Manrique; Ali Charafeddine; Amjed Abu-Ghname; Joseph Banuelos; Steven R Jacobson; Jorys Martinez-Jorge; Minh-Doan Nguyen; Christin Harless; Nho V Tran; Basel Sharaf; James W Jakub; Tina J Hieken; Amy C Degnim; Judy C Boughey
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 2.430

9.  Implications of Aging in Plastic Surgery.

Authors:  Danny S Roh; Adriana C Panayi; Shalender Bhasin; Dennis P Orgill; Indranil Sinha
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-01-14

Review 10.  Reducing infection risk in implant-based breast-reconstruction surgery: challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Adrian Sh Ooi; David H Song
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2016-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.