Literature DB >> 25626781

International importance of robust breast device registries.

Rodney D Cooter1, Shane Barker, Sean M Carroll, Gregory R D Evans, Uwe von Fritschen, Helmut Hoflehner, Claude Le Louarn, David B Lumenta, Irene M J Mathijssen, John McNeil, Stephen Mulgrew, Marc A M Mureau, Graeme Perks, Hinne Rakhorst, Charles Randquist, Moris Topaz, Charles Verheyden, John de Waal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast implants are high-risk devices that have been at the epicenter of much debate and controversy. In light of the Poly Implant Prothèse crisis, data registries among 11 national societies around the world are cooperatively calling for the urgent need to establish robust national clinical quality registries based on international best practice within a framework of international collaboration.
METHODS: A survey was conducted on the historic and current status of national breast device registries. Eleven countries participated in the study, illustrating different data collection systems and registries around the world. Data collection was designed to illustrate the capabilities of current national registries, with particular focus on capture rate and outcome reporting mechanisms.
RESULTS: A study of national breast implant registries revealed that less than half of the participating countries had operational registries and that none of these had adequately high data capture to enable reliable outcome analysis. The study revealed that the two most common problems that discouraged participation are the complexity of data sets and the opt-in consent model.
CONCLUSIONS: Recent implant crises have highlighted the need for robust registries. This article argues the importance of securing at least 90 percent data capture, which is achievable through the opt-out consent model. Since adopting this model, the Australian Breast Device Registry has increased data capture from 4 percent to over 97 percent. Simultaneously, it is important to foster international collaboration from the outset to avoid duplication of efforts and enable the development of effective international early warning systems.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25626781     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  9 in total

Review 1.  Decisional pathways in breast augmentation: how to improve outcomes through accurate pre-operative planning.

Authors:  Maurizio B Nava; Nicola Rocco; Gianfranco Tunesi; Giuseppe Catanuto; Alberto Rancati; Julio Dorr
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-04

2.  In Defense of the International Collaboration of Breast Registry Activities (ICOBRA).

Authors:  Rod Cooter; Richard Barnett; Anand Deva; Mark R Magnusson; John McNeil; Graeme Perks; Hinne Rakhorst; Charles Verheyden
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 4.283

3.  Pilot for the Australian Breast Device Registry (ABDR): a national opt-out clinical quality registry for breast device surgery.

Authors:  Ingrid Hopper; Renee L Best; John J McNeil; Catherine M Mulvany; Colin C M Moore; Elisabeth Elder; Marie Pase; Rodney D Cooter; Sue M Evans
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  A decision-making method for breast augmentation based on 25 years of practice.

Authors:  Maurizio Bruno Nava; Giuseppe Catanuto; Nicola Rocco
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2018-03-05

5.  Defining Quality Indicators for Breast Device Surgery: Using Registries for Global Benchmarking.

Authors:  Husna Begum; Swarna Vishwanath; Michelle Merenda; Mark Tacey; Nicola Dean; Elisabeth Elder; Marc Mureau; Ron Bezic; Pamela Carter; Rodney D Cooter; Anand Deva; Arul Earnest; Michael Higgs; Howard Klein; Mark Magnusson; Colin Moore; Hinne Rakhorst; Christobel Saunders; Birgit Stark; Ingrid Hopper
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-08-19

6.  Breast Implant Prevalence in the Dutch Female Population Assessed by Chest Radiographs.

Authors:  Mintsje de Boer; Michele van Middelkoop; Michael Hauptmann; Noortje van der Bijl; Jorn A W Bosmans; Narda Hendriks-Brouwer; Sijmen J Schop; Jan Paul de Boer; Nathalie J Hijmering; Lucy I H Overbeek; Marc B I Lobbes; Caroline A H Klazen; Daphne de Jong; Hinne A Rakhorst; René R W J van der Hulst; Flora E van Leeuwen
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 4.283

7.  The Case Against the National Breast Implant Registry.

Authors:  Eric Swanson
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 1.763

8.  Design and Evaluation of Web-Based Dental Implant Registry (DIR) for Better Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Roya Naemi; Majid Jangi; Hamid Reza Barikani; Leila Shahmoradi
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2022-02-11

9.  Establishing Priorities for the International Confederation of Plastic Surgery Societies.

Authors:  Rodney D Cooter; Louise A Brightman; Howard M Clarke; Norma I Cruz; Greg R D Evans; Kyung S Koh; Robert X Murphy; Graeme A B Perks; Hinne A Rakhorst
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-09-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.