Literature DB >> 28497024

Decisional pathways in breast augmentation: how to improve outcomes through accurate pre-operative planning.

Maurizio B Nava1,2, Nicola Rocco3, Gianfranco Tunesi4, Giuseppe Catanuto5, Alberto Rancati6, Julio Dorr7.   

Abstract

Breast augmentation is the most commonly performed surgical procedure in aesthetic plastic surgery. Accurate pre-operative planning is crucial to obtain the best outcomes. We present our planning method deriving from a more than 30-year experience in aesthetic breast surgery, matching together patients tissues' characteristics and patients' wishes. We schematized our planning method in an easy-to-use flow diagram to help the decisional process in breast augmentation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast augmentation; breast implants; pre-operative planning

Year:  2017        PMID： 28497024      PMCID： PMC5409897          DOI： 10.21037/gs.2017.03.01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN： 2227-684X


  22 in total

1.  Natrelle style 410 form-stable silicone breast implants: core study results at 6 years.

Authors:  G Patrick Maxwell; Bruce W Van Natta; Diane K Murphy; Araceli Slicton; Bradley P Bengtson
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 4.283

2.  Style 410 highly cohesive silicone breast implant core study results at 3 years.

Authors:  Bradley P Bengtson; Bruce W Van Natta; Diane K Murphy; Araceli Slicton; G Patrick Maxwell
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 3.  Breast augmentation: Part III--preoperative considerations and planning.

Authors:  M G Berry; V Cucchiara; D M Davies
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Techniques used by United Kingdom consultant plastic surgeons to select implant size for primary breast augmentation.

Authors:  W J M Holmes; M J Timmons; S Kauser
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Discussion: International importance of robust breast device registries.

Authors:  Maurice Y Nahabedian
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Breast ptosis. Definition and treatment.

Authors:  P Regnault
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 2.017

7.  Dual plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types.

Authors:  John B Tebbetts
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  The process of breast augmentation: four sequential steps for optimizing outcomes for patients.

Authors:  William P Adams
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 9.  The Process of Breast Augmentation with Special Focus on Patient Education, Patient Selection and Implant Selection.

Authors:  William P Adams; Kevin H Small
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.017

Review 10.  Clinical trial outcomes of high- and extra high-profile breast implants.

Authors:  Joan A Largent; Neal R Reisman; Hilton M Kaplan; Michael G Oefelein; Mark L Jewell
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 4.283
View more
  2 in total

1.  Breast Implant Selection: Consensus Recommendations Using a Modified Delphi Method.

Authors:  Mark R Magnusson; Tony Connell; Michael Miroshnik; Craig Layt; Mark Ashton; Anand K Deva; Hamish Farrow; Janek Januszkiewicz
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-05-01

2.  Examining the Post-operative Well-Being of Women Who Underwent Mammoplasty: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Jessica Ranieri; Fabiana Fiasca; Federica Guerra; Enrico Perilli; Antonella Mattei; Dina Di Giacomo
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.157
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.