Literature DB >> 25626676

A Bayesian dose-finding design for phase I/II clinical trials with nonignorable dropouts.

Beibei Guo1, Ying Yuan.   

Abstract

Phase I/II trials utilize both toxicity and efficacy data to achieve efficient dose finding. However, due to the requirement of assessing efficacy outcome, which often takes a long period of time to be evaluated, the duration of phase I/II trials is often longer than that of the conventional dose-finding trials. As a result, phase I/II trials are susceptible to the missing data problem caused by patient dropout, and the missing efficacy outcomes are often nonignorable in the sense that patients who do not experience treatment efficacy are more likely to drop out of the trial. We propose a Bayesian phase I/II trial design to accommodate nonignorable dropouts. We treat toxicity as a binary outcome and efficacy as a time-to-event outcome. We model the marginal distribution of toxicity using a logistic regression and jointly model the times to efficacy and dropout using proportional hazard models to adjust for nonignorable dropouts. The correlation between times to efficacy and dropout is modeled using a shared frailty. We propose a two-stage dose-finding algorithm to adaptively assign patients to desirable doses. Simulation studies show that the proposed design has desirable operating characteristics. Our design selects the target dose with a high probability and assigns most patients to the target dose.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptive design; dose finding; dropout; nonignorable missing data; phase I/II trial

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25626676      PMCID: PMC4390488          DOI: 10.1002/sim.6443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  10 in total

1.  Dose-finding designs for HIV studies.

Authors:  J O'Quigley; M D Hughes; T Fenton
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Bayesian dose-finding in phase I/II clinical trials using toxicity and efficacy odds ratios.

Authors:  Guosheng Yin; Yisheng Li; Yuan Ji
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  An adaptive phase I design for identifying a biologically optimal dose for dual agent drug combinations.

Authors:  Sumithra J Mandrekar; Yue Cui; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer.

Authors:  J O'Quigley; M Pepe; L Fisher
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin in unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer: effects on survival and quality of life.

Authors:  M H Cullen; L J Billingham; C M Woodroffe; A D Chetiyawardana; N H Gower; R Joshi; D R Ferry; R M Rudd; S G Spiro; J E Cook; C Trask; E Bessell; C K Connolly; J Tobias; R L Souhami
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Simulation as a design tool for phase I/II clinical trials: an example from bone marrow transplantation.

Authors:  T A Gooley; P J Martin; L D Fisher; M Pettinger
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1994-12

7.  Dose-finding based on efficacy-toxicity trade-offs.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; John D Cook
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Low-dose thalidomide ameliorates cytopenias and splenomegaly in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia: a phase II trial.

Authors:  Monia Marchetti; Giovanni Barosi; Francesca Balestri; Gianluca Viarengo; Sara Gentili; Sara Barulli; Jean-Loup Demory; Fiorella Ilariucci; Antonio Volpe; Dominique Bordessoule; Alberto Grossi; Marie Caroline Le Bousse-Kerdiles; Andrea Caenazzo; Alessandro Pecci; Antonietta Falcone; Giorgio Broccia; Cesarina Bendotti; Fredric Bauduer; Francesco Buccisano; Brigitte Dupriez
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  A Bayesian Dose-finding Design for Oncology Clinical Trials of Combinational Biological Agents.

Authors:  Chunyan Cai; Ying Yuan; Yuan Ji
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 1.864

Review 10.  Experimental designs for phase I and phase I/II dose-finding studies.

Authors:  J O'Quigley; S Zohar
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Implementation of a Model-Based Design in a Phase Ib Study of Combined Targeted Agents.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Craig A Portell; Michael E Williams; Mark R Conaway; Gina R Petroni
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  A Bayesian Phase I/II Trial Design for Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Suyu Liu; Beibei Guo; Ying Yuan
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 5.033

3.  Seamless phase I/II design for novel anticancer agents with competing disease progression.

Authors:  Lucie Biard; Shing M Lee; Bin Cheng
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 2.497

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.