Literature DB >> 25626182

The RAZOR (randomized open vs robotic cystectomy) trial: study design and trial update.

Norm D Smith1, Erik P Castle, Mark L Gonzalgo, Robert S Svatek, Alon Z Weizer, Jeffrey S Montgomery, Raj S Pruthi, Michael E Woods, Matthew K Tollefson, Badrinath R Konety, Ahmad Shabsigh, Tracey Krupski, Daniel A Barocas, Atreya Dash, Marcus L Quek, Adam S Kibel, Dipen J Parekh.   

Abstract

The purpose of the RAZOR (randomized open vs robotic cystectomy) study is to compare open radical cystectomy (ORC) vs robot-assisted RC (RARC), pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) and urinary diversion for oncological outcomes, complications and health-related quality of life (HRQL) measures with a primary endpoint of 2-year progression-free survival (PFS). RAZOR is a multi-institutional, randomized, non-inferior, phase III trial that will enrol at least 320 patients with T1-T4, N0-N1, M0 bladder cancer with ≈160 patients in both the RARC and ORC arms at 15 participating institutions. Data will be collected prospectively at each institution for cancer outcomes, complications of surgery and HRQL measures, and then submitted to trial data management services Cancer Research and Biostatistics (CRAB) for final analyses. To date, 306 patients have been randomized and accrual to the RAZOR trial is expected to conclude in 2014. In this study, we report the RAZOR trial experimental design, objectives, data safety, and monitoring, and accrual update. The RAZOR trial is a landmark study in urological oncology, randomizing T1-T4, N0-N1, M0 patients with bladder cancer to ORC vs RARC, PLND and urinary diversion. RAZOR is a multi-institutional, non-inferiority trial evaluating cancer outcomes, surgical complications and HRQL measures of ORC vs RARC with a primary endpoint of 2-year PFS. Full data from the RAZOR trial are not expected until 2016-2017.
© 2014 The Authors. BJU International © 2014 BJU International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bladder cancer; clinical trials; cystectomy; robotics

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25626182      PMCID: PMC4906442          DOI: 10.1111/bju.12699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  18 in total

1.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Robotic radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in the management of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Ashok K Hemal; Hassan Abol-Enein; Ashutosh Tewari; Alok Shrivastava; Ahmed M Shoma; Mohammed A Ghoneim; Mani Menon
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.241

3.  Perioperative outcomes and oncologic efficacy from a pilot prospective randomized clinical trial of open versus robotic assisted radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Dipen J Parekh; Jamie Messer; John Fitzgerald; Barbara Ercole; Robert Svatek
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Complications after radical cystectomy: analysis of population-based data.

Authors:  Badrinath R Konety; Veerasathpurush Allareddy; Harry Herr
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Complications of radical cystectomy for nonmuscle invasive disease: comparison with muscle invasive disease.

Authors:  Michael S Cookson; Sam S Chang; Nancy Wells; Dipen J Parekh; Joseph A Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Functional independence after major abdominal surgery in the elderly.

Authors:  Valerie A Lawrence; Helen P Hazuda; John E Cornell; Thomas Pederson; Patrick T Bradshaw; Cynthia D Mulrow; Carey P Page
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Cancer statistics, 2012.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Deepa Naishadham; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Robotic vs open radical cystectomy: prospective comparison of perioperative outcomes and pathological measures of early oncological efficacy.

Authors:  Gerald J Wang; Daniel A Barocas; Jay D Raman; Douglas S Scherr
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Prospective randomized controlled trial of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative and pathologic results.

Authors:  Jeff Nix; Angela Smith; Raj Kurpad; Matthew E Nielsen; Eric M Wallen; Raj S Pruthi
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.

Authors:  Raza S Johar; Matthew H Hayn; Andrew P Stegemann; Kamran Ahmed; Piyush Agarwal; M Derya Balbay; Ashok Hemal; Adam S Kibel; Fred Muhletaler; Kenneth Nepple; John G Pattaras; James O Peabody; Joan Palou Redorta; Koon-Ho Rha; Lee Richstone; Matthias Saar; Francis Schanne; Douglas S Scherr; Stefan Siemer; Michael Stökle; Alon Weizer; Peter Wiklund; Timothy Wilson; Michael Woods; Bertrum Yuh; Khurshid A Guru
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  The Role of Robotics in the Invasive Management of Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Pramit Khetrapal; Wei Shen Tan; Benjamin Lamb; Melanie Tan; Hilary Baker; James Thompson; Ashwin Sridhar; John D Kelly; Tim Briggs
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Current Status of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy and Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion.

Authors:  Raj Kurpad; Michael Woods; Raj Pruthi
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Robotics in urology.

Authors:  Luke A McGuinness; Bhavan Prasad Rai
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  The Impact of Health Literacy on Surgical Outcomes Following Radical Cystectomy.

Authors:  Kristen R Scarpato; Stephen F Kappa; Kathryn M Goggins; Sam S Chang; Joseph A Smith; Peter E Clark; David F Penson; Matthew J Resnick; Daniel A Barocas; Kamran Idrees; Sunil Kripalani; Kelvin A Moses
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2016-09-23

Review 5.  Bladder cancer: ASCO endorses EAU muscle-invasive bladder cancer guidelines.

Authors:  Seth P Lerner
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 6.  Landmarks in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Niyati Lobo; Chloe Mount; Kawa Omar; Rajesh Nair; Ramesh Thurairaja; Muhammad Shamim Khan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 7.  Open radical cystectomy: still the gold standard for muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Bernhard Kiss; Fiona C Burkhard; George N Thalmann
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Why do patients decline surgical trials? Findings from a qualitative interview study embedded in the Cancer Research UK BOLERO trial (Bladder cancer: Open versus Lapararoscopic or RObotic cystectomy).

Authors:  Emily Harrop; John Kelly; Gareth Griffiths; Angela Casbard; Annmarie Nelson
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 9.  Contemporary evidence for robot-assisted radical cystectomy for treating bladder cancer.

Authors:  Raj Satkunasivam; Christopher J D Wallis; Robert K Nam; Mihir Desai; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 16.430

10.  A comparison of preliminary oncologic outcome and postoperative complications between patients undergoing either open or robotic radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Antonio Cusano; Peter Haddock; Max Jackson; Ilene Staff; Joseph Wagner; Anoop Meraney
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.