C H Lee1, E Y L Hui, Y C Woo, C Y Yeung, W S Chow, M M A Yuen, C H Y Fong, A Xu, K S L Lam. 1. Department of Medicine (C.H.L., E.Y.L.H., Y.C.W., C.Y.Y., W.S.C., M.M.A.Y., C.H.Y.F. A.X., K.S.L.L.), Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR; Research Centre of Heart, Brain, Hormone and Healthy Aging (E.Y.L.H., A.X., K.S.L.L.), The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR; and State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology (A.X., K.S.L.L.), The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Elevated fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) levels have been suggested, from cross-sectional studies, as an indicator of subclinical diabetic nephropathy. We investigated whether serum FGF21 was predictive of the development of diabetic nephropathy. METHOD: Baseline serum FGF21 levels were measured in 1136 Chinese type 2 diabetic subjects recruited from the Hong Kong West Diabetes Registry. The role of serum FGF21 in predicting decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over a median follow-up of 4 years was analyzed using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: At baseline, serum FGF21 levels increased progressively with eGFR category (P for trend <.001). Among 1071 subjects with baseline eGFR ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2), serum FGF21 levels were significantly higher in those with eGFR decline during follow-up (n = 171) than those without decline (n = 900) (P < .001). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, baseline serum FGF21 was independently associated with eGFR decline (hazard ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.43; P = .036), even after adjustment for baseline eGFR. In a subgroup of 559 subjects with baseline eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and normoalbuminuria, serum FGF21 level remained an independent predictor of eGFR decline (hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.06-1.76; P = .016). Integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) suggested that the inclusion of baseline serum FGF21 significantly improved the prediction of eGFR decline (IDI, 1%; 95% CI, 0.1-3.0; P = .013) in this subgroup, but not in the initial cohort involving all subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated serum FGF21 levels may be a useful biomarker for predicting kidney disease progression, especially in the early stages of diabetic nephropathy.
BACKGROUND: Elevated fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) levels have been suggested, from cross-sectional studies, as an indicator of subclinical diabetic nephropathy. We investigated whether serum FGF21 was predictive of the development of diabetic nephropathy. METHOD: Baseline serum FGF21 levels were measured in 1136 Chinese type 2 diabetic subjects recruited from the Hong Kong West Diabetes Registry. The role of serum FGF21 in predicting decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over a median follow-up of 4 years was analyzed using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: At baseline, serum FGF21 levels increased progressively with eGFR category (P for trend <.001). Among 1071 subjects with baseline eGFR ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2), serum FGF21 levels were significantly higher in those with eGFR decline during follow-up (n = 171) than those without decline (n = 900) (P < .001). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, baseline serum FGF21 was independently associated with eGFR decline (hazard ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.43; P = .036), even after adjustment for baseline eGFR. In a subgroup of 559 subjects with baseline eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and normoalbuminuria, serum FGF21 level remained an independent predictor of eGFR decline (hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.06-1.76; P = .016). Integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) suggested that the inclusion of baseline serum FGF21 significantly improved the prediction of eGFR decline (IDI, 1%; 95% CI, 0.1-3.0; P = .013) in this subgroup, but not in the initial cohort involving all subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated serum FGF21 levels may be a useful biomarker for predicting kidney disease progression, especially in the early stages of diabetic nephropathy.
Authors: Paulo Giovanni de Albuquerque Suassuna; Rogério Baumgratz de Paula; Hélady Sanders-Pinheiro; Orson W Moe; Ming-Chang Hu Journal: J Nephrol Date: 2018-11-14 Impact factor: 3.902
Authors: Kwok-Leung Ong; Andrzej S Januszewski; Rachel O'Connell; Luke Buizen; Alicia J Jenkins; Aimin Xu; David R Sullivan; Philip J Barter; Russell S Scott; Marja-Riitta Taskinen; Kerry-Anne Rye; Anthony C Keech Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2015-06-09 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Tomás P Griffin; William Patrick Martin; Nahidul Islam; Timothy O'Brien; Matthew D Griffin Journal: Curr Diab Rep Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 4.810
Authors: Elżbieta Niechciał; Carlo L Acerini; Scott T Chiesa; Tracey Stevens; R Neil Dalton; Denis Daneman; John E Deanfield; Timothy W Jones; Farid H Mahmud; Sally M Marshall; H Andrew W Neil; David B Dunger; M Loredana Marcovecchio Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2020-02-27 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: A Esteghamati; A Khandan; A Momeni; A Behdadnia; A Ghajar; M S Nikdad; S Noshad; M Nakhjavani; M Afarideh Journal: Ir J Med Sci Date: 2017-02-08 Impact factor: 1.568