| Literature DB >> 25625709 |
Git-Marie Ejneborn Looi1, Åsa Engström, Stefan Sävenstedt.
Abstract
Coercive measures are commonly used as a method of intervention, despite insufficient evidence for their effectiveness and benefits. The aim of this study was to describe how people who self-harm perceive alternatives to coercive measures in relation to actual experiences of psychiatric care. A total of 19 self-reports have been analysed with qualitative content analysis, resulting in three categories: a wish for understanding instead of neglect; a wish for mutual relation instead of distrust; a wish for professionalism instead of a counterproductive care. In conclusion, if the caregivers can understand and collaborate with the patient, there is seldom any need for coercive measures.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25625709 DOI: 10.3109/01612840.2014.951134
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Issues Ment Health Nurs ISSN: 0161-2840 Impact factor: 1.835