Literature DB >> 25625709

A self-destructive care: self-reports of people who experienced coercive measures and their suggestions for alternatives.

Git-Marie Ejneborn Looi1, Åsa Engström, Stefan Sävenstedt.   

Abstract

Coercive measures are commonly used as a method of intervention, despite insufficient evidence for their effectiveness and benefits. The aim of this study was to describe how people who self-harm perceive alternatives to coercive measures in relation to actual experiences of psychiatric care. A total of 19 self-reports have been analysed with qualitative content analysis, resulting in three categories: a wish for understanding instead of neglect; a wish for mutual relation instead of distrust; a wish for professionalism instead of a counterproductive care. In conclusion, if the caregivers can understand and collaborate with the patient, there is seldom any need for coercive measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25625709     DOI: 10.3109/01612840.2014.951134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Issues Ment Health Nurs        ISSN: 0161-2840            Impact factor:   1.835


  10 in total

1.  Increasing person-centeredness in psychosis inpatient care: staff experiences from the Person-Centered Psychosis Care (PCPC) project.

Authors:  K Allerby; A Goulding; L Ali; M Waern
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 2.908

2.  Patient safety in inpatient mental health settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bethan Thibaut; Lindsay Helen Dewa; Sonny Christian Ramtale; Danielle D'Lima; Sheila Adam; Hutan Ashrafian; Ara Darzi; Stephanie Archer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  "Voluntarily Admitted Against My Will": Patient Perspectives on Effects of, and Alternatives to, Coercion in Psychiatric Care for Self-Injury.

Authors:  Ellen Gerle; Anne Fischer; Lars-Gunnar Lundh
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2018-09-18

4.  A thematic analysis of care provider experiences of using self-harm abstinence agreements in psychiatric inpatient care.

Authors:  Jonas Bjärehed; Evelina Ingelsson Lindell; Sofie Westling
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2021-02-23

5.  Quality of interactions influences everyday life in psychiatric inpatient care--patients' perspectives.

Authors:  Jenny Molin; Ulla H Graneheim; Britt-Marie Lindgren
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2016-01-22

6.  Does 'Time Together' increase quality of interaction and decrease stress? A study protocol of a multisite nursing intervention in psychiatric inpatient care, using a mixed method approach.

Authors:  Jenny Molin; Britt-Marie Lindgren; Ulla Hällgren Graneheim; Anders Ringnér
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Does a new spatial design in psychiatric inpatient care influence patients' and staff's perception of their care/working environment? A study protocol of a pilot study using a single-system experimental design.

Authors:  Britt-Marie Lindgren; Jenny Molin; Mats Lundström; Maria Strömbäck; Ellinor Salander Renberg; Anders Ringnér
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2018-12-26

8.  Brief admission (BA) for patients with emotional instability and self-harm: nurses' perspectives - person-centred care in clinical practice.

Authors:  Joachim Eckerström; Emelie Allenius; Marjolein Helleman; Lena Flyckt; Kent-Inge Perseius; Pernilla Omerov
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2019-12

9.  'Don't abandon me': Young people's experiences of child and adolescent psychiatric inpatient care supporting recovery described in blogs.

Authors:  Rebecca Wallström; Eva Lindgren; Sebastian Gabrielsson
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.503

10.  A Qualitative Account of Young People's Experiences Seeking Care from Emergency Departments for Self-Harm.

Authors:  Sadhbh J Byrne; India Bellairs-Walsh; Simon M Rice; Sarah Bendall; Michelle Lamblin; Emily Boubis; Brianna McGregor; Meghan O'Keefe; Jo Robinson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.