| Literature DB >> 25625513 |
Dongyang Jiang1, Jing Ge2, Qinyuan Liao3, Junfan Ma4, Yang Liu5, Jing Huang6, Chong Wang7, Weiyan Xu8, Jie Zheng9, Wenwei Shao10, Gregory Lee11, Xiaoyan Qiu12.
Abstract
The innate immune system of the skin is thought to depend largely on a multi-layered mechanical barrier supplemented by epidermis-derived antimicrobial peptides. To date, there are no reports of antimicrobial antibody secretion by the epidermis. In this study, we report the expression of functional immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin A (IgA), previously thought to be only produced by B cells, in normal human epidermal cells and the human keratinocyte line HaCaT. While B cells express a fully diverse Ig, epidermal cell-expressed IgG or IgA showed one or two conservative VHDJH rearrangements in each individual. These unique VDJ rearrangements in epidermal cells were found neither in the B cell-derived Ig VDJ databases published by others nor in our positive controls. IgG and IgA from epidermal cells of the same individual had different VDJ rearrangement patterns. IgG was found primarily in prickle cells, and IgA was mainly detected in basal cells. Both epidermal cell-derived IgG and IgA showed potential antibody activity by binding pathogens like Staphylococcus aureus, the most common pathogenic skin bacteria, but the microbial-binding profile was different. Our data indicates that normal human epidermal cells spontaneously express IgG and IgA, and we speculate that these Igs participate in skin innate immunity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25625513 PMCID: PMC4346852 DOI: 10.3390/ijms16022574
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin A (IgA) distribution in normal skin epidermis detected by immunostaining. (A) Immunohistochemical staining with commercial anti-IgG antibody, RP215 and anti-IgA antibody of paraffin-embedded sections of normal skin tissues. Arrows denote immunoreactivity of Ig; (B) Immunofluorescence staining with commercial anti-IgG antibody, RP215 and anti-IgA antibody in frozen sections of normal skin tissues. Green: immunostaining of Ig, blue: nucleus staining by Hochest 33342. Arrows denote immunoreactivity of Ig.
Figure 2Expression of IgG and IgA in epidermal cells. (A) IgG or IgA expression in separated epidermal cells and HaCaT cell line determined by Western blotting using commercial anti-IgG antibody and RP215, or anti-IgA antibody, respectively. 1–5: epidermis samples. Arrows indicate immunoreactivity of IgG or IgA; (B) IgG purification by affinity chromatography with protein G sepharose. The protein band indicated by the arrow was further analyzed by mass spectrometry.
Figure 3Transcription of IgG and IgA heavy chain gene in epidermal cells. (A) Immunohistochemistry staining of pan-cytokeratin (pan-CK) and CD20 in normal skin tissue and separated epidermis layer. Infiltrated B cells in the lung cancer tissue were used as positive control of CD20; (B) Rearranged IgG and IgA heavy chain variable region (Igγ-V and Igα-V) gene transcripts in isolated epidermis detected by RT-PCR. CD19 transcripts were detected to evaluate possible B cell contamination in isolated epidermis. PBMC: peripheral blood mononuclear cell as positive control; 1 and 2: epidermis samples from Case 1 and Case 2; control: PCR reaction mixture without templates as negative control; (C) IgG and IgA heavy chain constant region (Igγ-C and Igα-C) gene transcripts in HaCaT cell line detected by RT-PCR. PBMC as positive control and PCR reaction mixture without templates as negative control (control).
VHDJH recombinations of IgG and IgA heavy chain gene in epidermal cells.
| Case | Igγ | Igα | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clone | No. of Clones | VHDJH Recombination | V Segment Identity (%) with Germlines | Clone | No. of Clones | VHDJH Recombination | V Segment Identity (%) with Germlines | ||||||||
| Case 1 | 1 | 1 | VH1-2*02/D5-18*01/JH6*03 | 98.0 | 1 | 1 | VH7-4-1*02/D6-13*01/JH6*02 | 84.0 | |||||||
| 2 | 1 | VH1-2*02/D5-18*01/JH6*03 | 98.8 | 2 | 1 | VH7-4-1*02/D6-13*01/JH6*02 | 84.3 | ||||||||
| 3 | 1 | VH1-2*02/D5-18*01/JH6*03 | 98.4 | 3 | 1 | VH5-10-1*01/D2-2*01/JH3*03 | 79.9 | ||||||||
| 4 | 1 | VH1-2*02/D5-18*01/JH6*03 | 98.4 | 4 | 1 | VH5-10-1*01/D2-2*01/JH3*03 | 81.3 | ||||||||
| Case 2 | 1–6 | 6 | VH2-5*02/D2-21*02/JH4*02 | 96.3 | 1–2 | 2 | VH1-3*01/D4-17*01/JH1*01 | 77.4 | |||||||
| 7 | 1 | VH2-5*02/D2-21*02/JH4*02 | 96.3 | 3 | 1 | VH1-3*01/D4-17*01/JH1*01 | 78.8 | ||||||||
| 8 | 1 | VH2-5*02/D2-21*02/JH4*02 | 95.9 | 4 | 1 | VH1-3*01/D4-17*01/JH1*01 | 79.2 | ||||||||
| 9 | 1 | VH2-5*02/D2-21*02/JH4*02 | 95.9 | 5 | 1 | VH1-3*01/D4-17*01/JH4*02 | 79.2 | ||||||||
| 6 | 1 | VH1-3*01/D4-17*01/JH4*02 | 78.8 | ||||||||||||
| PBMC (Control) | 1 | 1 | VH1-69*13/D2-21*01/JH4*02 | 80.6 | 1 | 1 | VH1-46*01/D2-21*02/JH4*02 | 78.1 | |||||||
| 2 | 1 | VH1-8*01/D6-13*01/JH4*02 | 83.0 | 2 | 1 | VH1-2*02/D2-21*02/JH4*02 | 81.9 | ||||||||
| 3 | 1 | VH1-46*01/D1-7*01/JH4*02 | 90.5 | 3 | 1 | VH1-3*01/D1-7*01/JH4*02 | 81.6 | ||||||||
| 4 | 1 | VH4-59*03/D6-6*01/JH6*02 | 94.8 | 4 | 1 | VH4-59*08/D2-8*02/JH4*02 | 82.5 | ||||||||
| 5 | 1 | VH3-11*04/D5-12*01/JH5*02 | 85.7 | 5 | 1 | VH1-18*01/D3-3*01/JH4*02 | 81.9 | ||||||||
| 6 | 1 | VH4-34*01/D3-10*01/JH6*02 | 92.9 | ||||||||||||
| 7 | 1 | VH3-23*01/D6-13*01/JH4*02 | 91.7 | ||||||||||||
| 8 | 1 | VH3-74*03/D1-26*01/JH5*02 | 91.8 | ||||||||||||
Figure 4The binding of epidermis-derived IgG (A) and IgA (B) to E. coli strains DH10B and BL21, S. aureus strains Cowan I and ATCC 25923, clinical isolated strain of S. epidermidis, and C. albicans strain SC5314 was analyzed by ELISA. (A) Binding of IgG (a) and IgA (b) in epidermis tissue lysates from five healthy donors to microbes was analyzed by ELISA. 50μg/mL microbes were coated for testing Ig binding, vehicle as negative control. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Student’s t-tests were performed when mean of microbes-coated group was higher than vehicle control. Statistical significance: ns means no significant difference, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.001 vs. vehicle control; (B) The microbial-binding activity of secreted IgG (a) and IgA (b) by HaCaT was analyzed by ELISA. Cell culture supernatant was collected 24 h after stimulation with different microbes (50 μg/mL). IgG and IgA with microbial-binding activity were captured from the supernatant by different microbes coated at 50 μg/mL and were detected with anti-IgG and anti-IgA antibodies, respectively. All data are calibrated by minus OD450 of culture medium control and presented as mean ± SD. Student’s t-tests were performed when mean of microbe stimulation group was higher than vehicle stimulation control. Statistical significance: ns means no significant difference, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.001 vs. vehicle stimulation control.