Literature DB >> 25624194

Routine use of next-generation sequencing for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of blastomeres obtained from embryos on day 3 in fresh in vitro fertilization cycles.

Krzysztof Łukaszuk1, Sebastian Pukszta2, Dagan Wells3, Celina Cybulska2, Joanna Liss2, Łukasz Płóciennik2, Waldemar Kuczyński4, Judyta Zabielska2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the usefulness of semiconductor-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) for cleavage-stage preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) of aneuploidy.
DESIGN: Prospective case-control study.
SETTING: A private center for reproductive medicine. PATIENT(S): A total of 45 patients underwent day-3 embryo biopsy with PGD and fresh cycle transfer. Additionally, 53 patients, matched according to age, anti-Müllerian hormone levels, antral follicles count, and infertility duration were selected as controls. INTERVENTION(S): Choice of embryos for transfer was based on the PGD NGS results. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy rate (PR) per embryo transfer (ET) was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were implantation and miscarriage rates. RESULT(S): The PR per transfer was higher in the NGS group (84.4% vs. 41.5%). The implantation rate (61.5% vs. 34.8%) was higher in the NGS group. The miscarriage rate was similar in the 2 groups (2.8% vs. 4.6%). CONCLUSION(S): We demonstrate the technical feasibility of NGS-based PGD involving cleavage-stage biopsy and fresh ETs. Encouraging data were obtained from a prospective trial using this approach, arguing that cleavage-stage NGS may represent a valuable addition to current aneuploidy screening methods. These findings require further validation in a well-designed randomized controlled trial. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12614001035617.
Copyright © 2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Next-generation sequencing; aneuploidy screening; genotyping; preimplantation genetic diagnosis; semiconductor-based sequencer

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25624194     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  13 in total

1.  Pregnancy and child developmental outcomes after preimplantation genetic screening: a meta-analytic and systematic review.

Authors:  Misaki N Natsuaki; Laura M Dimler
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 2.764

Review 2.  Recent advances in preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening.

Authors:  Lina Lu; Bo Lv; Kevin Huang; Zhigang Xue; Xianmin Zhu; Guoping Fan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Novel PGD strategy based on single sperm linkage analysis for carriers of single gene pathogenic variant and chromosome reciprocal translocation.

Authors:  Yuqian Wang; Xiaohui Zhu; Zhiqiang Yan; Xu Zhi; Shuo Guan; Ying Kuo; Yanli Nie; Ying Lian; Jin Huang; Yuan Wei; Ping Liu; Rong Li; Jie Qiao; Liying Yan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Molecular analysis of DNA in blastocoele fluid using next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Yixin Zhang; Na Li; Li Wang; Huiying Sun; Minyue Ma; Hui Wang; Xiaofei Xu; Wenke Zhang; Yingyu Liu; David S Cram; Baofa Sun; Yuanqing Yao
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic test and technical tips: A review.

Authors:  Naoki Aoyama; Keiichi Kato
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2020-01-26

6.  Application of next-generation sequencing for 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening of human preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  Haiyan Zheng; Hua Jin; Lian Liu; Jianqiao Liu; Wei-Hua Wang
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  Clinical Considerations of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for Monogenic Diseases.

Authors:  Xiaokun Hu; Jing Wang; Yubin Li; Yizi Wang; Chenhui Ding; Yanhong Zeng; Yanwen Xu; Canquan Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Can Comprehensive Chromosome Screening Technology Improve IVF/ICSI Outcomes? A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Minghao Chen; Shiyou Wei; Junyan Hu; Song Quan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comparative study of single-nucleotide polymorphism array and next generation sequencing based strategies on triploid identification in preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screen.

Authors:  Jiawei Xu; Wenbin Niu; Zhaofeng Peng; Xiao Bao; Meixiang Zhang; Linlin Wang; Linqing Du; Nan Zhang; Yingpu Sun
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-12-06

10.  Improved clinical outcomes of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy using MALBAC-NGS compared with MDA-SNP array.

Authors:  Wenbin Niu; Linlin Wang; Jiawei Xu; Ying Li; Hao Shi; Gang Li; Haixia Jin; Wenyan Song; Fang Wang; Yingpu Sun
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.