Literature DB >> 25624175

Prognostic and therapeutic implications of early treatment response assessment in acute myeloid leukemia.

Vinod Pullarkat1, Ibrahim Aldoss2.   

Abstract

Early assessment of disease response to induction chemotherapy is important in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in order to plan future therapy and identify chemorefractory disease. Such assessment is customarily performed by examining the bone marrow at around day 14 after initiation of chemotherapy. However, criteria for assessment of residual leukemia in day 14 bone marrow specimens as well as the significance of partial response on long term outcomes remain unclear. Clinical practices vary regarding the therapeutic intervention for residual disease and include readministration of the original induction therapy or use of a different reinduction regimen. In this article, we critically examine the prognostic significance of residual disease detected on interim bone marrow examination as well as data on reinduction therapy with the original induction regimen versus an alternate regimen. We emphasize the need for standardizing reporting of interim bone marrow assessment as well as evaluating new technologies and biomarkers for early assessment of disease response and chemosensitivity in AML.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute myeloid leukemia; Chemosensitivity; Day 14 bone marrow; Early response; Reinduction

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25624175     DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol        ISSN: 1040-8428            Impact factor:   6.312


  6 in total

1.  Peripheral blood blast clearance is an independent prognostic factor for survival and response to acute myeloid leukemia induction chemotherapy.

Authors:  Nicholas J Short; Christopher B Benton; Hsiang-Chun Chen; Peng Qiu; Lisa Gu; Sherry Pierce; Mark Brandt; Abhishek Maiti; Taejin L Min; Kiran Naqvi; Alfonso Quintas-Cardama; Marina Konopleva; Tapan Kadia; Jorge Cortes; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Farhad Ravandi; Elias Jabbour; Hagop Kantarjian; Michael Andreeff
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 10.047

2.  Early peripheral clearance of leukemia-associated immunophenotypes in AML: centralized analysis of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Giacomo Gianfaldoni; Francesco Mannelli; Tamara Intermesoli; Sara Bencini; Damiano Giupponi; Giorgio Farina; Ilaria Cutini; Maria Ida Bonetti; Arianna Masciulli; Ernesta Audisio; Dario Ferrero; Chiara Pavoni; Anna Maria Scattolin; Alberto Bosi; Alessandro Rambaldi; Renato Bassan
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-01-28

3.  Evaluation of bone marrow aspirates in patients with acute myeloid leukemia at day 14 of induction therapy.

Authors:  João Tadeu D Souto Filho; Monique M Loureiro; Wolmar Pulcheri; José Carlos Morais; Marcio Nucci; Rodrigo D Portugal
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 2.644

4.  Lipidomic approach for stratification of acute myeloid leukemia patients.

Authors:  Adam Stefanko; Christian Thiede; Gerhard Ehninger; Kai Simons; Michal Grzybek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  In-silico comparison of two induction regimens (7 + 3 vs 7 + 3 plus additional bone marrow evaluation) in acute myeloid leukemia treatment.

Authors:  Jan Christoph Banck; Dennis Görlich
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2019-01-31

6.  Acute myeloid leukemia: negative prognostic impact of early blast persistence can be in part overcome by a later remission prior to post-induction therapy.

Authors:  Jana Ihlow; Sophia Gross; Leonie Busack; Anne Flörcken; Julia Jesse; Michaela Schwarz; Nina Rosa Neuendorff; Ann-Christin von Brünneck; Ioannis Anagnostopoulos; Seval Türkmen; Igor Wolfgang Blau; Thomas Burmeister; David Horst; Lars Bullinger; Jörg Westermann
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 11.047

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.