Aimee K Gardner1, Daniel J Scott2, Michael A Choti2, John C Mansour2. 1. Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. Electronic address: aimee.gardner@utsouthwestern.edu. 2. Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: In an effort to move training programs toward competency-based education, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) introduced the Next Accreditation System (NAS), which organizes specific milestones regarding resident skills, knowledge, and abilities along a continuum. In order to foster innovation and creativity, the ACGME has provided programs with minimal guidelines regarding the optimal way to approach these milestones. METHODS: The education team at UT Southwestern embraced the milestones and developed a process in which performance assessment methods were critically evaluated, mapped onto an extrapolated performance list corresponding to the areas required by the ACGME milestones, and filled gaps in the previous system by modifying evaluation tools and creating new program components. RESULTS: Although the authors are early in the evolution of applying the new milestones system, this approach has thus far allowed them to comprehensively evaluate the residents and the program in an efficient and effective fashion, with notable improvements compared to the prior approach. CONCLUSIONS: The authors hope that these experiences can inform others embarking upon similar journeys with the milestones.
OBJECTIVES: In an effort to move training programs toward competency-based education, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) introduced the Next Accreditation System (NAS), which organizes specific milestones regarding resident skills, knowledge, and abilities along a continuum. In order to foster innovation and creativity, the ACGME has provided programs with minimal guidelines regarding the optimal way to approach these milestones. METHODS: The education team at UT Southwestern embraced the milestones and developed a process in which performance assessment methods were critically evaluated, mapped onto an extrapolated performance list corresponding to the areas required by the ACGME milestones, and filled gaps in the previous system by modifying evaluation tools and creating new program components. RESULTS: Although the authors are early in the evolution of applying the new milestones system, this approach has thus far allowed them to comprehensively evaluate the residents and the program in an efficient and effective fashion, with notable improvements compared to the prior approach. CONCLUSIONS: The authors hope that these experiences can inform others embarking upon similar journeys with the milestones.
Keywords:
Interpersonal and Communication Skills; Medical Knowledge; Patient Care; Practice-Based Learning and Improvement; Professionalism; Systems-Based Practice; competency; education; evaluation; milestones; surgery residency
Authors: Kimberly Baker-Genaw; Maria S Kokas; Syed F Ahsan; Deborah Darnley-Fisch; Sean Drake; Nikhil Goyal; Kedar Inamdar; Vasilios Moutzouros; Deepak Prabhakar; Laurie Rolland; Roopina Sangha; Maria Shreve; Ann Woodward Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2016-07
Authors: Naileshni Singh; Alison A Nielsen; David J Copenhaver; Samir J Sheth; Chin-Shang Li; Scott M Fishman Journal: Pain Med Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Joseph M Blankush; Brijen J Shah; Scott H Barnett; Gaber Badran; Amanda Mercado; Reena Karani; David Muller; I Michael Leitman Journal: Ann Med Surg (Lond) Date: 2017-03-06
Authors: Ahmad E Aboshaiqah; Regie B Tumala; Joel G Patalagsa; Ahmed A Al-Khaibary; Haya Al Fozan; John Paul Ben Journal: Ann Saudi Med Date: 2018 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.526