F Aïm1, J Delambre2, T Bauer2, P Hardy2. 1. Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, hôpital Ambroise-Paré, 9, avenue Charles-de-Gaulle, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France. Electronic address: florenceaim@gmail.com. 2. Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, hôpital Ambroise-Paré, 9, avenue Charles-de-Gaulle, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Septic arthritis is a diagnostic and therapeutic emergency that threatens both life and function. The primary objective of this study was to assess the efficacy on the infectious process of arthroscopic treatment in patients with septic arthritis of native joints. The secondary objective was to identify factors predicting failure to achieve infection resolution after arthroscopic treatment. We hypothesised that arthroscopy was the appropriate treatment strategy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-six cases of septic arthritis in 46 patients with a mean age of 46 years (range, 18-72 years) were retrospectively reviewed. The cause of the septic arthritis was haematogenous dissemination in 39.1% of patients, surgery in 34.8%, a local injection in 19.6%, and trauma in 6.5%. The involved joint was the knee in 32 patients, the shoulder in 6, the hip in 3, the ankle in 3, and the elbow in 2. All patients underwent arthroscopic joint lavage, with or without synovectomy depending on the Gächter stage. Dual antibiotic therapy was given routinely after the procedure. For each patient, we assessed time to treatment, intraoperative findings according to the Gächter classification, cultures of drainage-fluids, and whether repeat arthroscopic lavage was required. Recovery of the infection was defined as absence of clinical or laboratory signs of infection at last follow-up. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 42 months (range, 1-120). Mean time from symptom onset to arthroscopic treatment was 7.5 days. Full recovery of the infection was achieved in 93% of patients, although 25% required more than one arthroscopic lavage. Factors significantly associated with arthroscopic treatment failure were Gächter stage III or IV and positive drainage-fluid cultures after 24h. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic treatment is indicated in all patients with septic arthritis on native joints. The procedure should be repeated if the initial course is unfavourable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV. Retrospective study.
BACKGROUND:Septic arthritis is a diagnostic and therapeutic emergency that threatens both life and function. The primary objective of this study was to assess the efficacy on the infectious process of arthroscopic treatment in patients with septic arthritis of native joints. The secondary objective was to identify factors predicting failure to achieve infection resolution after arthroscopic treatment. We hypothesised that arthroscopy was the appropriate treatment strategy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-six cases of septic arthritis in 46 patients with a mean age of 46 years (range, 18-72 years) were retrospectively reviewed. The cause of the septic arthritis was haematogenous dissemination in 39.1% of patients, surgery in 34.8%, a local injection in 19.6%, and trauma in 6.5%. The involved joint was the knee in 32 patients, the shoulder in 6, the hip in 3, the ankle in 3, and the elbow in 2. All patients underwent arthroscopic joint lavage, with or without synovectomy depending on the Gächter stage. Dual antibiotic therapy was given routinely after the procedure. For each patient, we assessed time to treatment, intraoperative findings according to the Gächter classification, cultures of drainage-fluids, and whether repeat arthroscopic lavage was required. Recovery of the infection was defined as absence of clinical or laboratory signs of infection at last follow-up. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 42 months (range, 1-120). Mean time from symptom onset to arthroscopic treatment was 7.5 days. Full recovery of the infection was achieved in 93% of patients, although 25% required more than one arthroscopic lavage. Factors significantly associated with arthroscopic treatment failure were Gächter stage III or IV and positive drainage-fluid cultures after 24h. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic treatment is indicated in all patients with septic arthritis on native joints. The procedure should be repeated if the initial course is unfavourable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV. Retrospective study.
Authors: Heinrich M L Mühlhofer; Susanne Feihl; Ingo J Banke; Christian Suren; Florian Pohlig; Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe Journal: Orthopade Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 1.087
Authors: Ajay S Padaki; Gabrielle C Ma; Nicole M Truong; Charles J Cogan; Drew A Lansdown; Brian T Feeley; C Benjamin Ma; Alan L Zhang Journal: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Date: 2022-05-27
Authors: Seth Stake; Ryan Scully; Samuel Swenson; Danny Lee; Ryan Lee; Andrew Sparks; Rajeev Pandarinath Journal: J Clin Orthop Trauma Date: 2019-12-13
Authors: Daniel J Johnson; Bennet A Butler; Matthew J Hartwell; Claire E Fernandez; Richard W Nicolay; Ryan S Selley; Michael A Terry; Vehniah K Tjong Journal: J Orthop Date: 2019-11-27
Authors: Bryan Josué Flores-Robles; Mercedes Jiménez Palop; Abel Alejandro Sanabria Sanchinel; Robert Francis Andrus; Ana Royuela Vicente; Marta Isabel Sanz Pérez; María Espinosa Malpartida; Consuelo Ramos Giráldez; Carolina Merino Argumanez; Luis Fernando Villa Alcázar; José Luis Andréu Sánchez; Hildegarda Godoy Tundidor; José Campos Esteban; Jesús Sanz Sanz; Carmen Barbadillo Mateos; Carlos Isasi Zaragoza; Juan Mulero Mendoza Journal: J Clin Rheumatol Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 3.517