Literature DB >> 25620298

State policy and teen childbearing: a review of research studies.

Martha A Beltz1, Vanessa H Sacks2, Kristin A Moore2, Mary Terzian3.   

Abstract

Teen childbearing is affected by many individual, family, and community factors; however, another potential influence is state policy. Rigorous studies of the relationship between state policy and teen birth rates are few in number but represent a body of knowledge that can inform policy and practice. This article reviews research assessing associations between state-level policies and teen birth rates, focusing on five policy areas: access to family planning, education, sex education, public assistance, and access to abortion services. Overall, several studies have found that measures related to access to and use of family planning services and contraceptives are related to lower state-level teen birth rates. These include adolescent enrollment in clinics, minors' access to contraception, conscience laws, family planning expenditures, and Medicaid waivers. Other studies, although largely cross-sectional analyses, have concluded that policies and practices to expand or improve public education are also associated with lower teen birth rates. These include expenditures on education, teacher-to-student ratios, and graduation requirements. However, the evidence regarding the role of public assistance, abortion access, and sex education policies in reducing teen birth rates is mixed and inconclusive. These conclusions must be viewed as tentative because of the limited number of rigorous studies that examine the relationship between state policy and teen birth rates over time. Many specific policies have only been analyzed by a single study, and few findings are based on recent data. As such, more research is needed to strengthen our understanding of the role of state policies in teen birth rates.
Copyright © 2015 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abortion; Education; Family planning; Public assistance; Sex education; State policy; Teen childbearing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25620298     DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adolesc Health        ISSN: 1054-139X            Impact factor:   5.012


  8 in total

1.  Medicaid Family Planning Expansions: The Effect of State Plan Amendments on Postpartum Contraceptive Use.

Authors:  Sara K Redd; Kelli Stidham Hall
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 2.  Parenting Among Adolescents and Young Adults with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection in the United States: Challenges, Unmet Needs, and Opportunities.

Authors:  Kendra Hatfield-Timajchy; Jennifer L Brown; Lisa B Haddad; Rana Chakraborty; Athena P Kourtis
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 5.078

3.  Changes in Adolescent Birth Rates within Appalachian Subregions and Non-Appalachian Counties in the United States, 2012-2018.

Authors:  Nathan Hale; Kathleen Tatro; Sylvester Olubolu Orimaye; Michael Smith; Michael Meit; Kate E Beatty; Amal Khoury
Journal:  J Appalach Health       Date:  2022-02-13

4.  Declines in Crime and Teen Childbearing: Identifying Potential Explanations for Contemporaneous Trends.

Authors:  Cynthia G Colen; David M Ramey; Christopher R Browning
Journal:  J Quant Criminol       Date:  2016-02-29

Review 5.  Contraception for HIV-Infected Adolescents.

Authors:  Athena P Kourtis; Ayesha Mirza
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Isolated Voices: Perspectives of Teachers, School Nurses, and Administrators Regarding Implementation of Sexual Health Education Policy.

Authors:  Elizabeth Dickson; Mark Parshall; Claire D Brindis
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2019-12-08       Impact factor: 2.118

7.  An Analysis of Adolescent Content in South Africa's Contraception Policy Using a Human Rights Framework.

Authors:  Andrea J Hoopes; Venkatraman Chandra-Mouli; Petrus Steyn; Tlangelani Shilubane; Melanie Pleaner
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.012

8.  A county-level cross-sectional analysis of positive deviance to assess multiple population health outcomes in Indiana.

Authors:  Michael Hendryx; Lucia Guerra-Reyes; Benjamin D Holland; Michael Dean McGinnis; Emily Meanwell; Susan E Middlestadt; Karen M Yoder
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.