| Literature DB >> 25619566 |
Sarah L Szanton1, Rachel K Walker2, Laken Roberts3, Roland J Thorpe4, Jennifer Wolff2, Emily Agree5, David L Roth6, Laura N Gitlin7, Christopher Seplaki8.
Abstract
Activity is associated with health among older adults yet older adults' favorite activities have rarely been investigated. We analyzed the community dwelling, cognitively-intact sample of NHATS, a nationally representative sample of adults ≥ 65, who had named their favorite activities (N = 5247). Logistic regression models estimated the odds of choosing a physical activity controlling for demographics, self-rated health, and disability. For all ages, four of the top five most common favorite activities were active: walking/jogging (14%), outdoor maintenance (13%), playing sports (8.9%), and other physical activity (8.7%). These findings sustain in 65-75 year olds. Even in 80-84 year olds, 3 of the top five activities are active. These findings vary by self-rated health (OR = 0.71, p < 0.001), disability (OR = 0.72, p < 0.001) and gender (OR = 0.52, p < 0.001). Policy makers, clinicians, and urban planners can use these results in their work.Entities:
Keywords: Activities; Participation; Physical activity
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25619566 PMCID: PMC4775165 DOI: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2014.12.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Geriatr Nurs ISSN: 0197-4572 Impact factor: 2.361
Percentage and ranking of older adults’ favorite Activity.
| Activity | Percent (%) | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| 14.00 | 1 | |
| 12.64 | 2 | |
| 8.91 | 3 | |
| Reading | 8.81 | 4 |
| 8.73 | 5 | |
| 6.77 | 6 | |
| Arts, crafts, hobbies | 5.50 | 7 |
| Puzzles/games not on computer | 4.04 | 8 |
| Socializing in person | 3.95 | 9 |
| No favorite activity | 2.99 | 10 |
| Watching TV/movies | 2.85 | 11 |
| 1.81 | 12 | |
| 1.50 | 13 | |
| 1.23 | 14 | |
| Going out to eat | 1.20 | 15 |
| 1.09 | 16 | |
| 1.08 | 17 | |
| Other religious activities | 0.99 | 18 |
| Computer leisure activities | 0.97 | 19 |
| Attending religious activities | 0.90 | 20 |
| Work | 0.86 | 21 |
| Watch sporting events | 0.69 | 22 |
| Animal care | 0.67 | 23 |
| Puzzles/games on computer | 0.56 | 24 |
| Gambling at a casino | 0.55 | 25 |
| 0.54 | 26 | |
| 0.50 | 27 | |
| Attending movies | 0.50 | 28 |
Bolded text denotes physical activities.
Respondent demographic characteristics.
| Characteristic | Those that list a “physical activity” as favorite ( | Those that list a “non-physical” activity as favorite ( | Total ( | χ2 ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, % | 110.19 (<0.000) | |||
| 65–69 | 26.5 | 19.2 | 23.6 | |
| 70–74 | 26.3 | 21.3 | 24.3 | |
| 75–79 | 21.0 | 21.0 | 21.0 | |
| 80–84 | 15.7 | 21.4 | 18.0 | |
| 85–89 | 7.6 | 11.1 | 9.0 | |
| 90+ | 2.9 | 6.0 | 4.1 | |
| Gender, % | 113.03 (<0.000) | |||
| Male | 48.0 | 33.2 | 42.0 | |
| Female | 52.0 | 66.8 | 58.0 | |
| Race, % | 19.12 (0.0003) | |||
| White, Non-Hispanic | 70.7 | 75.5 | 72.7 | |
| Black, Non-Hispanic | 20.6 | 18.0 | 19.6 | |
| Hispanic | 5.0 | 4.3 | 4.7 | |
| Other | 3.8 | 2.2 | 3.0 | |
| Living arrangement, % | 23.45 (<0.000) | |||
| With others | 71.7 | 65.4 | 69.2 | |
| Alone | 28.3 | 34.6 | 30.8 | |
| Self-rated health, % | 145.55 (<0.000) | |||
| 1 – Excellent | 17.8 | 9.9 | 14.6 | |
| 2 – Very Good | 32.1 | 26.2 | 29.7 | |
| 3 – Good | 31.2 | 34.4 | 32.5 | |
| 4 – Fair | 15.5 | 21.8 | 18.0 | |
| 5 – Poor | 3.4 | 7.7 | 5.2 | |
| Income, % | 48.70 (<0.000) | |||
| < $10,000 | 8.6 | 10.2 | 9.2 | |
| $10,000 –$20,000 | 18.3 | 23.6 | 20.4 | |
| $20,000 –$30,000 | 15.4 | 16.7 | 15.9 | |
| $30,000 –$40,000 | 13.5 | 12.7 | 13.2 | |
| $40,000 –$50,000 | 9.1 | 9.2 | 9.1 | |
| $50,000 –$60,000 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 7.6 | |
| $60,000 –$70,000 | 5.4 | 4.1 | 4.9 | |
| $70,000 –$80,000 | 5.2 | 4.0 | 4.7 | |
| $80,000 –$90,000 | 3.6 | 3.3 | 3.5 | |
| $90,000 –$100,000 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 1.9 | |
| > $100,000 | 10.9 | 7.6 | 9.6 |
Pearson χ2.
Logistic regression analysis of the association between choosing a “physical activity” as favorite and decreasing self rated health (N = 5247).
| Variables | Odds ratio | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Self rated health (5 = poor, 1 = excellent) | 0.71 | |
| Gender | 0.52 | |
| Race | ||
| White, non-Hispanic | 1.0 (ref) | |
| Black, non-Hispanic | 1.40 | |
| Hispanic | 1.48 | |
| Other | 1.84 | |
| Age categories | ||
| 65–69 | 1.0 (ref) | |
| 70–74 | 0.92 | (0.79, 1.07) |
| 75–79 | 0.77 | |
| 80–84 | 0.59 | |
| 85–89 | 0.54 | |
| 90+ | 0.41 | |
| Living alone | 0.95 | (0.82, 1.12) |
| Income | ||
| < $10,000 | 1.0 (ref) | |
| $10,000–$20,000 | 0.84 | (0.64, 1.10) |
| $20,000–$30,000 | 0.96 | (0.71, 1.30) |
| $30,000–$40,000 | 0.99 | (0.72, 1.35) |
| $40,000–$50,000 | 0.80 | (0.57, 1.13) |
| $50,000–$60,000 | 0.94 | (0.67, 1.33) |
| $60,000–$70,000 | 0.98 | (0.63, 1.54) |
| $70,000–$80,000 | 0.82 | (0.56, 1.22) |
| $80,000–$90,000 | 0.78 | (0.53, 1.16) |
| $90,000–$100,000 | 1.07 | (0.64, 1.77) |
| >$100,000 | 0.94 | (0.65, 1.35) |
CI = confidence interval.
Bolded confidence intervals indicate significance (p < 0.05).
Reference group is male.
Reference group is living with others.