Literature DB >> 25619471

Integrating voice evaluation: correlation between acoustic and audio-perceptual measures.

Susana Vaz Freitas1, Pedro Melo Pestana2, Vítor Almeida3, Aníbal Ferreira3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: This article aims to establish correlations between acoustic and audio-perceptual measures using the GRBAS scale with respect to four different voice analysis software programs. STUDY
DESIGN: Exploratory, transversal.
METHODS: A total of 90 voice records were collected and analyzed with the Dr. Speech (Tiger Electronics, Seattle, WA), Multidimensional Voice Program (Kay Elemetrics, NJ, USA), PRAAT (University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands), and Voice Studio (Seegnal, Oporto, Portugal) software programs. The acoustic measures were correlated to the audio-perceptual parameters of the GRBAS and rated by 10 experts.
RESULTS: The predictive value of the acoustic measurements related to the audio-perceptual parameters exhibited magnitudes ranging from weak (R(2)a=0.17) to moderate (R(2)a=0.71). The parameter exhibiting the highest correlation magnitude is B (Breathiness), whereas the weaker correlation magnitudes were found to be for A (Asthenia) and S (Strain). The acoustic measures with stronger predictive values were local Shimmer, harmonics-to-noise ratio, APQ5 shimmer, and PPQ5 jitter, with different magnitudes for each one of the studied software programs.
CONCLUSIONS: Some acoustic measures are pointed as significant predictors of GRBAS parameters, but they differ among software programs. B (Breathiness) was the parameter exhibiting the highest correlation magnitude.
Copyright © 2015 The Voice Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic; Assessment; Audio-perceptual; Correlation; Voice

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25619471     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  4 in total

1.  Multimodal Evaluation of Voice Outcome in Early Glottic Cancers Treated With Definitive Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Marianna Trignani; Angelo DI Pilla; Consuelo Rosa; Marzia Borgia; David Fasciolo; Lucrezia Gasparini; Fiorella DI Guglielmo; Albina Allajbej; Marta DI Francesco; Gianluca Falcone; Francesca Vitullo; Adelchi Croce; Domenico Genovesi; Luciana Caravatta
Journal:  Cancer Diagn Progn       Date:  2021-07-03

2.  Acoustic parameters of voice in typically developing children ages 4-19 years.

Authors:  Raymond D Kent; Julie T Eichhorn; Houri K Vorperian
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-01-10       Impact factor: 1.675

3.  Which Plosive Consonant Is More Useful for the Aerodynamic Analysis of Pathologic Voice?

Authors:  Yong Tae Hong; Phan Huu Ngoc Minh; Ki Hwan Hong
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 3.372

4.  Impact of laryngopharyngeal reflux on subjective and objective voice assessments: a prospective study.

Authors:  Jérôme R Lechien; Kathy Huet; Mohamad Khalife; Anne-Françoise Fourneau; Véronique Delvaux; Myriam Piccaluga; Bernard Harmegnies; Sven Saussez
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-11-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.