Literature DB >> 25617514

Choosing your partner for the PROM: a review of evidence on patient-reported outcome measures for use in primary and community care.

Stirling Bryan1, Jennifer Davis2, James Broesch2, Mary M Doyle-Waters3, Steven Lewis4, Kim McGrail5, Margaret J McGregor6, Janice M Murphy7, Rick Sawatzky.   

Abstract

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are assessments of health status from the patient's perspective. The systematic and routine collection and use of PROMs in healthcare settings adds value in several ways, including quality improvement and service evaluation. We address the issue of instrument selection for use in primary and/or community settings. Specifically, from the large number of available PROMs, which instrument delivers the highest level of performance and validity? For selected generic PROMs, we reviewed literature on psychometric properties and other instrument features (e.g., health domains captured). Briefly we summarize key strengths of the three PROMs that received the most favourable psycho-metric and overall evaluation. The Short-Form 36 has a number of strengths, chiefly, its strong psychometric properties such as responsiveness. The PROMIS/Global Health Scale scored highly on most criteria and warrants serious consideration, especially as it is free to use. The EQ-5D scored satisfactorily on many criteria and, beneficially, it has a low response burden.
Copyright © 2014 Longwoods Publishing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25617514      PMCID: PMC4748356     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthc Policy        ISSN: 1715-6572


  27 in total

Review 1.  A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation.

Authors:  J Brazier; M Deverill; C Green; R Harper; A Booth
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Assessing the reliability of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in a sample of older African American and Caucasian adults.

Authors:  M E Ford; S L Havstad; C S Kart
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  The 15D instrument of health-related quality of life: properties and applications.

Authors:  H Sintonen
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.709

Review 4.  A comparative review of four preference-weighted measures of health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Jacek A Kopec; Kevin D Willison
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group.

Authors:  S M Skevington; M Lotfy; K A O'Connell
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  The Nottingham Health Profile--a measure of health-related quality of life.

Authors:  I Wiklund
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care Suppl       Date:  1990

7.  Population norms for the AQoL derived from the 2007 Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing.

Authors:  Graeme Hawthorne; Sam Korn; Jeff Richardson
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.939

Review 8.  Relationship between psychometric and utility-based approaches to the measurement of health-related quality of life.

Authors:  D A Revicki; R M Kaplan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Psychometric evaluation of the SF-36 health survey in Medicare managed care.

Authors:  Barbara Gandek; Samuel J Sinclair; Mark Kosinski; John E Ware
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2004

10.  The validity of the SF-36 in an Australian National Household Survey: demonstrating the applicability of the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey to examination of health inequalities.

Authors:  Peter Butterworth; Timothy Crosier
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  17 in total

1.  Development and psychometric properties of the Self-efficacy for Mindfulness Meditation Practice scale.

Authors:  Gurjeet S Birdee; Kenneth A Wallston; Sujata G Ayala; Edward H Ip; Stephanie J Sohl
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2018-06-29

2.  Long-term evolution of patient-reported outcome measures in spinocerebellar ataxias.

Authors:  Heike Jacobi; Sophie Tezenas du Montcel; Peter Bauer; Paola Giunti; Arron Cook; Robyn Labrum; Michael H Parkinson; Alexandra Durr; Alexis Brice; Perrine Charles; Cecilia Marelli; Caterina Mariotti; Lorenzo Nanetti; Lidia Sarro; Maria Rakowicz; Anna Sulek; Anna Sobanska; Tanja Schmitz-Hübsch; Ludger Schöls; Holger Hengel; Laszlo Baliko; Bela Melegh; Alessandro Filla; Antonella Antenora; Jon Infante; José Berciano; Bart P van de Warrenburg; Dagmar Timmann; Sandra Szymanski; Sylvia Boesch; Wolfgang Nachbauer; Jun-Suk Kang; Massimo Pandolfo; Jörg B Schulz; Audrey Tanguy Melac; Alhassane Diallo; Thomas Klockgether
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Validation of the Computerized Adaptive Test for Mental Health in Primary Care.

Authors:  Andrea K Graham; Alexa Minc; Erin Staab; David G Beiser; Robert D Gibbons; Neda Laiteerapong
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Study protocol: a pragmatic, stepped-wedge trial of tailored support for implementing social determinants of health documentation/action in community health centers, with realist evaluation.

Authors:  Rachel Gold; Arwen Bunce; Erika Cottrell; Miguel Marino; Mary Middendorf; Stuart Cowburn; Dagan Wright; Ned Mossman; Katie Dambrun; Byron J Powell; Inga Gruß; Laura Gottlieb; Marla Dearing; Jason Scott; Nadia Yosuf; Molly Krancari
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  Patient Judgement of Change with Elective Surgery Correlates with Patient Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life.

Authors:  Meg E Morris; Victoria Atkinson; Jeffrey Woods; Paul S Myles; Anita Hodge; Cathy H Jones; Damien Lloyd; Vincent Rovtar; Amanda M Clifford; Natasha K Brusco
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27

6.  Comparing surgeon outcomes in endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Timothy L Smith; Jess C Mace; Luke Rudmik; Rodney J Schlosser; Peter H Hwang; Jeremiah A Alt; Zachary M Soler
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Adoption of Social Determinants of Health EHR Tools by Community Health Centers.

Authors:  Rachel Gold; Arwen Bunce; Stuart Cowburn; Katie Dambrun; Marla Dearing; Mary Middendorf; Ned Mossman; Celine Hollombe; Peter Mahr; Gerardo Melgar; James Davis; Laura Gottlieb; Erika Cottrell
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  Home-based Physical Activity Coaching, Physical Activity, and Health Care Utilization in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Self-Management Activation Research Trial Secondary Outcomes.

Authors:  David B Coultas; Bradford E Jackson; Rennie Russo; Jennifer Peoples; Karan P Singh; John Sloan; Minyong Uhm; Jamile A Ashmore; Steven N Blair; Sejong Bae
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2018-04

9.  Using Patient- and Family-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures Across Transitions of Care for Frail Older Adults Living at Home: A Meta-Narrative Synthesis.

Authors:  Kara Schick-Makaroff; Mehri Karimi-Dehkordi; Lena Cuthbertson; Duncan Dixon; S Robin Cohen; Neil Hilliard; Richard Sawatzky
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2021-04-03

10.  General and oral health problems among adults with focus on dentally anxious individuals.

Authors:  Magnus Hakeberg; Ulla Wide
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 2.607

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.