Maarten P G Massink1, Irsan E Kooi2, Saskia E van Mil3, Ekaterina S Jordanova4, Najim Ameziane5, Josephine C Dorsman6, Daphne M van Beek7, J Patrick van der Voorn8, Daoud Sie9, Bauke Ylstra10, Carolien H M van Deurzen11, John W Martens12, Marcel Smid13, Anieta M Sieuwerts14, Vanja de Weerd15, John A Foekens16, Ans M W van den Ouweland17, Ewald van Dyk18, Petra M Nederlof19, Quinten Waisfisz20, Hanne Meijers-Heijboer21. 1. Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: m.massink@vumc.nl. 2. Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: ei.kooi@vumc.nl. 3. Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: se.vanmil@vumc.nl. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Center for Gynaecologic Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: e.jordanova@vumc.nl. 5. Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: n.ameziane@vumc.nl. 6. Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: jc.dorsman@vumc.nl. 7. Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: d.vanbeek@vumc.nl. 8. Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: jp.vandervoorn@vumc.nl. 9. Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: d.sie@vumc.nl. 10. Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: b.ylstra@vumc.nl. 11. Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: c.h.m.vandeurzen@erasmusmc.nl. 12. Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: j.martens@erasmusmc.nl. 13. Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: m.smid@erasmusmc.nl. 14. Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: a.sieuwerts@erasmusmc.nl. 15. Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: v.deweerd@erasmusmc.nl. 16. Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: j.foekens@erasmusmc.nl. 17. Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: a.vandenouweland@erasmusmc.nl. 18. Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: e.v.dijk@nki.nl. 19. Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: p.nederlof@nki.nl. 20. Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: q.waisfisz@vumc.nl. 21. Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: h.meijers-heijboer@vumc.nl.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: BRCA1-mutated breast carcinomas may have distinct biological features, suggesting the involvement of specific oncogenic pathways in tumor development. The identification of genomic aberrations characteristic for BRCA1-mutated breast carcinomas could lead to a better understanding of BRCA1-associated oncogenic events and could prove valuable in clinical testing for BRCA1-involvement in patients. METHODS: For this purpose, genomic and gene expression profiles of basal-like BRCA1-mutated breast tumors (n = 27) were compared with basal-like familial BRCAX (non-BRCA1/2/CHEK2*1100delC) tumors (n = 14) in a familial cohort of 120 breast carcinomas. RESULTS: Genome wide copy number profiles of the BRCA1-mutated breast carcinomas in our data appeared heterogeneous. Gene expression analyses identified varying amounts of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) as a major cause for this heterogeneity. Indeed, selecting tumors with relative low amounts of TILs, resulted in the identification of three known but also five previously unrecognized BRCA1-associated copy number aberrations. Moreover, these aberrations occurred with high frequencies in the BRCA1-mutated tumor samples. Using these regions it was possible to discriminate BRCA1-mutated from BRCAX breast carcinomas, and they were validated in two independent cohorts. To further substantiate our findings, we used flow cytometry to isolate cancer cells from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, BRCA1-mutated triple negative breast carcinomas with estimated TIL percentages of 40% and higher. Genomic profiles of sorted and unsorted fractions were compared by shallow whole genome sequencing and confirm our findings. CONCLUSION: This study shows that genomic profiling of in particular basal-like, and thus BRCA1-mutated, breast carcinomas is severely affected by the presence of high numbers of TILs. Previous reports on genomic profiling of BRCA1-mutated breast carcinomas have largely neglected this. Therefore, our findings have direct consequences on the interpretation of published genomic data. Also, these findings could prove valuable in light of currently used genomic tools for assessing BRCA1-involvement in breast cancer patients and pathogenicity assessment of BRCA1 variants of unknown significance. The BRCA1-associated genomic aberrations identified in this study provide possible leads to a better understanding of BRCA1-associated oncogenesis.
INTRODUCTION:BRCA1-mutated breast carcinomas may have distinct biological features, suggesting the involvement of specific oncogenic pathways in tumor development. The identification of genomic aberrations characteristic for BRCA1-mutated breast carcinomas could lead to a better understanding of BRCA1-associated oncogenic events and could prove valuable in clinical testing for BRCA1-involvement in patients. METHODS: For this purpose, genomic and gene expression profiles of basal-like BRCA1-mutated breast tumors (n = 27) were compared with basal-like familial BRCAX (non-BRCA1/2/CHEK2*1100delC) tumors (n = 14) in a familial cohort of 120 breast carcinomas. RESULTS: Genome wide copy number profiles of the BRCA1-mutated breast carcinomas in our data appeared heterogeneous. Gene expression analyses identified varying amounts of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) as a major cause for this heterogeneity. Indeed, selecting tumors with relative low amounts of TILs, resulted in the identification of three known but also five previously unrecognized BRCA1-associated copy number aberrations. Moreover, these aberrations occurred with high frequencies in the BRCA1-mutated tumor samples. Using these regions it was possible to discriminate BRCA1-mutated from BRCAXbreast carcinomas, and they were validated in two independent cohorts. To further substantiate our findings, we used flow cytometry to isolate cancer cells from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, BRCA1-mutated triple negative breast carcinomas with estimated TIL percentages of 40% and higher. Genomic profiles of sorted and unsorted fractions were compared by shallow whole genome sequencing and confirm our findings. CONCLUSION: This study shows that genomic profiling of in particular basal-like, and thus BRCA1-mutated, breast carcinomas is severely affected by the presence of high numbers of TILs. Previous reports on genomic profiling of BRCA1-mutated breast carcinomas have largely neglected this. Therefore, our findings have direct consequences on the interpretation of published genomic data. Also, these findings could prove valuable in light of currently used genomic tools for assessing BRCA1-involvement in breast cancerpatients and pathogenicity assessment of BRCA1 variants of unknown significance. The BRCA1-associated genomic aberrations identified in this study provide possible leads to a better understanding of BRCA1-associated oncogenesis.
Authors: Lodewyk F A Wessels; Tibor van Welsem; Augustinus A M Hart; Laura J van't Veer; Marcel J T Reinders; Petra M Nederlof Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2002-12-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Göran Jönsson; Tara L Naylor; Johan Vallon-Christersson; Johan Staaf; Jia Huang; M Renee Ward; Joel D Greshock; Lena Luts; Håkan Olsson; Nazneen Rahman; Michael Stratton; Markus Ringnér; Ake Borg; Barbara L Weber Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2005-09-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein Journal: Nature Date: 2000-08-17 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Emiliano Honrado; Ana Osorio; José Palacios; Roger L Milne; Lydia Sánchez; Orland Díez; Alicia Cazorla; Kirsi Syrjakoski; David Huntsman; Päivi Heikkilä; Enrique Lerma; Anne Kallioniemi; Carmen Rivas; William D Foulkes; Heli Nevanlinna; Javier Benítez Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-10-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Markus Rasmussen; Magnus Sundström; Hanna Göransson Kultima; Johan Botling; Patrick Micke; Helgi Birgisson; Bengt Glimelius; Anders Isaksson Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2011-10-24 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Göran Jönsson; Johan Staaf; Johan Vallon-Christersson; Markus Ringnér; Karolina Holm; Cecilia Hegardt; Haukur Gunnarsson; Rainer Fagerholm; Carina Strand; Bjarni A Agnarsson; Outi Kilpivaara; Lena Luts; Päivi Heikkilä; Kristiina Aittomäki; Carl Blomqvist; Niklas Loman; Per Malmström; Håkan Olsson; Oskar Th Johannsson; Adalgeir Arason; Heli Nevanlinna; Rosa B Barkardottir; Ake Borg Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2010-06-24 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Esther H Lips; Nadja Laddach; Suvi P Savola; Marieke A Vollebergh; Anne M M Oonk; Alex L T Imholz; Lodewyk F A Wessels; Jelle Wesseling; Petra M Nederlof; Sjoerd Rodenhuis Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2011-10-27 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Goncalo R Abecasis; Adam Auton; Lisa D Brooks; Mark A DePristo; Richard M Durbin; Robert E Handsaker; Hyun Min Kang; Gabor T Marth; Gil A McVean Journal: Nature Date: 2012-11-01 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Britta Weigelt; Rui Bi; Rahul Kumar; Pedro Blecua; Diana L Mandelker; Felipe C Geyer; Fresia Pareja; Paul A James; Fergus J Couch; Diana M Eccles; Fiona Blows; Paul Pharoah; Anqi Li; Pier Selenica; Raymond S Lim; Gowtham Jayakumaran; Nic Waddell; Ronglai Shen; Larry Norton; Hannah Y Wen; Simon N Powell; Nadeem Riaz; Mark E Robson; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Georgia Chenevix-Trench Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Tommaso De Marchi; Mieke A Timmermans; Anieta M Sieuwerts; Marcel Smid; Maxime P Look; Nicolai Grebenchtchikov; Fred C G J Sweep; Jan G Smits; Viktor Magdolen; Carolien H M van Deurzen; John A Foekens; Arzu Umar; John W Martens Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-05-18 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Alireza Torabi; Javier Ordonez; Brenda Bin Su; Laura Palmer; Chunxiang Mao; Katherine E Lara; Lewis P Rubin; Chun Xu Journal: Med Sci (Basel) Date: 2016-08-03
Authors: Irsan E Kooi; Berber M Mol; Annette C Moll; Paul van der Valk; Marcus C de Jong; Pim de Graaf; Saskia E van Mil; Antoinette Y N Schouten-van Meeteren; Hanne Meijers-Heijboer; Gertjan L Kaspers; Hein Te Riele; Jacqueline Cloos; Josephine C Dorsman Journal: EBioMedicine Date: 2015-07-08 Impact factor: 8.143