Literature DB >> 16234517

Immunohistochemical expression of DNA repair proteins in familial breast cancer differentiate BRCA2-associated tumors.

Emiliano Honrado1, Ana Osorio, José Palacios, Roger L Milne, Lydia Sánchez, Orland Díez, Alicia Cazorla, Kirsi Syrjakoski, David Huntsman, Päivi Heikkilä, Enrique Lerma, Anne Kallioniemi, Carmen Rivas, William D Foulkes, Heli Nevanlinna, Javier Benítez.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Morphologic and immunohistochemical studies of familial breast cancers have identified specific characteristics associated with BRCA1 mutation-associated tumors when compared with BRCA2 and non-BRCA1/2 tumors, but have not identified differences between BRCA2 and non-BRCA1/2 tumors. Because BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes participate in the DNA repair pathway, we have performed an immunohistochemical study with markers related to this pathway to establish the profile of the three groups.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have studied two tissue microarrays that include 103 familial and 104 sporadic breast tumors, with a panel of DNA repair markers including ATM, CHEK2, RAD51, RAD50, XRCC3, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen.
RESULTS: We found more frequent expression of CHEK2 in BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumors than in non-BRCA1/2 and sporadic tumors. We found absence of nuclear expression and presence of cytoplasmic expression of RAD51 in BRCA2 tumors that differentiate them from other familial tumors. We validated these results with a new series of patient cases. The final study with 253 familial patient cases (74 BRCA1, 71 BRCA2, 108 non-BRCA1/2), and 288 sporadic patient cases, has allowed us to confirm our preliminary results. Because BRCA2 tumors present a specific immunohistochemical profile for RAD51 and CHEK2 markers that is different from non-BRCA1/2 tumors, we have built a multivariate model with these markers that distinguish both tumors with an estimated probability of at least 76%.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that BRCA2 tumors demonstrate more cytoplasmic and less nuclear RAD51 staining, and increased CHEK2 staining. This pattern may distinguish BRCA2 from familial non-BRCA1/2 tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16234517     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.3698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  25 in total

1.  Prediction of breast cancer sensitivity to neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on status of DNA damage repair proteins.

Authors:  Hideki Asakawa; Hirotaka Koizumi; Ayaka Koike; Makiko Takahashi; Wenwen Wu; Hirotaka Iwase; Mamoru Fukuda; Tomohiko Ohta
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 6.466

2.  DNA repair pathway gene expression score correlates with repair proficiency and tumor sensitivity to chemotherapy.

Authors:  Sean P Pitroda; Itai M Pashtan; Hillary L Logan; Brian Budke; Thomas E Darga; Ralph R Weichselbaum; Philip P Connell
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 17.956

3.  Expression pattern of ATM and cyclin D1 in ductal carcinoma, normal adjacent and normal breast tissues of Iranian breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Mahdieh Salimi; Hossein Mozdarani; Keivan Majidzadeh
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Functional interplay between the DNA-damage-response kinase ATM and ARF tumour suppressor protein in human cancer.

Authors:  Georgia Velimezi; Michalis Liontos; Konstantinos Vougas; Theodoros Roumeliotis; Jirina Bartkova; Maria Sideridou; Ayguel Dereli-Oz; Maciej Kocylowski; Ioannis S Pateras; Kostas Evangelou; Athanassios Kotsinas; Ines Orsolic; Sladana Bursac; Maja Cokaric-Brdovcak; Vassilis Zoumpourlis; Dimitris Kletsas; George Papafotiou; Apostolos Klinakis; Sinisa Volarevic; Wei Gu; Jiri Bartek; Thanos D Halazonetis; Vassilis G Gorgoulis
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2013-07-14       Impact factor: 28.824

5.  Overexpression of RAD51 occurs in aggressive prostatic cancer.

Authors:  Anita Mitra; Charles Jameson; Yolanda Barbachano; Lydia Sanchez; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Susan Peock; Nayanta Sodha; Elizabeth Bancroft; Anne Fletcher; Colin Cooper; Douglas Easton; Rosalind Eeles; Christopher S Foster
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  Tumor characteristics as an analytic tool for classifying genetic variants of uncertain clinical significance.

Authors:  Robert M W Hofstra; Amanda B Spurdle; Diana Eccles; William D Foulkes; Niels de Wind; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Frans B L Hogervorst
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.878

7.  Genome-wide linkage scan reveals three putative breast-cancer-susceptibility loci.

Authors:  Juan Manuel Rosa-Rosa; Guillermo Pita; Miguel Urioste; Gemma Llort; Joan Brunet; Conxi Lázaro; Ignacio Blanco; Teresa Ramón y Cajal; Orland Díez; Miguel de la Hoya; Trinidad Caldés; Maria-Isabel Tejada; Anna González-Neira; Javier Benítez
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Comprehensive characterization of the DNA amplification at 13q34 in human breast cancer reveals TFDP1 and CUL4A as likely candidate target genes.

Authors:  Lorenzo Melchor; Laura Paula Saucedo-Cuevas; Iván Muñoz-Repeto; Socorro María Rodríguez-Pinilla; Emiliano Honrado; Alfredo Campoverde; Jose Palacios; Katherine L Nathanson; María José García; Javier Benítez
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 9.  The complex genetic landscape of familial breast cancer.

Authors:  Lorenzo Melchor; Javier Benítez
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Familial breast/ovarian cancer and BRCA1/2 genetic screening: the role of immunohistochemistry as an additional method in the selection of patients.

Authors:  Fátima H Vaz; Patrícia M Machado; Rita D Brandão; Cátia T Laranjeira; Joana S Eugénio; Aires H Fernandes; Saudade P André
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 2.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.