Literature DB >> 25615774

Alternative screening for dense breasts: MRI.

Elizabeth A M O'Flynn1, Araminta E W Ledger, Nandita M deSouza.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to review the use of MRI in breast density measurement and breast cancer risk estimation and to discuss the role of MRI as an alternative screening to mammography for screening women with dense breasts. CONCLUSION. The potential of MRI for screening women with dense breasts remains controversial because of the paucity of clinical evidence, the possibility of overdiagnosis, and the cost-effectiveness of the technique in this population. Although methods of MRI measurement require standardization and automation, future addition of MRI density to risk models may positively impact their value.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; breast cancer screening; breast density

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25615774     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.14.13636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  6 in total

1.  Proton density water fraction as a reproducible MR-based measurement of breast density.

Authors:  Leah C Henze Bancroft; Roberta M Strigel; Erin B Macdonald; Colin Longhurst; Jacob Johnson; Diego Hernando; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-11-14       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Sensitivity of Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI vs X-ray Mammography Based on Cancer Histology, Tumor Grading, Receptor Status, and Molecular Subtype: A Supplemental Analysis of 2 Large Phase III Studies.

Authors:  Jan Endrikat; Gilda Schmidt; Daniel Haverstock; Olaf Weber; Zuzana Jirakova Trnkova; Jörg Barkhausen
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2022-04-19

3.  Primary Care Provider Experience with Breast Density Legislation in Massachusetts.

Authors:  Christine M Gunn; Nancy R Kressin; Kristina Cooper; Cinthya Marturano; Karen M Freund; Tracy A Battaglia
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Deep learning networks find unique mammographic differences in previous negative mammograms between interval and screen-detected cancers: a case-case study.

Authors:  Benjamin Hinton; Lin Ma; Amir Pasha Mahmoudzadeh; Serghei Malkov; Bo Fan; Heather Greenwood; Bonnie Joe; Vivian Lee; Karla Kerlikowske; John Shepherd
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 3.909

5.  Kinetic patterns of benign and malignant breast lesions on contrast enhanced digital mammogram.

Authors:  Jer-Shyung Huang; Huay-Ben Pan; Tsung-Lung Yang; Bao-Hui Hung; Chia-Ling Chiang; Meng-Yuan Tsai; Chen-Pin Chou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Multimodality Imaging of Breast Parenchymal Density and Correlation with Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Georg J Wengert; Thomas H Helbich; Doris Leithner; Elizabeth A Morris; Pascal A T Baltzer; Katja Pinker
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2019-01-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.