PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to investigate the extent to which sample length affected the reliability of total number of words (TNW), number of different words (NDW), and mean length of C-units in morphemes (MLCUm) in parent-elicited conversational samples for 3-year-olds. METHOD: Participants were sixty 3-year-olds. A 22-min language sample was collected from each child during free play with the parent in the laboratory. Samples of 1, 3, 7, and 10 min were extracted from the 22-min samples. TNW, NDW, and MLCUm were computed from each shorter sample and the 22-min sample. TNW and NDW were adjusted by number of minutes for comparisons. The differences and correlations between each shorter sample cut and the 22-min sample on MLCUm and adjusted TNW and NDW were computed. RESULTS: The shorter samples and the 22-min samples significantly differed in adjusted TNW and NDW, but not in MLCUm. TNW reached an acceptable reliability level (i.e., r = .90) in 7-min samples. NDW and MLCUm approached the acceptable reliability level (rs = .88) in 7-min samples and reached it in 10-min samples. CONCLUSION: For conversational language samples with similar collection procedures, samples of 7 to 10 min are desirable for calculating TNW, NDW, and MLCUm in 3-year-olds.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to investigate the extent to which sample length affected the reliability of total number of words (TNW), number of different words (NDW), and mean length of C-units in morphemes (MLCUm) in parent-elicited conversational samples for 3-year-olds. METHOD:Participants were sixty 3-year-olds. A 22-min language sample was collected from each child during free play with the parent in the laboratory. Samples of 1, 3, 7, and 10 min were extracted from the 22-min samples. TNW, NDW, and MLCUm were computed from each shorter sample and the 22-min sample. TNW and NDW were adjusted by number of minutes for comparisons. The differences and correlations between each shorter sample cut and the 22-min sample on MLCUm and adjusted TNW and NDW were computed. RESULTS: The shorter samples and the 22-min samples significantly differed in adjusted TNW and NDW, but not in MLCUm. TNW reached an acceptable reliability level (i.e., r = .90) in 7-min samples. NDW and MLCUm approached the acceptable reliability level (rs = .88) in 7-min samples and reached it in 10-min samples. CONCLUSION: For conversational language samples with similar collection procedures, samples of 7 to 10 min are desirable for calculating TNW, NDW, and MLCUm in 3-year-olds.
Authors: Janna B Oetting; Brandi L Newkirk; Lekeitha R Hartfield; Christy G Wynn; Sonja L Pruitt; April W Garrity Journal: Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch Date: 2010-04-26 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Megan Micheletti; Kaya de Barbaro; Michelle D Fellows; J Gregory Hixon; Richard B Slatcher; James W Pennebaker Journal: J Fam Psychol Date: 2020-04-09
Authors: Courtney E Venker; Daniel M Bolt; Allison Meyer; Heidi Sindberg; Susan Ellis Weismer; Helen Tager-Flusberg Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 2.297
Authors: Brittany L Manning; Alexandra Harpole; Emily M Harriott; Kamila Postolowicz; Elizabeth S Norton Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2020-11-13 Impact factor: 2.297