Gerald J Jerome1, Seung-uk Ko2, Danielle Kauffman3, Stephanie A Studenski3, Luigi Ferrucci3, Eleanor M Simonsick3. 1. Department of Kinesiology, Towson University, Towson, MD, USA. Electronic address: gjerome@towson.edu. 2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chonnam National University, Yeosu, South Korea. 3. Longitudinal Studies Section, National Institute on Aging (NIA/NIH), Baltimore, MD, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Understanding the mechanisms that contribute to walking speed decline can provide needed insight for developing targeted interventions to reduce the rate and likelihood of decline. OBJECTIVE: Examine the association between gait characteristics and walking speed decline in older adults. METHODS: Participants in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging aged 60 to 89 were evaluated in the gait laboratory which used a three dimensional motion capture system and force platforms to assess cadence, stride length, stride width, percent of gait cycle in double stance, anterior-posterior mechanical work expenditure (MWE), and medial-lateral MWE. Usual walking speed was assessed over 6 m at baseline and follow-up. Gait characteristics associated with meaningful decline (decline≥0.05 m/s/y) in walking speed were evaluated by logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, race, height, weight, initial walking speed and follow-up time. RESULTS: Among 362 participants, the average age was 72.4 (SD=8.1) years, 51% were female, 27% were black and 23% were identified has having meaningful decline in usual walking speed with an average follow-up time of 3.2 (1.1) years. In the fully adjusted model, faster cadence [ORadj=0.65, 95% CI (0.43,0.97)] and longer strides [ORadj=0.87, 95% CI (0.83,0.91)] were associated with lower odds of decline. However age [ORadj=1.04, 95% CI (0.99,1.10)] was not associated with decline when controlling for gait characteristics and other demographics. CONCLUSION: A sizable proportion of healthy older adults experienced walking speed decline over an average of 3 years. Longer stride and faster cadence were protective against meaningful decline in usual walking speed.
BACKGROUND: Understanding the mechanisms that contribute to walking speed decline can provide needed insight for developing targeted interventions to reduce the rate and likelihood of decline. OBJECTIVE: Examine the association between gait characteristics and walking speed decline in older adults. METHODS:Participants in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging aged 60 to 89 were evaluated in the gait laboratory which used a three dimensional motion capture system and force platforms to assess cadence, stride length, stride width, percent of gait cycle in double stance, anterior-posterior mechanical work expenditure (MWE), and medial-lateral MWE. Usual walking speed was assessed over 6 m at baseline and follow-up. Gait characteristics associated with meaningful decline (decline≥0.05 m/s/y) in walking speed were evaluated by logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, race, height, weight, initial walking speed and follow-up time. RESULTS: Among 362 participants, the average age was 72.4 (SD=8.1) years, 51% were female, 27% were black and 23% were identified has having meaningful decline in usual walking speed with an average follow-up time of 3.2 (1.1) years. In the fully adjusted model, faster cadence [ORadj=0.65, 95% CI (0.43,0.97)] and longer strides [ORadj=0.87, 95% CI (0.83,0.91)] were associated with lower odds of decline. However age [ORadj=1.04, 95% CI (0.99,1.10)] was not associated with decline when controlling for gait characteristics and other demographics. CONCLUSION: A sizable proportion of healthy older adults experienced walking speed decline over an average of 3 years. Longer stride and faster cadence were protective against meaningful decline in usual walking speed.
Authors: Melissa E Chamberlin; Brandy D Fulwider; Sheryl L Sanders; John M Medeiros Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Anne B Newman; Eleanor M Simonsick; Barbara L Naydeck; Robert M Boudreau; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Michael C Nevitt; Marco Pahor; Suzanne Satterfield; Jennifer S Brach; Stephanie A Studenski; Tamara B Harris Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-05-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Annie Robitaille; Andrea M Piccinin; Scott M Hofer; Boo Johansson; Graciela Muniz Terrera Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Joshua J Stefanik; K Douglas Gross; Ali Guermazi; David T Felson; Frank W Roemer; Jingbo Niu; John A Lynch; Neil A Segal; Cora E Lewis; Cara L Lewis Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Taylor Leeder; Farahnaz Fallahtafti; Molly Schieber; Sara A Myers; Julie Blaskewicz Boron; Jennifer M Yentes Journal: Aging Clin Exp Res Date: 2018-10-26 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: Florian G Metzger; Markus A Hobert; Ann-Christine Ehlis; Sandra E Hasmann; Tim Hahn; Gerhard W Eschweiler; Daniela Berg; Andreas J Fallgatter; Walter Maetzler Journal: Front Aging Neurosci Date: 2016-10-13 Impact factor: 5.750
Authors: Sinikka Lotvonen; Helvi Kyngäs; Pentti Koistinen; Risto Bloigu; Satu Elo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-08-25 Impact factor: 3.390