Literature DB >> 25614140

Modulation of bone's sensitivity to low-intensity vibrations by acceleration magnitude, vibration duration, and number of bouts.

S Judex1, T J Koh, L Xie.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Variables defining vibration-based biomechanical treatments were tested by their ability to affect the musculoskeleton in the growing mouse. Duration of a vibration bout, but not variations in vibration intensity or number of vibration bouts per day, was identified as modulator of trabecular bone formation rates.
INTRODUCTION: Low-intensity vibrations (LIV) may enhance musculoskeletal properties, but little is known regarding the role that individual LIV variables play. We determined whether acceleration magnitude and/or the number and duration of daily loading bouts may modulate LIV efficacy.
METHODS: LIV was applied to 8-week-old mice at either 0.3 g or 0.6 g for three weeks; the number of daily bouts was one, two, or four, and the duration of a single bout was 15, 30, or 60 min. A frequency of 45 Hz was used throughout.
RESULTS: LIV induced tibial cortical surface strains in 4-month-old mice of approximately 10 με at 0.3 g and 30 με at 0.6 g. In trabecular bone of the proximal tibial metaphysis, all single daily bout signal combinations with the exception of a single 15 min daily bout at 0.3 g (i.e., single bouts of 30 and 60 min at 0.3 g and 15 and 30 min at 0.6 g) produced greater bone formation rates (BFR/BS) than in controls. Across all signal combinations, 30 and 60 min bouts were significantly more effective than 15 min bouts in raising BFR/BS above control levels. Increasing the number of daily bouts or partitioning a single daily bout into several shorter bouts did not potentiate efficacy and in some instances led to BFR/BS that was not significantly different from those in controls. Bone chemical and muscle properties were similar across all groups.
CONCLUSIONS: These data may provide a basis towards optimization of LIV efficacy and indicate that in the growing mouse skeleton, increasing bout duration from 15 to 30 or 60 min positively influences BFR/BS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25614140     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-014-3018-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  42 in total

1.  Quantifying the strain history of bone: spatial uniformity and self-similarity of low-magnitude strains.

Authors:  S P Fritton; K J McLeod; C T Rubin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Partitioning a daily mechanical stimulus into discrete loading bouts improves the osteogenic response to loading.

Authors:  A G Robling; D B Burr; C H Turner
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Rapid establishment of chemical and mechanical properties during lamellar bone formation.

Authors:  B Busa; L M Miller; C T Rubin; Y-X Qin; S Judex
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Low-level mechanical vibrations can influence bone resorption and bone formation in the growing skeleton.

Authors:  Liqin Xie; Jeffrey M Jacobson; Edna S Choi; Bhavin Busa; Leah Rae Donahue; Lisa M Miller; Clinton T Rubin; Stefan Judex
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 5.  Physical activity in childhood may be the key to optimizing lifespan skeletal health.

Authors:  Katherine B Gunter; Hawley C Almstedt; Kathleen F Janz
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 6.230

6.  Effect of 12 months of whole-body vibration therapy on bone density and structure in postmenopausal women: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Lubomira Slatkovska; Shabbir M H Alibhai; Joseph Beyene; Hanxian Hu; Alice Demaras; Angela M Cheung
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Urokinase-type plasminogen activator and macrophages are required for skeletal muscle hypertrophy in mice.

Authors:  Dana M DiPasquale; Ming Cheng; William Billich; Sharon A Huang; Nico van Rooijen; Troy A Hornberger; Timothy J Koh
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 4.249

8.  Enhancement of the adolescent murine musculoskeletal system using low-level mechanical vibrations.

Authors:  Liqin Xie; Clinton Rubin; Stefan Judex
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2008-02-07

9.  Gap junctional communication in osteocytes is amplified by low intensity vibrations in vitro.

Authors:  Gunes Uzer; Suphannee Pongkitwitoon; Cheng Ian; William R Thompson; Janet Rubin; Meilin E Chan; Stefan Judex
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Vigorous physical activity increases fracture risk in children irrespective of bone mass: a prospective study of the independent risk factors for fractures in healthy children.

Authors:  Emma M Clark; Andy R Ness; Jon H Tobias
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Vibration Therapy to Prevent Bone Loss and Falls: Mechanisms and Efficacy.

Authors:  Belinda R Beck
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.096

2.  Cytoskeletal Configuration Modulates Mechanically Induced Changes in Mesenchymal Stem Cell Osteogenesis, Morphology, and Stiffness.

Authors:  Suphannee Pongkitwitoon; Gunes Uzer; Janet Rubin; Stefan Judex
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Differential Efficacy of 2 Vibrating Orthodontic Devices to Alter the Cellular Response in Osteoblasts, Fibroblasts, and Osteoclasts.

Authors:  Stefan Judex; Suphannee Pongkitwitoon
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Effect of high-frequency vibration on orthodontic tooth movement and bone density.

Authors:  Thomas Shipley; Khaled Farouk; Tarek El-Bialy
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2019-08-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.