Literature DB >> 25614021

Brain computer interfaces for neurorehabilitation – its current status as a rehabilitation strategy post-stroke.

L E H van Dokkum1, T Ward2, I Laffont3.   

Abstract

The idea of using brain computer interfaces (BCI) for rehabilitation emerged relatively recently. Basically, BCI for neurorehabilitation involves the recording and decoding of local brain signals generated by the patient, as he/her tries to perform a particular task (even if imperfect), or during a mental imagery task. The main objective is to promote the recruitment of selected brain areas involved and to facilitate neural plasticity. The recorded signal can be used in several ways: (i) to objectify and strengthen motor imagery-based training, by providing the patient feedback on the imagined motor task, for example, in a virtual environment; (ii) to generate a desired motor task via functional electrical stimulation or rehabilitative robotic orthoses attached to the patient's limb – encouraging and optimizing task execution as well as "closing" the disrupted sensorimotor loop by giving the patient the appropriate sensory feedback; (iii) to understand cerebral reorganizations after lesion, in order to influence or even quantify plasticity-induced changes in brain networks. For example, applying cerebral stimulation to re-equilibrate inter-hemispheric imbalance as shown by functional recording of brain activity during movement may help recovery. Its potential usefulness for a patient population has been demonstrated on various levels and its diverseness in interface applications makes it adaptable to a large population. The position and status of these very new rehabilitation systems should now be considered with respect to our current and more or less validated traditional methods, as well as in the light of the wide range of possible brain damage. The heterogeneity in post-damage expression inevitably complicates the decoding of brain signals and thus their use in pathological conditions, asking for controlled clinical trials.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain computer interfaces; Brain signal; Mental imagery; Neurorehabilitation; Stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25614021     DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2014.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Phys Rehabil Med        ISSN: 1877-0657


  29 in total

1.  Novel hybrid brain-computer interface system based on motor imagery and P300.

Authors:  Cili Zuo; Jing Jin; Erwei Yin; Rami Saab; Yangyang Miao; Xingyu Wang; Dewen Hu; Andrzej Cichocki
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 2.  Upper Limb Home-Based Robotic Rehabilitation During COVID-19 Outbreak.

Authors:  Hemanth Manjunatha; Shrey Pareek; Sri Sadhan Jujjavarapu; Mostafa Ghobadi; Thenkurussi Kesavadas; Ehsan T Esfahani
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2021-05-24

3.  Practical real-time MEG-based neural interfacing with optically pumped magnetometers.

Authors:  Marc M Van Hulle; Richard Bowtell; Matthew J Brookes; Benjamin Wittevrongel; Niall Holmes; Elena Boto; Ryan Hill; Molly Rea; Arno Libert; Elvira Khachatryan
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 7.431

Review 4.  Brain-Computer Interface for Clinical Purposes: Cognitive Assessment and Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Laura Carelli; Federica Solca; Andrea Faini; Paolo Meriggi; Davide Sangalli; Pietro Cipresso; Giuseppe Riva; Nicola Ticozzi; Andrea Ciammola; Vincenzo Silani; Barbara Poletti
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Single-session tDCS over the dominant hemisphere affects contralateral spectral EEG power, but does not enhance neurofeedback-guided event-related desynchronization of the non-dominant hemisphere's sensorimotor rhythm.

Authors:  Valeria Mondini; Anna Lisa Mangia; Angelo Cappello
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Relevant Feature Integration and Extraction for Single-Trial Motor Imagery Classification.

Authors:  Lili Li; Guanghua Xu; Feng Zhang; Jun Xie; Min Li
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Effect of tDCS stimulation of motor cortex and cerebellum on EEG classification of motor imagery and sensorimotor band power.

Authors:  Irma N Angulo-Sherman; Marisol Rodríguez-Ugarte; Nadia Sciacca; Eduardo Iáñez; José M Azorín
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 8.  Rehabilitation of Motor Function after Stroke: A Multiple Systematic Review Focused on Techniques to Stimulate Upper Extremity Recovery.

Authors:  Samar M Hatem; Geoffroy Saussez; Margaux Della Faille; Vincent Prist; Xue Zhang; Delphine Dispa; Yannick Bleyenheuft
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  A Hybrid FPGA-Based System for EEG- and EMG-Based Online Movement Prediction.

Authors:  Hendrik Wöhrle; Marc Tabie; Su Kyoung Kim; Frank Kirchner; Elsa Andrea Kirchner
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Neural Correlates of Motor Recovery after Robot-Assisted Training in Chronic Stroke: A Multimodal Neuroimaging Study.

Authors:  Cheng Chen; Kai Yuan; Xin Wang; Ahsan Khan; Winnie Chiu-Wing Chu; Raymond Kai-Yu Tong
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.